Association of non-English language preference with tumor characteristics and postoperative outcomes following pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resection: a retrospective review of 1143 cases.
Daniel Quintana, Rithvik Ramesh, Wesley Shoap, Robert C Osorio, Christian Jimenez, Philip V Theodosopoulos, Sandeep Kunwar, José Gurrola, Ivan H El-Sayed, Manish K Aghi, Ezequiel Goldschmidt
{"title":"Association of non-English language preference with tumor characteristics and postoperative outcomes following pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resection:\u2028a retrospective review of 1143 cases.","authors":"Daniel Quintana, Rithvik Ramesh, Wesley Shoap, Robert C Osorio, Christian Jimenez, Philip V Theodosopoulos, Sandeep Kunwar, José Gurrola, Ivan H El-Sayed, Manish K Aghi, Ezequiel Goldschmidt","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.JNS241308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-English language preference (NELP) poses a barrier to healthcare access and may contribute to delays in seeking care, understanding treatment plans, and communicating health concerns. This study assesses the relationship between NELP and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) at a high-volume tertiary center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1143 adult patients who underwent PitNET surgery between 2012 and 2019 at a single institution. Clinical and radiological variables were recorded for NELP patients and compared to patients with English language preference (ELP). Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were used to assess associations between NELP, tumor characteristics, and postoperative outcomes, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1143 patients, 14.0% had NELP, with Spanish being the predominant language. NELP patients had larger tumor diameters (median [IQR] 2.0 [1.5-2.8] cm vs 1.5 [0.9-2.2] cm, p < 0.001) and higher rates of government insurance (78.2% vs 44.8%, p < 0.001), diagnosis during emergency department presentation (21.3% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001), cavernous sinus invasion (50.6% vs 30.7%, p < 0.001), and tumor apoplexy (8.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.011), but they were less likely to present with preoperative endocrine disease (23.1% vs 41.6%, p < 0.001), and had shorter times to surgery (median [IQR] 79 [34.0-248.5] days vs 113 [53.0-430.8] days, p = 0.002) compared to ELP patients. NELP patients also had longer length of stay (LOS) (median [IQR] 2.00 [1.00-4.00] days vs 1.00 [1.00-2.00] days, p = 0.005) and higher lumbar drain placement rate (16.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.002). In multivariable models, NELP was significantly associated with higher incidence rates of cavernous sinus invasion (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.78, p < 0.001) and macroadenoma (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.95-11.06, p < 0.001), prolonged LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.67, p = 0.004), and a lower rate of preoperative endocrine dysfunction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.92, p = 0.02), after adjustment for confounders. There were no significant differences in apoplexy at presentation, 30-day readmission rates, or lumbar drain use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NELP remained an independent risk factor for complex tumor presentation and extended hospital stay after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Understanding how NELP interacts with other health disparities in neurosurgical care can guide strategies to better support this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.JNS241308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Non-English language preference (NELP) poses a barrier to healthcare access and may contribute to delays in seeking care, understanding treatment plans, and communicating health concerns. This study assesses the relationship between NELP and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) at a high-volume tertiary center.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1143 adult patients who underwent PitNET surgery between 2012 and 2019 at a single institution. Clinical and radiological variables were recorded for NELP patients and compared to patients with English language preference (ELP). Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were used to assess associations between NELP, tumor characteristics, and postoperative outcomes, adjusting for confounders.
Results: Of the 1143 patients, 14.0% had NELP, with Spanish being the predominant language. NELP patients had larger tumor diameters (median [IQR] 2.0 [1.5-2.8] cm vs 1.5 [0.9-2.2] cm, p < 0.001) and higher rates of government insurance (78.2% vs 44.8%, p < 0.001), diagnosis during emergency department presentation (21.3% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001), cavernous sinus invasion (50.6% vs 30.7%, p < 0.001), and tumor apoplexy (8.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.011), but they were less likely to present with preoperative endocrine disease (23.1% vs 41.6%, p < 0.001), and had shorter times to surgery (median [IQR] 79 [34.0-248.5] days vs 113 [53.0-430.8] days, p = 0.002) compared to ELP patients. NELP patients also had longer length of stay (LOS) (median [IQR] 2.00 [1.00-4.00] days vs 1.00 [1.00-2.00] days, p = 0.005) and higher lumbar drain placement rate (16.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.002). In multivariable models, NELP was significantly associated with higher incidence rates of cavernous sinus invasion (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.78, p < 0.001) and macroadenoma (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.95-11.06, p < 0.001), prolonged LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.67, p = 0.004), and a lower rate of preoperative endocrine dysfunction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.92, p = 0.02), after adjustment for confounders. There were no significant differences in apoplexy at presentation, 30-day readmission rates, or lumbar drain use.
Conclusions: NELP remained an independent risk factor for complex tumor presentation and extended hospital stay after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Understanding how NELP interacts with other health disparities in neurosurgical care can guide strategies to better support this patient population.
目的:非英语语言偏好(NELP)对医疗保健服务的获取构成障碍,并可能导致寻求护理、理解治疗计划和沟通健康问题的延误。本研究在高容量三级中心评估NELP与垂体神经内分泌肿瘤(PitNETs)患者的临床特征和预后之间的关系。方法:对2012年至2019年在同一医院接受PitNET手术的1143例成年患者进行回顾性分析。记录NELP患者的临床和放射学变量,并与英语语言偏好(ELP)患者进行比较。采用多变量logistic和负二项回归分析来评估NELP、肿瘤特征和术后结果之间的关系,并对混杂因素进行调整。结果:1143例患者中,14.0%患有NELP,以西班牙语为主要语言。NELP患者肿瘤直径较大(中位数[IQR] 2.0 [1.5-2.8] cm vs 1.5 [0.9-2.2] cm, p < 0.001),政府保险比例(78.2% vs 44.8%, p < 0.001),急诊科诊断(21.3% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001),海绵窦侵犯(50.6% vs 30.7%, p < 0.001),肿瘤卒中(8.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.011),但术前出现内分泌疾病的可能性较小(23.1% vs 41.6%, p < 0.001)。与ELP患者相比,手术时间更短(中位[IQR] 79[34.0-248.5]天对113[53.0-430.8]天,p = 0.002)。NELP患者的住院时间(LOS)也更长(中位[IQR] 2.00[1.00-4.00]天vs 1.00[1.00-2.00]天,p = 0.005),腰椎引流管放置率更高(16.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.002)。在多变量模型中,调整混杂因素后,NELP与较高的海绵窦侵袭发生率(OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31-2.78, p < 0.001)和大腺瘤发生率(OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.95-11.06, p < 0.001)、延长的LOS(发生率比1.35,95% CI 1.10-1.67, p = 0.004)和较低的术前内分泌功能障碍发生率(OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.92, p = 0.02)显著相关。两组在首发时卒中、30天再入院率或腰椎引流管使用方面无显著差异。结论:在控制社会人口因素后,NELP仍然是复杂肿瘤表现和延长住院时间的独立危险因素。了解NELP如何与神经外科护理中的其他健康差异相互作用,可以指导更好地支持这一患者群体的策略。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.