Trends in utilization of remote monitoring in the United States.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf115
Joseph H Joo, Nadia Lieu, Yixin Tang, Danielle S Browne, Bethany Agusala, Joshua M Liao
{"title":"Trends in utilization of remote monitoring in the United States.","authors":"Joseph H Joo, Nadia Lieu, Yixin Tang, Danielle S Browne, Bethany Agusala, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote monitoring can help clinicians provide timely services and enable patients to engage in managing their medical conditions. Unfortunately, little is known about the national utilization of remote monitoring across the United States. Using 2019-2023 Medicare data encompassing 100% of professional services billed to and reimbursed by Medicare, we conducted a national analysis of remote-monitoring utilization. A total of 13 529 594 remote-monitoring services (remote patient monitoring and remote therapeutic monitoring), corresponding to $664 518 754, occurred between 2019 and 2023. Remote patient monitoring was most frequently delivered by primary care clinicians, accounting for 6 377 468 (48%) of all services, whereas remote therapeutic monitoring was most frequently delivered by other specialists, accounting for 173 621 (51%) services. With respect to place of service, most remote patient monitoring occurred in physician offices (12 135 569; 92%) compared with at home (540 219; 4%), or other care sites (515 302; 4%). Most remote therapeutic monitoring occurred in physician offices (322 156; 95%) compared with at home (12 560; 4%), or other care sites (3788; 1%). Our study results highlight the salient use of remote monitoring across clinical specialties and the need to address adoption barriers in certain care sites to further enhance utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 6","pages":"qxaf115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote monitoring can help clinicians provide timely services and enable patients to engage in managing their medical conditions. Unfortunately, little is known about the national utilization of remote monitoring across the United States. Using 2019-2023 Medicare data encompassing 100% of professional services billed to and reimbursed by Medicare, we conducted a national analysis of remote-monitoring utilization. A total of 13 529 594 remote-monitoring services (remote patient monitoring and remote therapeutic monitoring), corresponding to $664 518 754, occurred between 2019 and 2023. Remote patient monitoring was most frequently delivered by primary care clinicians, accounting for 6 377 468 (48%) of all services, whereas remote therapeutic monitoring was most frequently delivered by other specialists, accounting for 173 621 (51%) services. With respect to place of service, most remote patient monitoring occurred in physician offices (12 135 569; 92%) compared with at home (540 219; 4%), or other care sites (515 302; 4%). Most remote therapeutic monitoring occurred in physician offices (322 156; 95%) compared with at home (12 560; 4%), or other care sites (3788; 1%). Our study results highlight the salient use of remote monitoring across clinical specialties and the need to address adoption barriers in certain care sites to further enhance utilization.

美国使用远程监控的趋势。
远程监测可以帮助临床医生提供及时的服务,并使患者能够参与管理他们的医疗状况。不幸的是,人们对美国全国范围内远程监控的使用情况知之甚少。利用2019-2023年医疗保险数据,包括100%由医疗保险收费和报销的专业服务,我们对远程监控的使用情况进行了全国分析。2019年至2023年期间,总共发生了13 529 594次远程监测服务(远程患者监测和远程治疗监测),相当于664 518 754美元。远程患者监测最常由初级保健医生提供,占所有服务的6 377 468例(48%),而远程治疗监测最常由其他专家提供,占173 621例(51%)。就服务地点而言,大多数远程患者监测发生在医生办公室(12 135 569;92%),而在家(540 219;4%),或其他护理场所(515302;4%)。大多数远程治疗监测发生在医生办公室(322 156;95%)与在家(12560;4%),或其他护理场所(3788;1%)。我们的研究结果强调了远程监控在临床专业中的突出应用,需要解决某些护理场所的采用障碍,以进一步提高利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信