Shedding Sunshine on Gender Inequities in Industry Compensation to Physicians: a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment Analysis.

Adam M Almaguer, Kyle D Paul, Alexandra M Arguello, Aseel G Dib, Erin Katz, Achraf H Jardaly, Andrew T Ko, Monica Kogan, Gerald McGwin, Bradley W Wills, Brent A Ponce
{"title":"Shedding Sunshine on Gender Inequities in Industry Compensation to Physicians: a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment Analysis.","authors":"Adam M Almaguer, Kyle D Paul, Alexandra M Arguello, Aseel G Dib, Erin Katz, Achraf H Jardaly, Andrew T Ko, Monica Kogan, Gerald McGwin, Bradley W Wills, Brent A Ponce","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to compare payments reported in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database according to gender. The authors hypothesized that women physicians would have fewer payments and lower total compensation from pharmaceutical and medical device companies as compared with men. A higher proportion of males received > $1,000,000 in compensation from industry, and a higher proportion of females received < $1,000 in compensation from industry. The largest discrepancy in compensation between genders was seen in royalties/licensing, faculty/speaking, and consulting. Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment Database found that gender inequality exists in compensation from pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Female physicians receive less total compensation from industry. It is important to highlight this disparity between genders so that changes can be made to ensure that equal opportunities exist. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(2):102-107, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"34 2","pages":"102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare payments reported in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database according to gender. The authors hypothesized that women physicians would have fewer payments and lower total compensation from pharmaceutical and medical device companies as compared with men. A higher proportion of males received > $1,000,000 in compensation from industry, and a higher proportion of females received < $1,000 in compensation from industry. The largest discrepancy in compensation between genders was seen in royalties/licensing, faculty/speaking, and consulting. Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment Database found that gender inequality exists in compensation from pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Female physicians receive less total compensation from industry. It is important to highlight this disparity between genders so that changes can be made to ensure that equal opportunities exist. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(2):102-107, 2025).

为医生行业薪酬中的性别不平等洒下阳光:医疗保险和医疗补助服务开放支付分析中心。
本研究的目的是根据性别比较医疗保险和医疗补助服务开放支付数据库中报告的支付情况。作者假设,与男性相比,女性医生从制药和医疗器械公司获得的报酬更少,总报酬也更低。男性从企业获得100万美元薪酬的比例较高,女性从企业获得1000美元薪酬的比例较高。男女薪酬差异最大的是版税/许可、教师/演讲和咨询。对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心开放支付数据库的审查发现,制药和医疗器械公司的薪酬存在性别不平等。女医生从行业获得的总报酬较少。必须强调性别之间的这种差异,以便作出改变,确保存在平等机会。[j] .外科骨科进展34(2):102-107,2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信