Meredith Marefat, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed
{"title":"Weight Categories Have no Impact on Mortality in Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).","authors":"Meredith Marefat, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed","doi":"10.1177/08850666251351574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a critical support system for patients with acute and severe cardiac and respiratory failure. This study investigates the impact of different patient body weight categories on the mortality rates of patients undergoing ECMO support.MethodsUsing the Nationwide Sample (NIS) database and ICD-10 codes for 2016 to 2020 in adults over age 18, we evaluated total mortality based on weight categories compared to normal weights using univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsA total population of 47 990 patients underwent ECMO insertion with a mean age of 52.6 years. Total mortality was 45.7%. Patients with cachexia, overweight, and obesity had similar mortality to normal-weight patients. (Cachexia: 43.75%, normal weight: 46.30%, <i>p</i> = .60, OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.61-1.33, overweight 42.31%, <i>p</i> = .69, OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.38-1.89, and obesity 45.73%, <i>p</i> = .73, OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.12). However, morbid obesity had the lowest mortality in the univariate analysis (41.89%, <i>p</i> = .01, OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96) but was not significant in the multivariate analysis (<i>p</i> = .66, OR: 0.97, CI: 0.83-1.12). Separating peripheral veno-arterial versus veno-venous ECMO showed similar results with similar mortalities based on weight categories.ConclusionsOur data suggest that the 'obesity paradox' does not exist in ECMO-treated patients, with no effect of weight on total mortality . Further research is necessary to understand the underlying factors contributing to these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251351574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251351574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a critical support system for patients with acute and severe cardiac and respiratory failure. This study investigates the impact of different patient body weight categories on the mortality rates of patients undergoing ECMO support.MethodsUsing the Nationwide Sample (NIS) database and ICD-10 codes for 2016 to 2020 in adults over age 18, we evaluated total mortality based on weight categories compared to normal weights using univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsA total population of 47 990 patients underwent ECMO insertion with a mean age of 52.6 years. Total mortality was 45.7%. Patients with cachexia, overweight, and obesity had similar mortality to normal-weight patients. (Cachexia: 43.75%, normal weight: 46.30%, p = .60, OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.61-1.33, overweight 42.31%, p = .69, OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.38-1.89, and obesity 45.73%, p = .73, OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.12). However, morbid obesity had the lowest mortality in the univariate analysis (41.89%, p = .01, OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96) but was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = .66, OR: 0.97, CI: 0.83-1.12). Separating peripheral veno-arterial versus veno-venous ECMO showed similar results with similar mortalities based on weight categories.ConclusionsOur data suggest that the 'obesity paradox' does not exist in ECMO-treated patients, with no effect of weight on total mortality . Further research is necessary to understand the underlying factors contributing to these outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.