Effects of intravaginal conjugated oestrogen on pessary continuation for pelvic organ prolapse: multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Ying Zhou, Rusha Yin, Yuelun Zhang, Xuemei Wang, Fengbin Jin, Xiangjuan Li, Cheng Peng, Ping Wang, Haiyan Shen, Qiao Weng, Hongbin Xie, Hong Wang, Bengui Jiang, Kai Zhou, Nannan Liang, Yinghui He, Yingying Dai, Zheng Fang, Shuo Liang, Yiwei Zhang, Abraham Morse, Lan Zhu
{"title":"Effects of intravaginal conjugated oestrogen on pessary continuation for pelvic organ prolapse: multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.","authors":"Ying Zhou, Rusha Yin, Yuelun Zhang, Xuemei Wang, Fengbin Jin, Xiangjuan Li, Cheng Peng, Ping Wang, Haiyan Shen, Qiao Weng, Hongbin Xie, Hong Wang, Bengui Jiang, Kai Zhou, Nannan Liang, Yinghui He, Yingying Dai, Zheng Fang, Shuo Liang, Yiwei Zhang, Abraham Morse, Lan Zhu","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2025-084418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effect of vaginal oestrogen cream on pessary continuation rates in pelvic organ prolapse.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>12 academic medical centres in China (May 2020-June 2023).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse ≥stage 2 and successfully fitted with ring pessaries were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oestrogen cream or placebo cream.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>One gram of conjugated oestrogen cream (0.625 mg/g) or placebo cream was inserted vaginally every night for the first two weeks after successful pessary fitting followed by twice weekly for 12 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the pessary continuation rate with satisfaction, which was defined as the proportion of participants who continued using the pessary and reported a response of very much better or much better on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pelvic floor symptoms and adverse events. All analyses were based on a modified intention-to-treat approach, including participants who had at least one visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 420 postmenopausal women randomised, 411 had at least one visit and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (208 in the vaginal oestrogen group and 203 in the placebo group). The mean age of participants was 66 years. Pessary continuation rate with satisfaction did not differ significantly between the oestrogen group and the placebo group (181/208 (87.0%) <i>v</i> 176/203 (86.7%); risk difference 0.3%, 95% confidence interval -6.2% to 6.9%; P=0.92). Excessive discharge (34/208 (16.3%) <i>v</i> 52/203 (25.6%); -9.3%, -17.1% to -1.4%), vaginal erosion or ulcer (4/208 (1.9%) <i>v</i> 14/203 (6.9%); -5.0%, -8.9% to -1.0%), and vaginal bleeding (3/208 (1.4%) <i>v</i> 13/203 (6.4%); -5.0%, -8.7% to -1.2%) were less common in the vaginal oestrogen group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oestrogen cream did not improve the continuation rate of ring pessary use with satisfaction. Use of oestrogen cream might be associated with a lower risk of common adverse events. The clinical decision to use vaginal oestrogen should take into account its benefits and risks and the patient's personal preferences.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04393194.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":"389 ","pages":"e084418"},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-084418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of vaginal oestrogen cream on pessary continuation rates in pelvic organ prolapse.

Design: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

Setting: 12 academic medical centres in China (May 2020-June 2023).

Participants: Postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse ≥stage 2 and successfully fitted with ring pessaries were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oestrogen cream or placebo cream.

Interventions: One gram of conjugated oestrogen cream (0.625 mg/g) or placebo cream was inserted vaginally every night for the first two weeks after successful pessary fitting followed by twice weekly for 12 months.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the pessary continuation rate with satisfaction, which was defined as the proportion of participants who continued using the pessary and reported a response of very much better or much better on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pelvic floor symptoms and adverse events. All analyses were based on a modified intention-to-treat approach, including participants who had at least one visit.

Results: Of 420 postmenopausal women randomised, 411 had at least one visit and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (208 in the vaginal oestrogen group and 203 in the placebo group). The mean age of participants was 66 years. Pessary continuation rate with satisfaction did not differ significantly between the oestrogen group and the placebo group (181/208 (87.0%) v 176/203 (86.7%); risk difference 0.3%, 95% confidence interval -6.2% to 6.9%; P=0.92). Excessive discharge (34/208 (16.3%) v 52/203 (25.6%); -9.3%, -17.1% to -1.4%), vaginal erosion or ulcer (4/208 (1.9%) v 14/203 (6.9%); -5.0%, -8.9% to -1.0%), and vaginal bleeding (3/208 (1.4%) v 13/203 (6.4%); -5.0%, -8.7% to -1.2%) were less common in the vaginal oestrogen group.

Conclusions: Oestrogen cream did not improve the continuation rate of ring pessary use with satisfaction. Use of oestrogen cream might be associated with a lower risk of common adverse events. The clinical decision to use vaginal oestrogen should take into account its benefits and risks and the patient's personal preferences.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04393194.

阴道内结合雌激素对盆腔器官脱垂持续治疗的影响:多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
目的:探讨阴道雌激素乳膏对盆腔器官脱垂患者子宫延续率的影响。设计:多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。地点:中国12个学术医疗中心(2020年5月- 2023年6月)。受试者:绝经后盆腔器官脱垂≥2期且成功安装环子宫托的妇女按1:1的比例随机分配接受雌激素乳膏或安慰剂乳膏。干预措施:子宫内膜安装成功后的前两周,每晚阴道插入1克共轭雌激素乳膏(0.625 mg/g)或安慰剂乳膏,随后12个月每周两次。主要结果测量:主要结果是满意的必要延续率,定义为继续使用子宫托的参与者的比例,并报告在12个月时患者总体印象改善问卷上的反应非常好或非常好。次要结局包括自我报告的盆底症状和不良事件。所有的分析都基于一种改良的意向治疗方法,包括至少有一次就诊的参与者。结果:420名绝经后妇女随机分组,411名至少有一次就诊,并被纳入改良意向治疗分析(阴道雌激素组208名,安慰剂组203名)。参与者的平均年龄为66岁。雌激素组和安慰剂组的子宫持续满意度无显著差异(181/208 (87.0%)vs 176/203 (86.7%);风险差0.3%,95%置信区间-6.2% ~ 6.9%;P = 0.92)。过度放电(34/208 (16.3%)v 52/203 (25.6%);-9.3%, -17.1%至-1.4%),阴道糜烂或溃疡(4/208 (1.9%)v 14/203 (6.9%);-5.0%, -8.9%, -1.0%),阴道出血(3/208 v (1.4%) 13/203 (6.4%);-5.0%, -8.7% ~ -1.2%)阴道雌激素组较少见。结论:雌激素乳膏并没有提高环子宫内膜持续使用的满意度。使用雌激素乳膏可能会降低常见不良事件的风险。使用阴道雌激素的临床决定应考虑其益处和风险以及患者的个人偏好。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04393194。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信