Detecting rs-fMRI Networks in Disorders of Consciousness: Improving Clinical Interpretability

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jean Paul Medina Carrion, Mario Stanziano, Ludovico D'Incerti, Davide Sattin, Stefania Ferraro, Davide Rossi Sebastiano, Francesca Giulia Magnani, Alice Deruti, Davide Fedeli, Ludovico Minati, Francesca Epifani, Marina Grisoli, Matilde Leonardi, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Anna Nigri, Cristina Rosazza
{"title":"Detecting rs-fMRI Networks in Disorders of Consciousness: Improving Clinical Interpretability","authors":"Jean Paul Medina Carrion,&nbsp;Mario Stanziano,&nbsp;Ludovico D'Incerti,&nbsp;Davide Sattin,&nbsp;Stefania Ferraro,&nbsp;Davide Rossi Sebastiano,&nbsp;Francesca Giulia Magnani,&nbsp;Alice Deruti,&nbsp;Davide Fedeli,&nbsp;Ludovico Minati,&nbsp;Francesca Epifani,&nbsp;Marina Grisoli,&nbsp;Matilde Leonardi,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Bruzzone,&nbsp;Anna Nigri,&nbsp;Cristina Rosazza","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Preserved resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) networks are typically observed in Disorders of Consciousness (DOC). Despite the widespread use of rs-fMRI in DOC, a systematic assessment of networks is needed to improve the interpretability of data in clinical practice. We investigated functional connectivity of the main networks, combining structural MRI to obtain a description of the most observed networks in DOC, their diagnostic ability, and whether they can be related to clinical assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A group of 109 chronic patients [65 vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness state (VS/UWS), 34 minimally conscious state (MCS), and 10 emerged from MCS (eMCS)], with different etiologies, and 34 control subjects underwent multimodal assessment. Rs-fMRI data were analyzed with a semi-automatic pipeline to assess residual functional activity in terms of number, type, mean intensity, and structural preservation of networks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The more networks observed, the better the patient's clinical condition is likely to be. VS/UWS patients display 0–9, MCS 5–9, and eMCS 8–10 networks. Both the presence and intensity of 5 networks (visual networks, temporal, left fronto-parietal and default mode network) are relevant to distinguish VS/UWS from MCS, with AUCs of 0.64–0.69 (95% confidence interval). Etiology and disease duration have an impact on the number and type of preserved networks. High residual functional connectivity observed in VS/UWS patients, as in MCS, is in agreement with neurophysiological and metabolic evaluations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic assessment of the main rs-fMRI networks in DOC provides basic measures of functional connectivity that can enhance their interpretability in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 9","pages":"1771-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.70094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preserved resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) networks are typically observed in Disorders of Consciousness (DOC). Despite the widespread use of rs-fMRI in DOC, a systematic assessment of networks is needed to improve the interpretability of data in clinical practice. We investigated functional connectivity of the main networks, combining structural MRI to obtain a description of the most observed networks in DOC, their diagnostic ability, and whether they can be related to clinical assessment.

Methods

A group of 109 chronic patients [65 vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness state (VS/UWS), 34 minimally conscious state (MCS), and 10 emerged from MCS (eMCS)], with different etiologies, and 34 control subjects underwent multimodal assessment. Rs-fMRI data were analyzed with a semi-automatic pipeline to assess residual functional activity in terms of number, type, mean intensity, and structural preservation of networks.

Results

The more networks observed, the better the patient's clinical condition is likely to be. VS/UWS patients display 0–9, MCS 5–9, and eMCS 8–10 networks. Both the presence and intensity of 5 networks (visual networks, temporal, left fronto-parietal and default mode network) are relevant to distinguish VS/UWS from MCS, with AUCs of 0.64–0.69 (95% confidence interval). Etiology and disease duration have an impact on the number and type of preserved networks. High residual functional connectivity observed in VS/UWS patients, as in MCS, is in agreement with neurophysiological and metabolic evaluations.

Conclusions

This systematic assessment of the main rs-fMRI networks in DOC provides basic measures of functional connectivity that can enhance their interpretability in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

意识障碍的rs-fMRI网络检测:提高临床可解释性。
背景:保留的静息状态功能MRI (rs-fMRI)网络通常在意识障碍(DOC)中观察到。尽管rs-fMRI在DOC中广泛使用,但需要对网络进行系统评估,以提高临床实践中数据的可解释性。我们研究了主要网络的功能连通性,结合结构MRI获得了DOC中观察最多的网络的描述,它们的诊断能力,以及它们是否可以与临床评估相关。方法:109例不同病因的慢性患者[65例处于植物人/无反应清醒状态(VS/UWS), 34例处于最低意识状态(MCS), 10例处于最低意识状态(eMCS)]和34例对照者进行多模式评估。Rs-fMRI数据用半自动流水线进行分析,以评估网络的数量、类型、平均强度和结构保存方面的剩余功能活动。结果:网络观察越多,患者的临床状况可能越好。VS/UWS患者显示0-9,MCS 5-9, eMCS 8-10网络。5个网络(视觉网络、颞叶网络、左额顶叶网络和默认模式网络)的存在和强度与VS/UWS与MCS的区分相关,auc为0.64-0.69(95%置信区间)。病因和病程对保留网络的数量和类型有影响。与MCS一样,VS/UWS患者观察到的高残留功能连通性与神经生理学和代谢评估一致。结论:对DOC主要rs-fMRI网络的系统评估提供了功能连通性的基本措施,可以提高其在临床实践中的可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信