Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Treatment Among African American Men.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrew Anderson, Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury, Sarah M Savaski, Louis S Krane
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Treatment Among African American Men.","authors":"Andrew Anderson, Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury, Sarah M Savaski, Louis S Krane","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240228R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American men face significant disparities in prostate cancer outcomes, influenced by low trust in health care providers and disparities in treatment quality. Shared decision making (SDM) is recommended to improve engagement and outcomes within this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 African American men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer within the Veterans Administration health system in Louisiana. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the interview guide development and qualitative data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 68.8 years; 53% held a high school diploma or GED, and 40% had higher education. Employment statuses included 27% retired and 53% employed part-time. Self-reported physical health was rated as \"poor/fair\" by 47% and mental health by 53%. We found that 46.67% believed health care organizations cover up mistakes, and 40% felt deceived or misled. Despite these concerns, 73.33% disagreed that mistakes are common. Regarding physician trust, 86.67% felt their doctor cared about them, but 66.67% believed their care was not comprehensive. However, 80% trusted their doctor's judgments, and 66.67% followed their doctor's advice. Participants highlighted gaps in prostate cancer awareness and varied prediagnosis health management practices. Social support varied; some relied heavily on family, while others preferred independence. Trust in health care providers was generally high despite past negative experiences and high physician turnover. The SDM process was valued, needing clearer communication about treatment options and side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While African American veterans generally trusted their physicians and valued the SDM process, significant mistrust toward health care organizations, concerns about comprehensive care, and gaps in prostate cancer awareness and health management practices highlight the need for improved communication and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"302-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240228R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: African American men face significant disparities in prostate cancer outcomes, influenced by low trust in health care providers and disparities in treatment quality. Shared decision making (SDM) is recommended to improve engagement and outcomes within this population.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 African American men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer within the Veterans Administration health system in Louisiana. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the interview guide development and qualitative data analysis.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 68.8 years; 53% held a high school diploma or GED, and 40% had higher education. Employment statuses included 27% retired and 53% employed part-time. Self-reported physical health was rated as "poor/fair" by 47% and mental health by 53%. We found that 46.67% believed health care organizations cover up mistakes, and 40% felt deceived or misled. Despite these concerns, 73.33% disagreed that mistakes are common. Regarding physician trust, 86.67% felt their doctor cared about them, but 66.67% believed their care was not comprehensive. However, 80% trusted their doctor's judgments, and 66.67% followed their doctor's advice. Participants highlighted gaps in prostate cancer awareness and varied prediagnosis health management practices. Social support varied; some relied heavily on family, while others preferred independence. Trust in health care providers was generally high despite past negative experiences and high physician turnover. The SDM process was valued, needing clearer communication about treatment options and side effects.

Conclusions: While African American veterans generally trusted their physicians and valued the SDM process, significant mistrust toward health care organizations, concerns about comprehensive care, and gaps in prostate cancer awareness and health management practices highlight the need for improved communication and support.

非裔美国男性前列腺癌治疗共同决策的障碍和促进因素。
背景:非洲裔美国男性在前列腺癌预后方面存在显著差异,这受对医疗保健提供者信任度低和治疗质量差异的影响。建议采用共同决策(SDM)来提高这一群体的参与度和成果。方法:对路易斯安那州退伍军人管理局卫生系统内诊断为早期前列腺癌的15名非裔美国男性进行半结构化访谈。理论领域框架指导访谈指南开发和定性数据分析。结果:参与者的平均年龄为68.8岁;53%的人拥有高中文凭或普通教育文凭,40%的人接受过高等教育。就业状况包括27%的退休人员和53%的兼职人员。47%的人认为自我报告的身体健康状况“差/一般”,53%的人认为心理健康状况“差/一般”。我们发现46.67%的人认为医疗机构掩盖了错误,40%的人觉得被欺骗或误导。尽管存在这些担忧,但73.33%的人不认为错误是常见的。在医生信任方面,86.67%的人认为医生关心自己,66.67%的人认为医生对自己的照顾不够全面。然而,80%的人相信医生的判断,66.67%的人听从医生的建议。与会者强调了在前列腺癌认识和各种诊断前健康管理实践方面的差距。社会支持多种多样;有些人非常依赖家庭,而另一些人则更喜欢独立。尽管过去的负面经历和医生的高流动率,但对卫生保健提供者的信任度总体较高。SDM过程是有价值的,需要关于治疗方案和副作用的更清晰的沟通。结论:虽然非裔美国退伍军人普遍信任他们的医生并重视SDM过程,但对医疗机构的严重不信任、对全面护理的担忧以及前列腺癌意识和健康管理实践的差距突出了改善沟通和支持的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信