Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study.

Nassr Nama, Kara Picco, Polina Kyrychenko, Jeffrey N Bone, Julie Quet, Jessica L Foulds, Josée Anne Gagnon, Chris Novak, Brigitte Parisien, Matthew Donlan, Ran D Goldman, Anupam Sehgal, Ronik Kanani, Joanna Holland, Sanjay Mahant, Eric Coon, Joel S Tieder, Peter J Gill
{"title":"Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Nassr Nama, Kara Picco, Polina Kyrychenko, Jeffrey N Bone, Julie Quet, Jessica L Foulds, Josée Anne Gagnon, Chris Novak, Brigitte Parisien, Matthew Donlan, Ran D Goldman, Anupam Sehgal, Ronik Kanani, Joanna Holland, Sanjay Mahant, Eric Coon, Joel S Tieder, Peter J Gill","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines on Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) only provide recommendations for infants categorized at lower risk. However, most infants fall into the higher-risk category, leaving management decisions to individual clinicians and contributing to variation in care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe interhospital variation in BRUE management and determine whether higher resource utilization improves detection of serious underlying diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter observational cohort (2017-2021) included infants (< 12 months) with BRUE at eight Canadian hospitals. We recorded admission, and use of electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), antibiotic and anti-reflux medications, and subspecialty consultations. Multivariable median regression evaluated the association between tests/interventions and length of stay (LOS), and logistic regression assessed whether site-level resource use correlated with serious underlying diagnoses detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 758 infants (92% higher-risk), we noted variation in admission rates (32%-76%, p < .001), ICU admissions (0%-20%, p < .001), median LOS (0.8-2.0 days, p < .001), ECG (24%-78%, p < .001), EEG (8%-29%, p = .001), and anti-reflux medication (0%-21%, p < .001). Five percent had a serious underlying diagnosis, with no significant site differences (0%-8%, p = .49). Median regression showed EEG (19.9 h, 95% CI: 6.8-33.0, p = .03), empiric antibiotics (15.8 h, 95% CI: 4.7-26.9, p = .03), and subspecialty consultation (17.0 h, 95% CI: 10.8-23.2, p < .001) were associated with longer LOS. Higher resource use did not increase detection of serious underlying diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substantial variation exists in BRUE management, associated with prolonged LOS. Higher admission and testing were not associated with increased detection of serious underlying diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for standardized care approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guidelines on Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) only provide recommendations for infants categorized at lower risk. However, most infants fall into the higher-risk category, leaving management decisions to individual clinicians and contributing to variation in care.

Objectives: Describe interhospital variation in BRUE management and determine whether higher resource utilization improves detection of serious underlying diagnoses.

Methods: This multicenter observational cohort (2017-2021) included infants (< 12 months) with BRUE at eight Canadian hospitals. We recorded admission, and use of electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), antibiotic and anti-reflux medications, and subspecialty consultations. Multivariable median regression evaluated the association between tests/interventions and length of stay (LOS), and logistic regression assessed whether site-level resource use correlated with serious underlying diagnoses detection.

Results: Of 758 infants (92% higher-risk), we noted variation in admission rates (32%-76%, p < .001), ICU admissions (0%-20%, p < .001), median LOS (0.8-2.0 days, p < .001), ECG (24%-78%, p < .001), EEG (8%-29%, p = .001), and anti-reflux medication (0%-21%, p < .001). Five percent had a serious underlying diagnosis, with no significant site differences (0%-8%, p = .49). Median regression showed EEG (19.9 h, 95% CI: 6.8-33.0, p = .03), empiric antibiotics (15.8 h, 95% CI: 4.7-26.9, p = .03), and subspecialty consultation (17.0 h, 95% CI: 10.8-23.2, p < .001) were associated with longer LOS. Higher resource use did not increase detection of serious underlying diagnoses.

Conclusions: Substantial variation exists in BRUE management, associated with prolonged LOS. Higher admission and testing were not associated with increased detection of serious underlying diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for standardized care approaches.

一项加拿大多中心队列研究:医院间对婴儿短暂解决的不明原因事件(BRUE)处理的差异
背景:简要解决不明原因事件指南(BRUE)仅为风险较低的婴儿提供建议。然而,大多数婴儿属于高风险类别,将管理决策留给个别临床医生,并导致护理的变化。目的:描述BRUE管理的医院间差异,并确定更高的资源利用率是否能提高严重潜在诊断的检测。方法:该多中心观察队列(2017-2021)包括婴儿(结果:758名婴儿(高风险92%),我们注意到入院率的变化(32%-76%,p)。结论:BRUE管理存在实质性变化,与延长的LOS有关。较高的入院率和检测率与严重潜在诊断的检出率增加无关。这些发现强调了标准化护理方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信