A Multimodal Fall Prevention Intervention in the Setting of the Emergency Department.

IF 4.5
Joshua D Niznik, Cassandra Small, Casey J Kelley, Jessica McMullen, Greta Anton, Ellen Roberts, Sophia Lourduraj, Martin F Casey, Jan Busby-Whitehead, Katie Davenport
{"title":"A Multimodal Fall Prevention Intervention in the Setting of the Emergency Department.","authors":"Joshua D Niznik, Cassandra Small, Casey J Kelley, Jessica McMullen, Greta Anton, Ellen Roberts, Sophia Lourduraj, Martin F Casey, Jan Busby-Whitehead, Katie Davenport","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergency department (ED) is an opportune setting for fall prevention interventions. We implemented and evaluated a multimodal falls prevention intervention addressing medications, mobility, and functional risk factors among older adults presenting to the ED for fall-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a quality improvement intervention at two hospitals among ED visits for adults aged 65 and older with a chief complaint of fall between May 2023 and June 2024. The intervention included: (1) medication review by a pharmacist; (2) assessment by physical therapy (PT); and (3) assessment by occupational therapy (OT). We conducted a retrospective evaluation of electronic health records and reported the proportion of patients that received screening along with risk factors, recommendations, adherence to recommendations, and return visits at 3 and 6 months. We used logistic regression to examine factors associated with return visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 686 older adults who received ≥ 1 screening. Most patients received PT and OT evaluations (94.8% and 93.4%), while fewer (15.2%) received medication reviews. The most common problems identified by PT and OT were fall risk, decreased mobility, and impaired balance. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility was the most common recommendation (55.5% PT, 55.1% OT) followed by home care (33.1% PT, 31.2% OT). High-risk medications most often identified were anticoagulants, antidepressants, and gabapentin. The most common recommendation was to \"discuss with a primary care physician.\" Among those who received ≥ 1 intervention, 8.9% experienced a return visit within 3 months and 12.8% within 6 months. Inpatient admission was associated with increased likelihood of return visits compared to discharge from the ED.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most prevalent risk factors for falls among older adults presenting to the ED are likely modifiable through PT and OT intervention. Further research is needed to address uptake barriers and longitudinal impact on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emergency department (ED) is an opportune setting for fall prevention interventions. We implemented and evaluated a multimodal falls prevention intervention addressing medications, mobility, and functional risk factors among older adults presenting to the ED for fall-related injuries.

Methods: We implemented a quality improvement intervention at two hospitals among ED visits for adults aged 65 and older with a chief complaint of fall between May 2023 and June 2024. The intervention included: (1) medication review by a pharmacist; (2) assessment by physical therapy (PT); and (3) assessment by occupational therapy (OT). We conducted a retrospective evaluation of electronic health records and reported the proportion of patients that received screening along with risk factors, recommendations, adherence to recommendations, and return visits at 3 and 6 months. We used logistic regression to examine factors associated with return visits.

Results: We identified 686 older adults who received ≥ 1 screening. Most patients received PT and OT evaluations (94.8% and 93.4%), while fewer (15.2%) received medication reviews. The most common problems identified by PT and OT were fall risk, decreased mobility, and impaired balance. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility was the most common recommendation (55.5% PT, 55.1% OT) followed by home care (33.1% PT, 31.2% OT). High-risk medications most often identified were anticoagulants, antidepressants, and gabapentin. The most common recommendation was to "discuss with a primary care physician." Among those who received ≥ 1 intervention, 8.9% experienced a return visit within 3 months and 12.8% within 6 months. Inpatient admission was associated with increased likelihood of return visits compared to discharge from the ED.

Conclusion: The most prevalent risk factors for falls among older adults presenting to the ED are likely modifiable through PT and OT intervention. Further research is needed to address uptake barriers and longitudinal impact on outcomes.

在急诊科设置的多模式预防跌倒干预。
背景:急诊科(ED)是预防跌倒干预的适宜场所。我们实施并评估了一种多模式的跌倒预防干预措施,解决了因跌倒相关损伤到急诊科就诊的老年人的药物、活动能力和功能风险因素。方法:我们在两家医院对2023年5月至2024年6月期间以跌倒为主诉的65岁及以上成人急诊科就诊实施了质量改善干预。干预措施包括:(1)由药剂师进行药物审查;(2)物理治疗评估;(3)职业治疗评估。我们对电子健康记录进行了回顾性评估,并报告了接受筛查的患者比例、风险因素、建议、对建议的依从性以及3个月和6个月时的复诊。我们使用逻辑回归来检验与回访相关的因素。结果:我们确定了686名接受≥1次筛查的老年人。大多数患者接受了PT和OT评估(94.8%和93.4%),而接受药物评价的患者较少(15.2%)。PT和OT最常见的问题是跌倒风险、活动能力下降和平衡受损。出院到专业护理机构是最常见的建议(55.5% PT, 55.1% OT),其次是家庭护理(33.1% PT, 31.2% OT)。最常见的高危药物是抗凝血剂、抗抑郁药和加巴喷丁。最常见的建议是“与初级保健医生讨论”。在接受≥1次干预的患者中,8.9%的患者在3个月内回访,12.8%的患者在6个月内回访。与从急诊科出院相比,住院患者复诊的可能性增加。结论:在急诊科就诊的老年人中,最常见的跌倒危险因素可能通过PT和OT干预来改变。需要进一步的研究来解决吸收障碍和对结果的纵向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信