Primary Care and Emergency Room Visits: The Virginia All-Payer Claims Database.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michael Topmiller, Hannah Shadowen, Mark A Carrozza, Jacqueline B Britz, Roy T Sabo, Derek A Chapman, Scott M Strayer, Alex H Krist
{"title":"Primary Care and Emergency Room Visits: The Virginia All-Payer Claims Database.","authors":"Michael Topmiller, Hannah Shadowen, Mark A Carrozza, Jacqueline B Britz, Roy T Sabo, Derek A Chapman, Scott M Strayer, Alex H Krist","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240273R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study utilizes the Virginia all-payer claims database (APCD) to examine the relationship between primary care utilization and emergency department (ER) use and to explore geographic variation in primary care utilization and ER use. We hypothesize that higher rates of primary care utilization will be associated with lower ER use rates, with maps showing clear geographic patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational analysis utilized Bayesian smoothing techniques, regression analysis, and geographic information system (GIS) mapping to explore the association of ER use with primary care utilization. Our analysis included 866 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) in Virginia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary care utilization was significantly associated with ER usage rates. The results show that for every increase of 10 primary care visit rates per 1,000 population, ER use rates decline by 7 per 1,000. The maps show clusters of higher rates of PC utilization throughout central and eastern Virginia, with lower rates in many parts of southern Virginia. Higher rates of ER use are observed in western Virginia, particularly along the border with West Virginia, with clusters of lower rates in northern Virginia near Washington, DC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing the Virginia APCD and GIS mapping, this study finds that primary care utilization is associated with lower rates of ER use. The maps show clear geographic patterns for both ER use and primary care utilization. Important next steps include identifying priority areas, exploring their characteristics, and conducting qualitative research to better understand local factors contributing to their high or low rates of ER use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240273R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study utilizes the Virginia all-payer claims database (APCD) to examine the relationship between primary care utilization and emergency department (ER) use and to explore geographic variation in primary care utilization and ER use. We hypothesize that higher rates of primary care utilization will be associated with lower ER use rates, with maps showing clear geographic patterns.

Methods: This retrospective observational analysis utilized Bayesian smoothing techniques, regression analysis, and geographic information system (GIS) mapping to explore the association of ER use with primary care utilization. Our analysis included 866 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) in Virginia.

Results: Primary care utilization was significantly associated with ER usage rates. The results show that for every increase of 10 primary care visit rates per 1,000 population, ER use rates decline by 7 per 1,000. The maps show clusters of higher rates of PC utilization throughout central and eastern Virginia, with lower rates in many parts of southern Virginia. Higher rates of ER use are observed in western Virginia, particularly along the border with West Virginia, with clusters of lower rates in northern Virginia near Washington, DC.

Conclusions: Utilizing the Virginia APCD and GIS mapping, this study finds that primary care utilization is associated with lower rates of ER use. The maps show clear geographic patterns for both ER use and primary care utilization. Important next steps include identifying priority areas, exploring their characteristics, and conducting qualitative research to better understand local factors contributing to their high or low rates of ER use.

初级保健和急诊室访问:弗吉尼亚所有付款人索赔数据库。
简介:本研究利用维吉尼亚州全付款人索赔数据库(APCD)来检验初级保健利用与急诊科(ER)使用之间的关系,并探讨初级保健利用和急诊室使用的地理差异。我们假设较高的初级保健使用率将与较低的急诊使用率相关,地图显示了明确的地理模式。方法:本回顾性观察分析采用贝叶斯平滑技术、回归分析和地理信息系统(GIS)制图来探讨急诊使用与初级保健利用的关系。我们的分析包括弗吉尼亚州的866个邮政编码制表区(zcta)。结果:初级保健的使用与急诊使用率显著相关。结果表明,每1000人中初级保健就诊率每增加10人,急诊室使用率就会下降7人。地图显示,弗吉尼亚州中部和东部的PC利用率较高,而弗吉尼亚州南部的许多地区利用率较低。在西弗吉尼亚州,特别是与西弗吉尼亚州接壤的边境地区,急诊使用率较高,而在弗吉尼亚州北部靠近华盛顿特区的地区,急诊使用率较低。结论:利用弗吉尼亚州APCD和GIS制图,本研究发现初级保健的利用与较低的急诊室使用率有关。这些地图显示了急诊室使用和初级保健利用的明确地理模式。重要的后续步骤包括确定优先领域,探索其特征,并进行定性研究,以更好地了解导致其急诊室使用率高或低的当地因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信