Development and psychometric evaluation of the fear of medical imaging radiation scale (FOMIRS): insights from multimethod analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lin-Sen Feng, Si-Rong She, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Jia-Qi Xie, Zheng-Jiao Dong, Ai Tang, Yin-Zhu Li, Xiao-Qian Wu, Qing Yang, Hao-Yu Wang, San-Bin Wang
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of the fear of medical imaging radiation scale (FOMIRS): insights from multimethod analysis.","authors":"Lin-Sen Feng, Si-Rong She, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Jia-Qi Xie, Zheng-Jiao Dong, Ai Tang, Yin-Zhu Li, Xiao-Qian Wu, Qing Yang, Hao-Yu Wang, San-Bin Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02018-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fear of medical imaging radiation (FOMIR) may influence disease screening willingness; however, no validated tool currently exists to assess FOMIR. This study aimed to develop and validate the Fear of Medical Imaging Radiation Scale (FOMIRS) and explore its psychological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on classical test theory, the FOMIRS was developed through semi-structured interviews, grounded theory, and Delphi consultation. A cross-sectional survey with 1509 participants was conducted in Yunnan Province from September to December 2024. Psychometric properties were evaluated using construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, content validity, and internal consistency. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the critical thresholds. Logistic regression analysis, network analysis, and structural equation modeling were employed to examine the relationships between the FOMIRS and related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FOMIRS consisted of 18 items organized into a two-dimensional structure. It demonstrated good model fit (Goodness-of-fit index = 0.909, Comparative fit index = 0.949), convergent validity (AVE > 0.45, CR > 0.80), discriminant validity (HTMT = 0.574), criterion-related validity (γ = 0.441), and content validity (S-CVI = 0.889). The FOMIRS also showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.926 and McDonald's ω = 0.935). Cost-induced refusal of imaging examinations, cancer screening willingness, online learning, imaging radiation cognition, and fear of cancer were identified as influencing factors of FOMIR (p < 0.05). FOMIR serves as a core node in the network, and imaging radiation cognition may affect cancer screening willingness through this mechanism (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FOMIRS accurately measures individual FOMIR levels. It captures the psychological characteristics and behavioral tendencies associated with FOMIR and indicates potential mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>We developed the Fear of Medical Imaging Radiation Scale (FOMIRS), a psychometric tool measuring individuals' fear of medical imaging radiation (FOMIR), demonstrating good reliability, validity, and practical application potential.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Evaluating individuals' FOMIR improves compliance with imaging exams and reduces related cognitive biases. FOMIRS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring FOMIR levels, capturing psychological and behavioral traits, and revealing interactions with external features. FOMIR is a complex phenomenon involving psychological traits, behavioral tendencies, and cognitive biases that affect people's willingness to undergo cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02018-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fear of medical imaging radiation (FOMIR) may influence disease screening willingness; however, no validated tool currently exists to assess FOMIR. This study aimed to develop and validate the Fear of Medical Imaging Radiation Scale (FOMIRS) and explore its psychological mechanisms.

Methods: Based on classical test theory, the FOMIRS was developed through semi-structured interviews, grounded theory, and Delphi consultation. A cross-sectional survey with 1509 participants was conducted in Yunnan Province from September to December 2024. Psychometric properties were evaluated using construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, content validity, and internal consistency. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the critical thresholds. Logistic regression analysis, network analysis, and structural equation modeling were employed to examine the relationships between the FOMIRS and related variables.

Results: The FOMIRS consisted of 18 items organized into a two-dimensional structure. It demonstrated good model fit (Goodness-of-fit index = 0.909, Comparative fit index = 0.949), convergent validity (AVE > 0.45, CR > 0.80), discriminant validity (HTMT = 0.574), criterion-related validity (γ = 0.441), and content validity (S-CVI = 0.889). The FOMIRS also showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.926 and McDonald's ω = 0.935). Cost-induced refusal of imaging examinations, cancer screening willingness, online learning, imaging radiation cognition, and fear of cancer were identified as influencing factors of FOMIR (p < 0.05). FOMIR serves as a core node in the network, and imaging radiation cognition may affect cancer screening willingness through this mechanism (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: FOMIRS accurately measures individual FOMIR levels. It captures the psychological characteristics and behavioral tendencies associated with FOMIR and indicates potential mechanisms.

Critical relevance statement: We developed the Fear of Medical Imaging Radiation Scale (FOMIRS), a psychometric tool measuring individuals' fear of medical imaging radiation (FOMIR), demonstrating good reliability, validity, and practical application potential.

Key points: Evaluating individuals' FOMIR improves compliance with imaging exams and reduces related cognitive biases. FOMIRS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring FOMIR levels, capturing psychological and behavioral traits, and revealing interactions with external features. FOMIR is a complex phenomenon involving psychological traits, behavioral tendencies, and cognitive biases that affect people's willingness to undergo cancer screening.

医学成像辐射量表(FOMIRS)的发展和心理测量学评估:来自多方法分析的见解。
目的:医学影像辐射恐惧(FOMIR)对疾病筛查意愿的影响;然而,目前还没有有效的工具来评估FOMIR。本研究旨在开发和验证医学影像辐射恐惧量表(FOMIRS),并探讨其心理机制。方法:以经典测试理论为基础,采用半结构化访谈、扎根理论和德尔菲咨询等方法编制FOMIRS。本文于2024年9月至12月在云南省对1509名参与者进行了横断面调查。采用构念效度、收敛效度、区别效度、标准相关效度、内容效度和内部一致性来评估心理测量特性。采用ROC曲线分析确定临界阈值。采用Logistic回归分析、网络分析和结构方程模型对FOMIRS与相关变量之间的关系进行了检验。结果:FOMIRS由18个条目组成二维结构。模型拟合良好(拟合优度指数= 0.909,比较拟合指数= 0.949),收敛效度(AVE > 0.45, CR > 0.80),判别效度(HTMT = 0.574),标度相关效度(γ = 0.441),内容效度(S-CVI = 0.889)。FOMIRS也表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.926, McDonald’s ω = 0.935)。成本因素导致的影像学检查拒绝、癌症筛查意愿、在线学习、影像学辐射认知和对癌症的恐惧是影响FOMIR的因素(p结论:FOMIRS准确测量个体FOMIR水平。它捕获了与FOMIR相关的心理特征和行为倾向,并指出了潜在的机制。关键相关性声明:我们开发了医学成像辐射恐惧量表(FOMIRS),这是一种测量个体对医学成像辐射恐惧的心理测量工具,具有良好的信度、效度和实际应用潜力。重点:评估个体的FOMIR提高了影像学检查的依从性,减少了相关的认知偏差。FOMIRS是一个可靠和有效的工具,用于测量FOMIR水平,捕捉心理和行为特征,并揭示与外部特征的相互作用。FOMIR是一种复杂的现象,涉及影响人们接受癌症筛查意愿的心理特征、行为倾向和认知偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信