Advances in Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Techniques used for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniations and Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brian Kwon, Andrew Moon
{"title":"Advances in Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Techniques used for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniations and Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Spinal Fusion.","authors":"Brian Kwon, Andrew Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic lumbar spine surgery has been practiced for decades but has recently gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique for treating the most common spinal pathologies treated by spine surgeons. These include lumbar disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and lumbar spinal fusion. This review provides comprehensive, up-to-date analyses of the two main approaches-uniportal and biportal endoscopy-utilized for discectomy, foraminotomy, laminectomy, and interbody fusion. The key advantages of endoscopic spine surgery include smaller incisions, less soft tissue disruption, reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times, all of which collectively contribute to positive patient outcomes. Advances in visualization and instrumentation as well as surgeon training and experience have expanded the indications for endoscopic spine surgery beyond herniated discs, allowing its application in more complex conditions, such as highly migrated disc herniations, spinal tumors, and trauma. Moreover, endoscopic surgery has shown promising results in special populations, such as obese patients, where traditional open approaches can be challenging. Despite its advantages, adopting endoscopic spine surgery poses several challenges: particularly a steep learning curve related to issues with depth perception, maneuvering instruments in narrow spaces, and managing technical pitfalls like dural tears and hemostasis. There are also limitations with endoscopic interbody fusions, in particular the use of smaller cages that have a limited fusion surface area and sagittal alignment; newer expandable cages may circumvent these shortcomings, however. As the body of literature demonstrates comparable, if not superior, outcomes to traditional open surgery, the adoption of endoscopic techniques is expected to increase. Continued innovation, surgeon education and experience, and most important, patient demand are driving the growth of this technique. It is the authors' opinions that in the near future, endoscopic spine surgery will become a fundamental approach utilized in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.06.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic lumbar spine surgery has been practiced for decades but has recently gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique for treating the most common spinal pathologies treated by spine surgeons. These include lumbar disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and lumbar spinal fusion. This review provides comprehensive, up-to-date analyses of the two main approaches-uniportal and biportal endoscopy-utilized for discectomy, foraminotomy, laminectomy, and interbody fusion. The key advantages of endoscopic spine surgery include smaller incisions, less soft tissue disruption, reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times, all of which collectively contribute to positive patient outcomes. Advances in visualization and instrumentation as well as surgeon training and experience have expanded the indications for endoscopic spine surgery beyond herniated discs, allowing its application in more complex conditions, such as highly migrated disc herniations, spinal tumors, and trauma. Moreover, endoscopic surgery has shown promising results in special populations, such as obese patients, where traditional open approaches can be challenging. Despite its advantages, adopting endoscopic spine surgery poses several challenges: particularly a steep learning curve related to issues with depth perception, maneuvering instruments in narrow spaces, and managing technical pitfalls like dural tears and hemostasis. There are also limitations with endoscopic interbody fusions, in particular the use of smaller cages that have a limited fusion surface area and sagittal alignment; newer expandable cages may circumvent these shortcomings, however. As the body of literature demonstrates comparable, if not superior, outcomes to traditional open surgery, the adoption of endoscopic techniques is expected to increase. Continued innovation, surgeon education and experience, and most important, patient demand are driving the growth of this technique. It is the authors' opinions that in the near future, endoscopic spine surgery will become a fundamental approach utilized in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine conditions.

腰椎内窥镜手术的进展:用于治疗腰椎间盘突出、椎管狭窄和腰椎融合术的技术的综合综述。
内窥镜腰椎手术已经实践了几十年,但最近作为一种微创技术被脊柱外科医生广泛应用于治疗最常见的脊柱病变。这些包括腰椎间盘突出、椎管狭窄和腰椎融合。这篇综述提供了全面的、最新的两种主要入路——单门静脉和双门静脉内窥镜——用于椎间盘切除术、椎间孔切开术、椎板切除术和椎间融合术。内窥镜脊柱手术的主要优点包括切口更小、软组织破坏更少、失血更少、住院时间更短、恢复时间更快,所有这些都有助于患者获得积极的结果。可视化和仪器的进步,以及外科医生的培训和经验,扩大了内窥镜脊柱手术的适应症,使其能够应用于更复杂的情况,如高度移位的椎间盘突出、脊柱肿瘤和创伤。此外,内窥镜手术在特殊人群(如肥胖患者)中显示出良好的效果,在这些人群中,传统的开放方法可能具有挑战性。尽管具有优势,但采用内窥镜脊柱手术也面临着一些挑战:特别是与深度感知相关的陡峭学习曲线,在狭窄空间中操作器械,以及管理硬脑膜撕裂和止血等技术缺陷。内窥镜椎体间融合也有局限性,特别是使用较小的融合器,其融合表面积和矢状排列有限;然而,较新的可扩展笼可能会克服这些缺点。由于大量文献表明,与传统开放手术相比,内窥镜技术的应用有望增加。持续的创新,外科医生的教育和经验,最重要的是,病人的需求正在推动这项技术的发展。作者认为,在不久的将来,内窥镜脊柱手术将成为治疗腰椎退行性疾病的基本方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信