Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Juan Carlos Cardet, Jonathan M Bailey, Laura P Hurley, Nancy E Maher, Elizabeth W Staton, Barbara P Yawn, Sandra E Zaeh, Elliot Israel, Andrea J Apter, Phuong Bradford, Rafael A Calderon-Candelario, Jennifer K Carroll, Geoffrey L Chupp, Rubin Cohen, Brianna Ericson, Anne L Fuhlbrigge, Barbara M Kaplan, Jean M Kruse, Sylvette Nazario, Wilson D Pace, Magdalena Pasarica, Wanda Phipatanakul, Isaretta L Riley, Jacqueline Rodriguez-Louis, Kartik Shenoy, Paul M Stranges, Hazel Tapp, Michael E Wechsler
{"title":"Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients.","authors":"Juan Carlos Cardet, Jonathan M Bailey, Laura P Hurley, Nancy E Maher, Elizabeth W Staton, Barbara P Yawn, Sandra E Zaeh, Elliot Israel, Andrea J Apter, Phuong Bradford, Rafael A Calderon-Candelario, Jennifer K Carroll, Geoffrey L Chupp, Rubin Cohen, Brianna Ericson, Anne L Fuhlbrigge, Barbara M Kaplan, Jean M Kruse, Sylvette Nazario, Wilson D Pace, Magdalena Pasarica, Wanda Phipatanakul, Isaretta L Riley, Jacqueline Rodriguez-Louis, Kartik Shenoy, Paul M Stranges, Hazel Tapp, Michael E Wechsler","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240014R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) strategy of enhancing usual care with rescue short-acting beta agonist (SABA) supplemented with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduces asthma exacerbations vs. usual care alone in Black and Latinx adults with moderate-severe asthma. We investigated post-trial PARTICS usage and patient perceptions of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PREPARE trial participants randomized to the PARTICS intervention were surveyed an average of 29 months after trial exit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 600 PARTICS-assigned PREPARE trial participants, 505 consented to future research. Fifty-two percent (262/505) completed this survey. Forty-one percent (108/262) continued using PARTICS post-trial. Of these, 97% (105/108) reported that PARTICS helped to control their asthma. Thirty-four percent (37/108) switched from the trial provided QVAR® to other ICS brands due to insurance coverage or clinician issues (e.g., unwillingness to prescribe or misunderstanding of PARTICS; 65%, 24/37). Of those who stopped using PARTICS post-trial (59% [154/262]), 62% (95/154) reported using PARTICS until the PREPARE-provided ICS inhaler ran out, and 31% (47/154) reported not knowing that their asthma care clinician could prescribe it. Only 2% (5/154) of those not using PARTICS reported that it had not been helpful for asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued PARTICS use was common >2 years post-trial despite minimal study instruction and was perceived as helpful for asthma, suggesting that patients will likely adopt this strategy if implemented at a healthcare system level.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"378-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240014R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) strategy of enhancing usual care with rescue short-acting beta agonist (SABA) supplemented with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduces asthma exacerbations vs. usual care alone in Black and Latinx adults with moderate-severe asthma. We investigated post-trial PARTICS usage and patient perceptions of efficacy.

Methods: PREPARE trial participants randomized to the PARTICS intervention were surveyed an average of 29 months after trial exit.

Results: Of 600 PARTICS-assigned PREPARE trial participants, 505 consented to future research. Fifty-two percent (262/505) completed this survey. Forty-one percent (108/262) continued using PARTICS post-trial. Of these, 97% (105/108) reported that PARTICS helped to control their asthma. Thirty-four percent (37/108) switched from the trial provided QVAR® to other ICS brands due to insurance coverage or clinician issues (e.g., unwillingness to prescribe or misunderstanding of PARTICS; 65%, 24/37). Of those who stopped using PARTICS post-trial (59% [154/262]), 62% (95/154) reported using PARTICS until the PREPARE-provided ICS inhaler ran out, and 31% (47/154) reported not knowing that their asthma care clinician could prescribe it. Only 2% (5/154) of those not using PARTICS reported that it had not been helpful for asthma.

Conclusions: Continued PARTICS use was common >2 years post-trial despite minimal study instruction and was perceived as helpful for asthma, suggesting that patients will likely adopt this strategy if implemented at a healthcare system level.

试验后哮喘干预的维持:在黑人和拉丁裔患者中使用患者激活缓解触发吸入皮质类固醇(PARTICS)策略。
目的:在黑人和拉丁裔成人中重度哮喘患者中,患者激活缓解触发吸入皮质类固醇(PARTICS)策略加强常规护理,使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA)补充吸入皮质类固醇(ICS),与常规护理相比,可减少哮喘加重。我们调查了试验后PARTICS的使用情况和患者对疗效的看法。方法:在试验结束后平均29个月对随机分配到PARTICS干预组的prep试验参与者进行调查。结果:600名partis分配的PREPARE试验参与者中,505人同意未来的研究。52%(262/505)的人完成了这项调查。41%(108/262)的患者在试验后继续使用PARTICS。其中,97%(105/108)报告说,PARTICS有助于控制他们的哮喘。34%(37/108)的患者由于保险范围或临床医生的问题(例如,不愿意开处方或对PARTICS的误解;65%, 24/37)。在试验后停止使用PARTICS的患者中(59%[154/262]),62%(95/154)报告使用PARTICS直到prep提供的ICS吸入器用完,31%(47/154)报告不知道他们的哮喘护理临床医生可以开这种药。只有2%(5/154)未使用PARTICS的患者报告其对哮喘没有帮助。结论:在试验后2年,尽管有很少的研究指导,但持续使用PARTICS是很常见的,并且被认为对哮喘有帮助,这表明如果在医疗保健系统层面实施,患者可能会采用这种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信