A randomized controlled trial comparing sleep hygiene advice with a self-help book focusing on cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a study among patients with prescribed hypnotics from the GP.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bjørn Bjorvatn, Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ, Øystein Vedaa, Ståle Pallesen, Linn Nyjordet Evanger
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing sleep hygiene advice with a self-help book focusing on cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a study among patients with prescribed hypnotics from the GP.","authors":"Bjørn Bjorvatn, Ragnhild Stokke Lundetræ, Øystein Vedaa, Ståle Pallesen, Linn Nyjordet Evanger","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2525423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic insomnia is commonly treated with hypnotics. However, the treatment of choice is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi). We investigated whether a self-help book based on CBTi is effective in reducing hypnotic use and improving sleep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had received a prescription from their GP for z-hypnotics (zopiclone or zolpidem) in the last 6 months were recruited through PraksisNett, an infrastructure within General Practice, for a randomized controlled trial comparing written materials in form of a sheet of sleep hygiene advice and a self-help book. The participants completed an online questionnaire about hypnotic use, insomnia symptoms, sleep duration, anxiety and depression before the intervention and at 4-5 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 125 patients (response rate 72.7%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. Interaction analyses indicated effects favoring the self-help book for hypnotic use and anxiety. The book reduced the proportion using hypnotics daily from 25.4% to 18.6%, while the proportion increased from 21.2% to 22.7% in the sleep hygiene group. The proportion reporting anxiety was reduced from 32.1% to 23.2% in the self-help book group, while it increased from 27.0% to 31.7% in the sleep hygiene group. Insomnia symptoms were lowered in both intervention groups, whereas depression remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that the self-help book was an effective low-threshold treatment option that seems to reduce hypnotic use and at the same time improve sleep and mental health. The patients who received sleep hygiene advice also reported some positive effects, but daily hypnotic use and anxiety increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2525423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic insomnia is commonly treated with hypnotics. However, the treatment of choice is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi). We investigated whether a self-help book based on CBTi is effective in reducing hypnotic use and improving sleep.

Methods: Patients who had received a prescription from their GP for z-hypnotics (zopiclone or zolpidem) in the last 6 months were recruited through PraksisNett, an infrastructure within General Practice, for a randomized controlled trial comparing written materials in form of a sheet of sleep hygiene advice and a self-help book. The participants completed an online questionnaire about hypnotic use, insomnia symptoms, sleep duration, anxiety and depression before the intervention and at 4-5 months follow-up.

Results: In total, 125 patients (response rate 72.7%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. Interaction analyses indicated effects favoring the self-help book for hypnotic use and anxiety. The book reduced the proportion using hypnotics daily from 25.4% to 18.6%, while the proportion increased from 21.2% to 22.7% in the sleep hygiene group. The proportion reporting anxiety was reduced from 32.1% to 23.2% in the self-help book group, while it increased from 27.0% to 31.7% in the sleep hygiene group. Insomnia symptoms were lowered in both intervention groups, whereas depression remained unchanged.

Conclusion: This study indicated that the self-help book was an effective low-threshold treatment option that seems to reduce hypnotic use and at the same time improve sleep and mental health. The patients who received sleep hygiene advice also reported some positive effects, but daily hypnotic use and anxiety increased.

一项随机对照试验比较了睡眠卫生建议和专注于失眠认知行为疗法的自助书:一项对全科医生处方催眠药的患者的研究。
背景:慢性失眠通常用催眠药治疗。然而,治疗失眠的选择是认知行为疗法(CBTi)。我们调查了一本基于CBTi的自助书籍是否能有效地减少催眠的使用并改善睡眠。方法:通过PraksisNett(全科诊所的基础设施)招募过去6个月内从全科医生那里获得z-催眠药(唑匹克隆或唑吡坦)处方的患者,进行随机对照试验,比较睡眠卫生建议和自助书籍的书面材料。参与者在干预前和4-5个月的随访中完成了一份关于催眠使用、失眠症状、睡眠时间、焦虑和抑郁的在线问卷。结果:125例患者完成随访问卷,有效率72.7%。相互作用分析表明,自助书对催眠和焦虑的作用更大。这本书将每天使用催眠药的比例从25.4%降至18.6%,而睡眠卫生组的比例从21.2%上升至22.7%。在自助书籍组中,报告焦虑的比例从32.1%下降到23.2%,而在睡眠卫生组中,这一比例从27.0%上升到31.7%。两个干预组的失眠症状都有所减轻,而抑郁则保持不变。结论:本研究表明,自助书籍是一种有效的低阈值治疗选择,似乎可以减少催眠的使用,同时改善睡眠和心理健康。接受睡眠卫生建议的患者也报告了一些积极的效果,但日常催眠的使用和焦虑增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信