Placenta Accreta Spectrum Outcomes with a Multidisciplinary Team and Standardized Ultrasound Approach.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elise A Rosenthal, Ashlyn K Lafferty, Jessica E Pruszynski, Naseem Uddin, Catherine Y Spong, Christina L Herrera
{"title":"Placenta Accreta Spectrum Outcomes with a Multidisciplinary Team and Standardized Ultrasound Approach.","authors":"Elise A Rosenthal, Ashlyn K Lafferty, Jessica E Pruszynski, Naseem Uddin, Catherine Y Spong, Christina L Herrera","doi":"10.1055/a-2626-3120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare outcomes before and after starting a multidisciplinary PAS team with a standardized ultrasound approach.Retrospective cohort study of deliveries ≥ 24 weeks complicated by PAS from August 2009 to April 2022 at a large tertiary care hospital. The multidisciplinary team started in October 2020, and a standardized ultrasound approach was consistently practiced. We compared demographics and pregnancy characteristics before and after the formation of the PAS team. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> for categorical variables student's <i>t</i>-test and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables.Of 244 patients, 32 delivered with and 212 delivered before the PAS team. Median gestational age at delivery did not change (37 [36-38] vs. 37 [36-37] weeks before the team, <i>p</i> = 0.680). With the team, 31/32 cases of PAS were prenatally diagnosed (97%) compared with 177/212 (83%) before the team (<i>p</i> = 0.058). There were more cases of false positive prenatal suspicion present with the team (11% vs. 31%). Fewer hysterectomies occurred with the team at 21 (66%) versus 197 (93%) before the team, (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pathologic severity in hysterectomy specimens significantly differed (<i>p</i> = 0.032), with 10 cases with negative pathology before and none with the team. Due to the lower rate of hysterectomy, the overall median EBL was lower with the team (<i>p</i> = 0.018), but other outcomes were similar. This difference in EBL did not persist when limiting to hysterectomy cases. Maternal LOS overall (6 [5-9] vs. 8 [5-15] days, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and within hysterectomies (6 [5-8] vs. 9 [6-16] days, <i>p</i> = 0.042) was significantly shorter with the team.A multidisciplinary PAS team with a standardized ultrasound approach decreased unnecessary hysterectomies and reduced the length of stay at a large tertiary hospital. A higher rate of false positive prenatal suspicion was observed. This finding supports a need for improved prenatal diagnosis to enable better preoperative risk stratification and planning. · A multidisciplinary PAS team with standardized ultrasound reduces unnecessary hysterectomy.. · Heightened assessment increased identification prenatally resulting in more false positive cases.. · Our findings highlight the need for improved preoperative risk stratification and planning..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2626-3120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare outcomes before and after starting a multidisciplinary PAS team with a standardized ultrasound approach.Retrospective cohort study of deliveries ≥ 24 weeks complicated by PAS from August 2009 to April 2022 at a large tertiary care hospital. The multidisciplinary team started in October 2020, and a standardized ultrasound approach was consistently practiced. We compared demographics and pregnancy characteristics before and after the formation of the PAS team. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and χ 2 for categorical variables student's t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables.Of 244 patients, 32 delivered with and 212 delivered before the PAS team. Median gestational age at delivery did not change (37 [36-38] vs. 37 [36-37] weeks before the team, p = 0.680). With the team, 31/32 cases of PAS were prenatally diagnosed (97%) compared with 177/212 (83%) before the team (p = 0.058). There were more cases of false positive prenatal suspicion present with the team (11% vs. 31%). Fewer hysterectomies occurred with the team at 21 (66%) versus 197 (93%) before the team, (p < 0.001). Pathologic severity in hysterectomy specimens significantly differed (p = 0.032), with 10 cases with negative pathology before and none with the team. Due to the lower rate of hysterectomy, the overall median EBL was lower with the team (p = 0.018), but other outcomes were similar. This difference in EBL did not persist when limiting to hysterectomy cases. Maternal LOS overall (6 [5-9] vs. 8 [5-15] days, p = 0.031) and within hysterectomies (6 [5-8] vs. 9 [6-16] days, p = 0.042) was significantly shorter with the team.A multidisciplinary PAS team with a standardized ultrasound approach decreased unnecessary hysterectomies and reduced the length of stay at a large tertiary hospital. A higher rate of false positive prenatal suspicion was observed. This finding supports a need for improved prenatal diagnosis to enable better preoperative risk stratification and planning. · A multidisciplinary PAS team with standardized ultrasound reduces unnecessary hysterectomy.. · Heightened assessment increased identification prenatally resulting in more false positive cases.. · Our findings highlight the need for improved preoperative risk stratification and planning..

多学科团队和标准化超声方法的胎盘增生谱结果。
本研究旨在比较多学科PAS团队采用标准化超声方法前后的结果。2009年8月至2022年4月在一家大型三级医院对分娩≥24周合并PAS的回顾性队列研究。多学科团队于2020年10月开始,并一直采用标准化的超声方法。我们比较了PAS团队成立前后的人口统计学和妊娠特征。统计分析包括分类变量的Fisher精确检验和χ 2,连续变量的学生t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。在244名患者中,32名与PAS团队一起分娩,212名在PAS团队之前分娩。分娩时中位胎龄没有变化(37[36-38]周vs.小组前37[36-37]周,p = 0.680)。与小组前的177/212例(83%)相比,小组前的31/32例产前诊断出PAS (97%) (p = 0.058)。该团队存在更多假阳性产前怀疑病例(11%对31%)。该组子宫切除术发生率为21例(66%),而该组前为197例(93%),(p p = 0.032),其中10例术前病理阴性,该组无一例。由于子宫切除术率较低,整体中位EBL较低(p = 0.018),但其他结果相似。当局限于子宫切除术病例时,EBL的这种差异并不持续存在。产妇LOS总体(6[5-9]对8[5-15]天,p = 0.031)和子宫切除术内(6[5-8]对9[6-16]天,p = 0.042)明显缩短。多学科PAS团队采用标准化超声方法减少了不必要的子宫切除术,缩短了在大型三级医院的住院时间。假阳性产前怀疑率较高。这一发现支持需要改进产前诊断,使更好的术前风险分层和规划。·多学科PAS团队与标准化超声减少不必要的子宫切除术。·加强评估,增加产前识别,导致更多假阳性病例。·我们的研究结果强调了改进术前风险分层和规划的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信