A multi-view CNN model to predict resolving of new lung nodules on follow-up low-dose chest CT.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jingxuan Wang, Xiaowen Zhang, Wei Tang, Marcel van Tuinen, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter van Ooijen
{"title":"A multi-view CNN model to predict resolving of new lung nodules on follow-up low-dose chest CT.","authors":"Jingxuan Wang, Xiaowen Zhang, Wei Tang, Marcel van Tuinen, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter van Ooijen","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02000-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>New, intermediate-sized nodules in lung cancer screening undergo follow-up CT, but some of these will resolve. We evaluated the performance of a multi-view convolutional neural network (CNN) in distinguishing resolving and non-resolving new, intermediate-sized lung nodules.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilized data on 344 intermediate-sized nodules (50-500 mm<sup>3</sup>) in 250 participants from the NELSON (Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening) trial. We implemented four-fold cross-validation for model training and testing. A multi-view CNN model was developed by combining three two-dimensional (2D) CNN models and one three-dimensional (3D) CNN model. We used 2D, 2.5D, and 3D models for comparison. The models' performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Specificity, indicating what percentage of non-resolving nodules requiring follow-up can be correctly predicted, was maximized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all nodules, 18.3% (63) were resolving. The multi-view CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.81, with a mean sensitivity of 0.63 (SD, 0.15) and a mean specificity of 0.93 (SD, 0.02). The model significantly improved performance compared to 2D, 2.5D, or 3D models (p < 0.05). Under the premise of specificity greater than 90% (meaning < 10% of non-resolving nodules are incorrectly identified as resolving), follow-up CT in 14% of individuals could be prevented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multi-view CNN model achieved high specificity in discriminating new intermediate nodules that would need follow-up CT by identifying non-resolving nodules. After further validation and optimization, this model may assist with decision-making when new intermediate nodules are found in lung cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>The multi-view CNN-based model has the potential to reduce unnecessary follow-up scans when new nodules are detected, aiding radiologists in making earlier, more informed decisions.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Predicting the resolution of new intermediate lung nodules in lung cancer screening CT is a challenge. Our multi-view CNN model showed an AUC of 0.81, a specificity of 0.93, and a sensitivity of 0.63 at the nodule level. The multi-view model demonstrated a significant improvement in AUC compared to the three 2D models, one 2.5D model, and one 3D model.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02000-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: New, intermediate-sized nodules in lung cancer screening undergo follow-up CT, but some of these will resolve. We evaluated the performance of a multi-view convolutional neural network (CNN) in distinguishing resolving and non-resolving new, intermediate-sized lung nodules.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study utilized data on 344 intermediate-sized nodules (50-500 mm3) in 250 participants from the NELSON (Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening) trial. We implemented four-fold cross-validation for model training and testing. A multi-view CNN model was developed by combining three two-dimensional (2D) CNN models and one three-dimensional (3D) CNN model. We used 2D, 2.5D, and 3D models for comparison. The models' performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Specificity, indicating what percentage of non-resolving nodules requiring follow-up can be correctly predicted, was maximized.

Results: Among all nodules, 18.3% (63) were resolving. The multi-view CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.81, with a mean sensitivity of 0.63 (SD, 0.15) and a mean specificity of 0.93 (SD, 0.02). The model significantly improved performance compared to 2D, 2.5D, or 3D models (p < 0.05). Under the premise of specificity greater than 90% (meaning < 10% of non-resolving nodules are incorrectly identified as resolving), follow-up CT in 14% of individuals could be prevented.

Conclusion: The multi-view CNN model achieved high specificity in discriminating new intermediate nodules that would need follow-up CT by identifying non-resolving nodules. After further validation and optimization, this model may assist with decision-making when new intermediate nodules are found in lung cancer screening.

Critical relevance statement: The multi-view CNN-based model has the potential to reduce unnecessary follow-up scans when new nodules are detected, aiding radiologists in making earlier, more informed decisions.

Key points: Predicting the resolution of new intermediate lung nodules in lung cancer screening CT is a challenge. Our multi-view CNN model showed an AUC of 0.81, a specificity of 0.93, and a sensitivity of 0.63 at the nodule level. The multi-view model demonstrated a significant improvement in AUC compared to the three 2D models, one 2.5D model, and one 3D model.

多视点CNN模型预测随访低剂量胸部CT新发肺结节的分解。
目的:肺癌筛查中出现的新发、中等大小的结节需要随访CT,但其中一些结节会消失。我们评估了多视图卷积神经网络(CNN)在区分分辨和不分辨新的、中等大小的肺结节方面的性能。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究利用了来自NELSON(荷兰-比利时随机肺癌筛查)试验的250名参与者的344例中等大小结节(50-500 mm3)的数据。我们对模型训练和测试实施了四重交叉验证。将三个二维(2D) CNN模型和一个三维(3D) CNN模型相结合,建立了一个多视图CNN模型。我们使用2D、2.5D和3D模型进行比较。通过灵敏度、特异性和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能。特异性,表明需要随访的未解决结节的百分比可以正确预测,被最大化。结果:63例(18.3%)结节痊愈。多视图CNN模型的AUC为0.81,平均灵敏度为0.63 (SD, 0.15),平均特异性为0.93 (SD, 0.02)。与2D、2.5D或3D模型相比,该模型的性能显著提高(p)。结论:通过识别非分辨性结节,多视图CNN模型在鉴别需要随访CT的新发中间结节方面具有很高的特异性。经过进一步的验证和优化,该模型可以在肺癌筛查中发现新的中间结节时辅助决策。关键相关性声明:当检测到新的结节时,基于cnn的多视图模型有可能减少不必要的后续扫描,帮助放射科医生做出更早,更明智的决定。重点:预测肺癌CT筛查中新发中间肺结节的分辨率是一个挑战。我们的多视图CNN模型在结节水平上的AUC为0.81,特异性为0.93,敏感性为0.63。与三种2D模型、一种2.5D模型和一种3D模型相比,多视图模型的AUC有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信