Identifying Strategies to Improve Implementation of Integrative Pain Management in Primary Care.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
E Marshall Brooks, Ashley Park, Karissa Tu, Wu-Hsun Tom Yang, Sebastian T Tong
{"title":"Identifying Strategies to Improve Implementation of Integrative Pain Management in Primary Care.","authors":"E Marshall Brooks, Ashley Park, Karissa Tu, Wu-Hsun Tom Yang, Sebastian T Tong","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240181R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mounting evidence supports the use of integrative pain management (IPM) in primary care settings. There is limited understanding of primary care clinicians' experiences, recommendations, and strategies for integrating IPM into clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 97 clinicians were contacted via e-mail from a listserv maintained by the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) region Practice and Research Network, a practice-based research network. A total of 23 clinicians completed a recruitment survey and 21 were contacted to schedule an in-depth interview. Interviews addressed knowledge of and approaches to IPM, barriers and facilitators integrating IPM into clinical care, and recommendations for future program design. Interviews were completed until saturation was reached and then were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. Participants were offered $100 for their participation in the interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 clinicians included 11 MDs, 1 PA, 1 LCSW, and 1 PharmD. Domains reported include strategies and perspectives on integrating IPM, system level improvements needed to increase access, clinical barriers to addressing chronic pain, and perceived patient level challenges. Key findings within these domains include the need for a paradigm shift in the approach to treating chronic pain, the importance of adaptability and flexibility, and challenges related to time, payment, and resource availability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As a specialty that focuses on whole-person, comprehensive care, family medicine is uniquely situated to integrate IPM into routine practice. Furthermore, ongoing collaboration with primary care clinicians such as behavioral health providers and pharmacists are synergistic toward these goals. However, challenges related to knowledge, comfort, payment, and resource availability must first be overcome within family medicine. This requires improving education on pain management in medical school and residency, increasing access to community referral networks with specialized knowledge in chronic pain, and expanding payments for nonpharmacologic and team-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240181R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mounting evidence supports the use of integrative pain management (IPM) in primary care settings. There is limited understanding of primary care clinicians' experiences, recommendations, and strategies for integrating IPM into clinical care.

Methods: A total of 97 clinicians were contacted via e-mail from a listserv maintained by the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) region Practice and Research Network, a practice-based research network. A total of 23 clinicians completed a recruitment survey and 21 were contacted to schedule an in-depth interview. Interviews addressed knowledge of and approaches to IPM, barriers and facilitators integrating IPM into clinical care, and recommendations for future program design. Interviews were completed until saturation was reached and then were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. Participants were offered $100 for their participation in the interview.

Results: A total of 14 clinicians included 11 MDs, 1 PA, 1 LCSW, and 1 PharmD. Domains reported include strategies and perspectives on integrating IPM, system level improvements needed to increase access, clinical barriers to addressing chronic pain, and perceived patient level challenges. Key findings within these domains include the need for a paradigm shift in the approach to treating chronic pain, the importance of adaptability and flexibility, and challenges related to time, payment, and resource availability.

Discussion: As a specialty that focuses on whole-person, comprehensive care, family medicine is uniquely situated to integrate IPM into routine practice. Furthermore, ongoing collaboration with primary care clinicians such as behavioral health providers and pharmacists are synergistic toward these goals. However, challenges related to knowledge, comfort, payment, and resource availability must first be overcome within family medicine. This requires improving education on pain management in medical school and residency, increasing access to community referral networks with specialized knowledge in chronic pain, and expanding payments for nonpharmacologic and team-based care.

确定策略以改善初级保健中综合疼痛管理的实施。
背景:越来越多的证据支持在初级保健机构中使用综合疼痛管理(IPM)。对初级保健临床医生将IPM纳入临床护理的经验、建议和策略的了解有限。方法:通过华盛顿、怀俄明、阿拉斯加、蒙大拿州和爱达荷州(WWAMI)地区实践与研究网络(一个基于实践的研究网络)维护的列表服务,通过电子邮件联系了97名临床医生。共有23名临床医生完成了招募调查,并联系了21名医生安排深入访谈。访谈涉及IPM的知识和方法,将IPM纳入临床护理的障碍和促进因素,以及对未来方案设计的建议。采访完成,直到达到饱和,然后转录和主题分析。参加面试的人可以得到100美元的报酬。结果:共有14名临床医生,包括11名md, 1名PA, 1名LCSW和1名PharmD。报告的领域包括整合IPM的策略和观点,增加获取所需的系统级改进,解决慢性疼痛的临床障碍,以及感知到的患者层面的挑战。这些领域的主要发现包括治疗慢性疼痛的方法需要范式转变,适应性和灵活性的重要性,以及与时间、支付和资源可用性相关的挑战。讨论:家庭医学作为一个专注于全人、全面护理的专业,具有将IPM纳入日常实践的独特地位。此外,与初级保健临床医生(如行为健康提供者和药剂师)的持续合作是实现这些目标的协同作用。然而,与知识、舒适、支付和资源可用性相关的挑战必须首先在家庭医学中克服。这就需要改善医学院和住院医师对疼痛管理的教育,增加获得慢性疼痛专业知识的社区转诊网络的机会,并扩大对非药物和团队护理的支付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信