Statin Initiation and Dementia Incidence in a Large Health Care System From 1997 to 2020: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-07-22 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213855
Scott C Zimmerman, Minhyuk Choi, Chen Jiang, Erin L Ferguson, Thomas J Hoffmann, Kaitlin Swinnerton, Akinyemi Oni-Orisan, Paola Gilsanz, Travis J Meyers, Vidhu Choudhary, Rachel A Whitmer, Neil Risch, Ronald M Krauss, Catherine A Schaefer, M Maria Glymour
{"title":"Statin Initiation and Dementia Incidence in a Large Health Care System From 1997 to 2020: A Target Trial Emulation Study.","authors":"Scott C Zimmerman, Minhyuk Choi, Chen Jiang, Erin L Ferguson, Thomas J Hoffmann, Kaitlin Swinnerton, Akinyemi Oni-Orisan, Paola Gilsanz, Travis J Meyers, Vidhu Choudhary, Rachel A Whitmer, Neil Risch, Ronald M Krauss, Catherine A Schaefer, M Maria Glymour","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Previous research of associations between statins and Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (AD/ADRDs) has been limited by short follow-up, small samples, and confounding. We aimed to estimate the association between the 1st statin prescription and incident AD/ADRD among members of a large population-based cohort of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cohort study design emulating a target trial using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care delivery system. Participants were born before 1951 and KPNC members for 4+ years during 1997-2010. Embedded subsamples included sociodemographic and genetic data. Statin initiators were matched at first prescription (\"baseline\") with up to 5 \"noninitiators\" based on age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Participants with extreme propensity scores were excluded. The outcome was time to incident AD/ADRD diagnosis, censoring, or the administrative end of study (December 31, 2020). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for statin initiation on AD/ADRD incidence. Follow-up time was divided at the first year of follow-up to account for increased AD/ADRD detection in the first year due to increased interaction with the health care system after a statin prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 (\"initiators\"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). The average follow-up was 11.8 years. In the first year after initiating statins, AD/ADRD diagnoses were elevated by 46% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.53) compared with noninitiators. After 1 year, statin initiators experienced no difference in AD/ADRD incidence (full sample: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; subsample with survey covariates: HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06; subsample with survey and genetic covariates: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.07). Adjustment for sociodemographic covariates and <i>apolipoprotein E e4</i> allele count did not materially change the findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large emulated target trial, statin initiation was inconsistent with more than a 3% increase or decrease in the hazard of AD/ADRD after the first year of follow-up. This intent-to-treat analysis does not directly quantify effects of long-term exposure to statins. Associations in the first year likely reflect increased medical observation immediately after statin initiation.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This emulated trial provides Class II evidence that statin initiation is not associated with AD/ADRD or AD incidence after the first year of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"105 2","pages":"e213855"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Previous research of associations between statins and Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (AD/ADRDs) has been limited by short follow-up, small samples, and confounding. We aimed to estimate the association between the 1st statin prescription and incident AD/ADRD among members of a large population-based cohort of older adults.

Methods: We used a cohort study design emulating a target trial using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care delivery system. Participants were born before 1951 and KPNC members for 4+ years during 1997-2010. Embedded subsamples included sociodemographic and genetic data. Statin initiators were matched at first prescription ("baseline") with up to 5 "noninitiators" based on age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Participants with extreme propensity scores were excluded. The outcome was time to incident AD/ADRD diagnosis, censoring, or the administrative end of study (December 31, 2020). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for statin initiation on AD/ADRD incidence. Follow-up time was divided at the first year of follow-up to account for increased AD/ADRD detection in the first year due to increased interaction with the health care system after a statin prescription.

Results: Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 ("initiators"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). The average follow-up was 11.8 years. In the first year after initiating statins, AD/ADRD diagnoses were elevated by 46% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.53) compared with noninitiators. After 1 year, statin initiators experienced no difference in AD/ADRD incidence (full sample: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; subsample with survey covariates: HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06; subsample with survey and genetic covariates: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.07). Adjustment for sociodemographic covariates and apolipoprotein E e4 allele count did not materially change the findings.

Discussion: In this large emulated target trial, statin initiation was inconsistent with more than a 3% increase or decrease in the hazard of AD/ADRD after the first year of follow-up. This intent-to-treat analysis does not directly quantify effects of long-term exposure to statins. Associations in the first year likely reflect increased medical observation immediately after statin initiation.

Classification of evidence: This emulated trial provides Class II evidence that statin initiation is not associated with AD/ADRD or AD incidence after the first year of follow-up.

1997 - 2020年大型医疗保健系统中他汀类药物起始与痴呆发病率:一项目标试验模拟研究。
背景和目的:先前关于他汀类药物与阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRDs)之间关系的研究受到随访时间短、样本小和混杂的限制。我们的目的是估计在一个以人口为基础的老年人队列中,第一次他汀类药物处方与AD/ADRD事件之间的关系。方法:我们采用队列研究设计,模拟目标试验,使用综合医疗保健服务系统Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC)的数据。参与者均为1951年以前出生,1997-2010年期间为KPNC会员4年以上。嵌入的子样本包括社会人口统计和遗传数据。根据年龄和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),在首次处方时,他汀类药物的启动剂(“基线”)与多达5个“非启动剂”相匹配。具有极端倾向得分的参与者被排除在外。结果是到事件AD/ADRD诊断、审查或研究行政结束的时间(2020年12月31日)。Cox比例风险模型用于估计他汀类药物对AD/ADRD发病率的风险比。随访时间在随访的第一年进行划分,以考虑由于他汀类药物处方后与卫生保健系统的相互作用增加,第一年AD/ADRD检测增加。结果:在符合条件的参与者(n = 705,061)中,264,294人(占符合条件的参与者的37.5%)在2001-2010年期间服用了任何他汀类药物(“起始者”),其中249,613人(94.4%)与255,937名独特的非起始者相匹配,以创建分析样本(322,358名独特参与者;基线时平均年龄= 67.4岁;55.1%的女性)。平均随访时间为11.8年。在开始使用他汀类药物后的第一年,与未开始使用他汀类药物的患者相比,AD/ADRD诊断增加了46%(风险比[HR] = 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.53)。1年后,他汀类药物在AD/ADRD发生率方面没有差异(全样本:HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01;具有调查协变量的子样本:HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06;具有调查和遗传协变量的子样本:HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.07)。调整社会人口学协变量和载脂蛋白ee4等位基因计数并没有实质性地改变研究结果。讨论:在这项大型模拟靶试验中,他汀类药物的起始治疗与第一年随访后AD/ADRD风险增加或减少超过3%的结果不一致。这种意向治疗分析并没有直接量化长期暴露于他汀类药物的影响。第一年的关联可能反映了他汀类药物开始使用后立即增加的医学观察。证据分类:该模拟试验提供了II级证据,表明他汀类药物的起始治疗与AD/ADRD或第一年随访后AD发病率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信