Satisfaction with Prosthesis and Walking Ability among Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users from Two Selected Rehabilitation Hospitals in Rwanda.

Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v8i1.6
Pasteur Butoya, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jackline Mupenzi Gatsinzi, Dumisani James Ngulube, Joanitah Kemigisha, Diane Izere, Innocent Mbonyinshuti, Nuhu Assuman
{"title":"Satisfaction with Prosthesis and Walking Ability among Trans-Tibial Prosthesis Users from Two Selected Rehabilitation Hospitals in Rwanda.","authors":"Pasteur Butoya, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jackline Mupenzi Gatsinzi, Dumisani James Ngulube, Joanitah Kemigisha, Diane Izere, Innocent Mbonyinshuti, Nuhu Assuman","doi":"10.4314/rjmhs.v8i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Satisfaction with the prosthesis is the key element to using the prosthesis for better walking and performing daily activities among transtibial prosthesis users. Different factors affect satisfaction and walking ability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate satisfaction and assess walking ability among transtibial prosthesis users from two rehabilitation hospitals in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 transtibial prosthesis users who received their prostheses from the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali and Gatagara Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Hospital, Nyanza. The research was done from February 1, 2024, to April 30, 2024. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience-Revised (TAPES-R) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction whereas the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the 2 minutes' walk test (2MWT) were used for walking ability assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 45 participants, 71.1% (n=32) were males and the remaining were females. On satisfaction with prosthesis, 62.2% were satisfied while 37.8% were unsatisfied. The satisfaction was statistically significantly associated with shape (p≤0.001), appearance (p≤0.003), weight (p≤0.001), usefulness (p≤0.027), reliability (p≤0.035), fit (p≤0.001), and comfort (p≤0.038) of their prosthesis, their health status (p≤0.011) and physical status (p≤0.001). For walking ability, 60% of the participants demonstrated moderate walking ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some transtibial prosthesis users were unsatisfied with their prosthesis. Moderate walking ability was observed generally. More rehabilitation including gait training, physiotherapy, early prosthetic fitting, rehabilitation team follow-ups and use of advanced prosthetic technology are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":520910,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"75-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v8i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Satisfaction with the prosthesis is the key element to using the prosthesis for better walking and performing daily activities among transtibial prosthesis users. Different factors affect satisfaction and walking ability.

Objective: To evaluate satisfaction and assess walking ability among transtibial prosthesis users from two rehabilitation hospitals in Rwanda.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 transtibial prosthesis users who received their prostheses from the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali and Gatagara Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Hospital, Nyanza. The research was done from February 1, 2024, to April 30, 2024. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience-Revised (TAPES-R) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction whereas the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the 2 minutes' walk test (2MWT) were used for walking ability assessment.

Results: Out of 45 participants, 71.1% (n=32) were males and the remaining were females. On satisfaction with prosthesis, 62.2% were satisfied while 37.8% were unsatisfied. The satisfaction was statistically significantly associated with shape (p≤0.001), appearance (p≤0.003), weight (p≤0.001), usefulness (p≤0.027), reliability (p≤0.035), fit (p≤0.001), and comfort (p≤0.038) of their prosthesis, their health status (p≤0.011) and physical status (p≤0.001). For walking ability, 60% of the participants demonstrated moderate walking ability.

Conclusion: Some transtibial prosthesis users were unsatisfied with their prosthesis. Moderate walking ability was observed generally. More rehabilitation including gait training, physiotherapy, early prosthetic fitting, rehabilitation team follow-ups and use of advanced prosthetic technology are recommended.

卢旺达两家选定康复医院胫骨义肢使用者对义肢和行走能力的满意度。
背景:对义肢的满意度是义肢使用者使用义肢进行更好的行走和日常活动的关键因素。不同因素影响满意度和步行能力。目的:评价卢旺达两家康复医院胫骨义肢使用者的满意度和行走能力。方法:对在基加利大学教学医院和尼扬扎Gatagara骨科康复医院接受义肢的45例经胫骨义肢使用者进行定量横断面研究。研究时间为2024年2月1日至2024年4月30日。采用三位一体截肢与义肢体验修正量表(tape - r)评估满意度,采用拔腿时间测试(TUG)和2分钟步行测试(2MWT)评估步行能力。结果:在45名参与者中,71.1% (n=32)为男性,其余为女性。在义肢满意度方面,满意62.2%,不满意37.8%。满意度与义肢的形状(p≤0.001)、外观(p≤0.003)、重量(p≤0.001)、实用性(p≤0.027)、可靠性(p≤0.035)、契合度(p≤0.001)、舒适度(p≤0.038)、健康状况(p≤0.011)、身体状况(p≤0.001)有统计学显著相关。在行走能力方面,60%的参与者表现出中等的行走能力。结论:部分经胫义肢使用者对其使用的义肢不满意。行走能力一般适中。建议进行更多的康复治疗,包括步态训练、物理治疗、早期假肢装配、康复团队随访和使用先进的假肢技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信