Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients.
Juan Carlos Cardet, Jonathan M Bailey, Laura P Hurley, Nancy E Maher, Elizabeth W Staton, Barbara P Yawn, Sandra E Zaeh, Elliot Israel, Andrea J Apter, Phuong Bradford, Rafael A Calderon-Candelario, Jennifer K Carroll, Geoffrey L Chupp, Rubin Cohen, Brianna Ericson, Anne L Fuhlbrigge, Barbara M Kaplan, Jean M Kruse, Sylvette Nazario, Wilson D Pace, Magdalena Pasarica, Wanda Phipatanakul, Isaretta L Riley, Jacqueline Rodriguez-Louis, Kartik Shenoy, Paul M Stranges, Hazel Tapp, Michael E Wechsler
{"title":"Maintenance of an Asthma Intervention Post-Trial: Use of a Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) Strategy in Black and Latinx Patients.","authors":"Juan Carlos Cardet, Jonathan M Bailey, Laura P Hurley, Nancy E Maher, Elizabeth W Staton, Barbara P Yawn, Sandra E Zaeh, Elliot Israel, Andrea J Apter, Phuong Bradford, Rafael A Calderon-Candelario, Jennifer K Carroll, Geoffrey L Chupp, Rubin Cohen, Brianna Ericson, Anne L Fuhlbrigge, Barbara M Kaplan, Jean M Kruse, Sylvette Nazario, Wilson D Pace, Magdalena Pasarica, Wanda Phipatanakul, Isaretta L Riley, Jacqueline Rodriguez-Louis, Kartik Shenoy, Paul M Stranges, Hazel Tapp, Michael E Wechsler","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240014R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) strategy of enhancing usual care with rescue short-acting beta agonist (SABA) supplemented with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduces asthma exacerbations vs. usual care alone in Black and Latinx adults with moderate-severe asthma. We investigated post-trial PARTICS usage and patient perceptions of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PREPARE trial participants randomized to the PARTICS intervention were surveyed an average of 29 months after trial exit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 600 PARTICS-assigned PREPARE trial participants, 505 consented to future research. Fifty-two percent (262/505) completed this survey. Forty-one percent (108/262) continued using PARTICS post-trial. Of these, 97% (105/108) reported that PARTICS helped to control their asthma. Thirty-four percent (37/108) switched from the trial provided QVAR® to other ICS brands due to insurance coverage or clinician issues (e.g., unwillingness to prescribe or misunderstanding of PARTICS; 65%, 24/37). Of those who stopped using PARTICS post-trial (59% [154/262]), 62% (95/154) reported using PARTICS until the PREPARE-provided ICS inhaler ran out, and 31% (47/154) reported not knowing that their asthma care clinician could prescribe it. Only 2% (5/154) of those not using PARTICS reported that it had not been helpful for asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continued PARTICS use was common >2 years post-trial despite minimal study instruction and was perceived as helpful for asthma, suggesting that patients will likely adopt this strategy if implemented at a healthcare system level.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"378-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240014R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: A Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Corticosteroid (PARTICS) strategy of enhancing usual care with rescue short-acting beta agonist (SABA) supplemented with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduces asthma exacerbations vs. usual care alone in Black and Latinx adults with moderate-severe asthma. We investigated post-trial PARTICS usage and patient perceptions of efficacy.
Methods: PREPARE trial participants randomized to the PARTICS intervention were surveyed an average of 29 months after trial exit.
Results: Of 600 PARTICS-assigned PREPARE trial participants, 505 consented to future research. Fifty-two percent (262/505) completed this survey. Forty-one percent (108/262) continued using PARTICS post-trial. Of these, 97% (105/108) reported that PARTICS helped to control their asthma. Thirty-four percent (37/108) switched from the trial provided QVAR® to other ICS brands due to insurance coverage or clinician issues (e.g., unwillingness to prescribe or misunderstanding of PARTICS; 65%, 24/37). Of those who stopped using PARTICS post-trial (59% [154/262]), 62% (95/154) reported using PARTICS until the PREPARE-provided ICS inhaler ran out, and 31% (47/154) reported not knowing that their asthma care clinician could prescribe it. Only 2% (5/154) of those not using PARTICS reported that it had not been helpful for asthma.
Conclusions: Continued PARTICS use was common >2 years post-trial despite minimal study instruction and was perceived as helpful for asthma, suggesting that patients will likely adopt this strategy if implemented at a healthcare system level.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.