Cost-Effectiveness of Family Conferences to Reduce Polypharmacy in Frail Older Adults.

IF 4.5
Joseph Montalbo, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios, Jens Abraham, Eva Drewelow, Manuela Ritzke, Achim Mortsiefer, Birgitt Wiese, Petra Thürmann, Stefan Wilm, Andrea Icks
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Family Conferences to Reduce Polypharmacy in Frail Older Adults.","authors":"Joseph Montalbo, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios, Jens Abraham, Eva Drewelow, Manuela Ritzke, Achim Mortsiefer, Birgitt Wiese, Petra Thürmann, Stefan Wilm, Andrea Icks","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cost-effectiveness of family conferences on deprescribing with joint prioritization of treatment goals in primary care has not been investigated so far. We assessed cost-effectiveness in the cluster-randomized controlled COFRAIL trial conducted with general practitioners and 521 older frail patients with polypharmacy cared for at home in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital admissions averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were associated with costs from the German Social Insurance perspective. We applied adjusted GLM regressions with specified distributions to estimate group differences on imputed data, plotted bootstrap cost-outcome pairs by simulated resampling of the study population to illustrate uncertainty and calculate the probability of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold, and assessed robustness in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention-related costs were €391 (US$459) per capita. On 100 people, the COFRAIL intervention had about 7 more hospital admissions (95% CI: -12; 26), 2 QALYs gained (95% CI: -1; 6), and additional costs of €117,681 (95% CI: -28,838; 264,201)/US$138,027 (95% CI: -33,824; 309,880) or €124,866 (95% CI: -12,649; 262,380)/US$146,455 (95% CI: -14,836; 307,745) without or with hospital costs, respectively, compared to usual care. By bootstrapping, we observed the COFRAIL intervention to have higher costs and more hospital admissions with a relative frequency of 28%-78%, or in terms of QALYs 57%-91%. The COFRAIL intervention had additional costs of €50,966 (US$59.778) per QALY gained with a 46% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay of €45,000/QALY (≈US$50,000/QALY).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COFRAIL intervention affected QALYs rather than hospital admissions after 12 months. The intervention tended to be associated with higher costs and QALYs but was less likely to be cost-effective than usual care at commonly used willingness-to-pay thresholds. Long-term cost-effectiveness should be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cost-effectiveness of family conferences on deprescribing with joint prioritization of treatment goals in primary care has not been investigated so far. We assessed cost-effectiveness in the cluster-randomized controlled COFRAIL trial conducted with general practitioners and 521 older frail patients with polypharmacy cared for at home in Germany.

Methods: Hospital admissions averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were associated with costs from the German Social Insurance perspective. We applied adjusted GLM regressions with specified distributions to estimate group differences on imputed data, plotted bootstrap cost-outcome pairs by simulated resampling of the study population to illustrate uncertainty and calculate the probability of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold, and assessed robustness in sensitivity analyses.

Results: Intervention-related costs were €391 (US$459) per capita. On 100 people, the COFRAIL intervention had about 7 more hospital admissions (95% CI: -12; 26), 2 QALYs gained (95% CI: -1; 6), and additional costs of €117,681 (95% CI: -28,838; 264,201)/US$138,027 (95% CI: -33,824; 309,880) or €124,866 (95% CI: -12,649; 262,380)/US$146,455 (95% CI: -14,836; 307,745) without or with hospital costs, respectively, compared to usual care. By bootstrapping, we observed the COFRAIL intervention to have higher costs and more hospital admissions with a relative frequency of 28%-78%, or in terms of QALYs 57%-91%. The COFRAIL intervention had additional costs of €50,966 (US$59.778) per QALY gained with a 46% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay of €45,000/QALY (≈US$50,000/QALY).

Conclusion: The COFRAIL intervention affected QALYs rather than hospital admissions after 12 months. The intervention tended to be associated with higher costs and QALYs but was less likely to be cost-effective than usual care at commonly used willingness-to-pay thresholds. Long-term cost-effectiveness should be assessed.

家庭会议减少体弱老年人多重用药的成本效益。
背景:到目前为止,尚未调查家庭会议在初级保健中联合优先治疗目标开处方的成本效益。我们对德国全科医生和521名在家中接受多种药物治疗的老年体弱患者进行的集群随机对照co虚弱试验进行了成本-效果评估。方法:从德国社会保险的角度来看,避免住院和获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)与成本相关。我们应用具有指定分布的调整GLM回归来估计输入数据的组差异,通过模拟研究人群的重新采样绘制bootstrap成本-结果对,以说明不确定性并计算给定支付意愿阈值的成本-效果概率,并评估敏感性分析的稳健性。结果:干预相关费用为人均391欧元(459美元)。在100人中,co虚弱干预的住院人数增加了约7人(95% CI: -12;26),获得2个质量aly (95% CI: -1;6),以及额外费用117,681欧元(95% CI: -28,838;264,201)/ 138,027美元(95% ci: -33,824;309,880)或124,866欧元(95% CI: -12,649;262,380)/ 146,455美元(95% ci: -14,836;307,745),与常规护理相比,分别是免费或有住院费用。通过自举,我们观察到co虚弱干预具有更高的成本和更多的住院率,相对频率为28%-78%,或就QALYs而言为57%-91%。co虚弱干预措施每获得一个QALY的额外成本为50,966欧元(59.778美元),而在愿意支付45,000欧元/QALY(≈50,000美元/QALY)的情况下,成本效益概率为46%。结论:co虚弱干预影响12个月后的QALYs而不是住院率。干预往往与较高的成本和质量年有关,但在常用的支付意愿阈值下,与常规护理相比,不太可能具有成本效益。应评估长期成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信