Perioperative outcomes and technical and patient-reported success of rigid occipitocervical fusions in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexander O Aguirre, Mohamed A R Soliman, Isabelle G Stockman, Gaitree R Boojraj, Esteban Quiceno, Asham Khan, Kyungduk Rho, John Pollina, Jeffrey P Mullin
{"title":"Perioperative outcomes and technical and patient-reported success of rigid occipitocervical fusions in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alexander O Aguirre, Mohamed A R Soliman, Isabelle G Stockman, Gaitree R Boojraj, Esteban Quiceno, Asham Khan, Kyungduk Rho, John Pollina, Jeffrey P Mullin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09051-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Occipitocervical (OC) fusions are uncommon and challenging surgeries as patients have a wide range of pathologies that could necessitate this procedure. Due to this rarity, limited outcomes data are available for OC fusions. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis on the topic of OC fusions with a specific focus on the current preference of treatment with rigid constructs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of the Embase and PubMed databases was completed from each database's earliest records to April 23, 2024. Studies were included if they focused on rigid construct methods for OC fusions in adults. Meta-analysis was completed adhering to the random effects models, where continuous variables were analyzed with pooled-weighted means (95% confidence intervals [CI]) and categorical variables with pooled-weighted prevalence rates (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies, encompassing 1,274 patients, were included in this study. Included patients had a mean age of 57.18 years (CI, 52.21-62.15; I<sup>2</sup> = 94.47%), with women representing 57.2% (CI, 50.14-64.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 53%) of the population. Successful bony fusion was found in 96.7% (CI, 92.54-98.59; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) of cases, with reoperation occurring in 4.7% (CI, 2.62-8.36; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) of patients. Surgical site infection was the most common complication at a rate of 6.97% (CI, 5.19-9.29; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), followed by cerebrospinal fluid leak at 2.9% (CI, 1.32-6.36; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), instrumentation failure at 2.6% (CI, 1.16-5.71; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), vertebral artery injury at 1.6% (CI, 0.74-3.61; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and screw loosening at 1.4% (CI, 0.65-3.16; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rigid OC fusions have an extremely high likelihood of successful bony fusion and lower complication rates than those previously published, demonstrating a promising current state and future for the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09051-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Occipitocervical (OC) fusions are uncommon and challenging surgeries as patients have a wide range of pathologies that could necessitate this procedure. Due to this rarity, limited outcomes data are available for OC fusions. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis on the topic of OC fusions with a specific focus on the current preference of treatment with rigid constructs.

Methods: A literature search of the Embase and PubMed databases was completed from each database's earliest records to April 23, 2024. Studies were included if they focused on rigid construct methods for OC fusions in adults. Meta-analysis was completed adhering to the random effects models, where continuous variables were analyzed with pooled-weighted means (95% confidence intervals [CI]) and categorical variables with pooled-weighted prevalence rates (CI).

Results: A total of 42 studies, encompassing 1,274 patients, were included in this study. Included patients had a mean age of 57.18 years (CI, 52.21-62.15; I2 = 94.47%), with women representing 57.2% (CI, 50.14-64.03; I2 = 53%) of the population. Successful bony fusion was found in 96.7% (CI, 92.54-98.59; I2 = 0%) of cases, with reoperation occurring in 4.7% (CI, 2.62-8.36; I2 = 0%) of patients. Surgical site infection was the most common complication at a rate of 6.97% (CI, 5.19-9.29; I2 = 0%), followed by cerebrospinal fluid leak at 2.9% (CI, 1.32-6.36; I2 = 0%), instrumentation failure at 2.6% (CI, 1.16-5.71; I2 = 0%), vertebral artery injury at 1.6% (CI, 0.74-3.61; I2 = 0%), and screw loosening at 1.4% (CI, 0.65-3.16; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion: Rigid OC fusions have an extremely high likelihood of successful bony fusion and lower complication rates than those previously published, demonstrating a promising current state and future for the procedure.

成人刚性枕颈融合的围手术期结果、技术和患者报告的成功:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:枕颈(OC)融合是一种罕见且具有挑战性的手术,因为患者有广泛的病理,可能需要这种手术。由于这种罕见性,可用于OC融合的结果数据有限。据作者所知,这是第一个关于骨肉瘤融合主题的荟萃分析,特别关注目前使用刚性结构治疗的偏好。方法:检索Embase和PubMed数据库至2024年4月23日的文献。如果研究集中于成人OC融合的刚性构造方法,则纳入研究。采用随机效应模型完成meta分析,其中连续变量采用合并加权均值(95%置信区间[CI])分析,分类变量采用合并加权患病率(CI)分析。结果:本研究共纳入42项研究,包括1,274例患者。纳入的患者平均年龄为57.18岁(CI, 52.21-62.15;I2 = 94.47%),女性占57.2% (CI, 50.14-64.03;I2 = 53%)。96.7%的患者骨融合成功(CI, 92.54 ~ 98.59;I2 = 0%),再手术发生率为4.7% (CI, 2.62 ~ 8.36;I2 = 0%)。手术部位感染是最常见的并发症,发生率为6.97% (CI, 5.19-9.29;I2 = 0%),其次是脑脊液漏,为2.9% (CI, 1.32-6.36;I2 = 0%),仪器失效率为2.6% (CI, 1.16-5.71;I2 = 0%),椎动脉损伤1.6% (CI, 0.74-3.61;I2 = 0%),螺钉松动为1.4% (CI, 0.65-3.16;i2 = 0%)。结论:刚性OC融合具有极高的成功骨融合的可能性和较低的并发症发生率,表明该手术的现状和未来是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信