One Health Index Calculator for India Using Empirical Methods for Policy Stewardship: Development and Usability Study.

Saveetha Meganathan, Arpit Katiyar, Esha Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar Mishra
{"title":"One Health Index Calculator for India Using Empirical Methods for Policy Stewardship: Development and Usability Study.","authors":"Saveetha Meganathan, Arpit Katiyar, Esha Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar Mishra","doi":"10.2196/65039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One Health is a collaborative approach that can be used to evaluate and enhance the fields of human, animal, and environmental health and to emphasize their sectoral interconnectedness. Empirical evaluation of the One Health performance of a country in the form of an index, provides direction for actionable interventions such as targeted funding, prioritized resource allocation, rigorous data management, and evidence-based policy decisions. These efforts, along with public engagement and awareness on disease management; environmental degradation, and preparedness toward disease outbreaks, contribute to strengthening global health security. Thus, developing a One Health Index (OHI) calculator for India is a significant step toward evidence-based One Health governance in the context of low-and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) develop a OHI Calculator for India using efficient and user-friendly weighting methods and demonstrate the calculation of the OHI; (2) develop India-specific datasets through secondary data collection from reliable data sources; and (3) determine data gaps for policy stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We proposed a OHI calculator to measure the OHI from an Indian context by adopting the Global One Health Index framework that comprises 3 categories: 13 key indicators, 57 indicators, and 216 subindicators. Secondary data collection was conducted to create a dataset for specific to India from reliable sources. For measuring OHI, we demonstrated two mathematical weighting methods: an efficient expert-based rating using fuzzy extent analysis and a modified entropy-based weightage method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate the step-by-step OHI calculation by determining indicator scores using both fuzzy extent analysis and modified entropy-based weightage method. Through secondary data collection an India-specific dataset was created using reliable sources. For the datasets from India, data for 156/216 subindicators were available, while that for the remaining 60 indicators were unavailable. Further, a pilot correlation analysis was performed between 20 indicator scores and relevant budget allocations for the years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025. It was found that increases in the budget allocation across consecutive years improved indicator scores or better performance and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The demonstrated OHI calculator has the potential to serve as a governance tool while promoting data transparency and ethical data management. There is a need for a collaborative data federation approach to resolve data gaps, including incomplete, missing, or unavailable data. Further, the correlation analysis between budgetary allocation and performance of indicators provides empirical evidence for policymakers to improve intersectoral communication, multistakeholder engagement, concerted interventions, and informed policy decisions for resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e65039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One Health is a collaborative approach that can be used to evaluate and enhance the fields of human, animal, and environmental health and to emphasize their sectoral interconnectedness. Empirical evaluation of the One Health performance of a country in the form of an index, provides direction for actionable interventions such as targeted funding, prioritized resource allocation, rigorous data management, and evidence-based policy decisions. These efforts, along with public engagement and awareness on disease management; environmental degradation, and preparedness toward disease outbreaks, contribute to strengthening global health security. Thus, developing a One Health Index (OHI) calculator for India is a significant step toward evidence-based One Health governance in the context of low-and middle-income countries.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) develop a OHI Calculator for India using efficient and user-friendly weighting methods and demonstrate the calculation of the OHI; (2) develop India-specific datasets through secondary data collection from reliable data sources; and (3) determine data gaps for policy stewardship.

Methods: We proposed a OHI calculator to measure the OHI from an Indian context by adopting the Global One Health Index framework that comprises 3 categories: 13 key indicators, 57 indicators, and 216 subindicators. Secondary data collection was conducted to create a dataset for specific to India from reliable sources. For measuring OHI, we demonstrated two mathematical weighting methods: an efficient expert-based rating using fuzzy extent analysis and a modified entropy-based weightage method.

Results: We demonstrate the step-by-step OHI calculation by determining indicator scores using both fuzzy extent analysis and modified entropy-based weightage method. Through secondary data collection an India-specific dataset was created using reliable sources. For the datasets from India, data for 156/216 subindicators were available, while that for the remaining 60 indicators were unavailable. Further, a pilot correlation analysis was performed between 20 indicator scores and relevant budget allocations for the years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025. It was found that increases in the budget allocation across consecutive years improved indicator scores or better performance and vice versa.

Conclusions: The demonstrated OHI calculator has the potential to serve as a governance tool while promoting data transparency and ethical data management. There is a need for a collaborative data federation approach to resolve data gaps, including incomplete, missing, or unavailable data. Further, the correlation analysis between budgetary allocation and performance of indicators provides empirical evidence for policymakers to improve intersectoral communication, multistakeholder engagement, concerted interventions, and informed policy decisions for resource allocation.

使用政策管理经验方法的印度健康指数计算器:开发和可用性研究。
背景:“同一个健康”是一种协作方法,可用于评价和加强人类、动物和环境卫生领域,并强调其部门间的相互联系。以指数形式对一个国家的“一个健康”绩效进行实证评价,为有针对性的供资、优先分配资源、严格的数据管理和基于证据的政策决策等可采取行动的干预措施提供指导。这些努力以及公众对疾病管理的参与和认识;环境退化和对疾病暴发的防范有助于加强全球卫生安全。因此,在低收入和中等收入国家的背景下,为印度制定一个单一健康指数(OHI)计算器是朝着以证据为基础的单一健康治理迈出的重要一步。目的:本研究旨在(1)使用高效和用户友好的加权方法为印度开发一个OHI计算器,并演示OHI的计算;(2)通过从可靠数据源收集二手数据,开发印度特有的数据集;(3)确定政策管理的数据缺口。方法:我们提出了一个OHI计算器,通过采用全球单一健康指数框架来衡量印度的OHI,该框架包括3类:13个关键指标,57个指标和216个子指标。进行了二次数据收集,以从可靠来源创建专门针对印度的数据集。为了测量OHI,我们展示了两种数学加权方法:一种基于专家的有效评级,使用模糊程度分析和一种改进的基于熵的加权方法。结果:通过模糊程度分析和改进的基于熵的权重法确定指标得分,我们演示了一步一步的OHI计算。通过二手数据收集,使用可靠的来源创建了印度特定的数据集。对于印度的数据集,156/216个子指标的数据是可用的,而其余60个指标的数据是不可用的。此外,对2022-2023年、2023-2024年和2024-2025年的20个指标得分与相关预算分配进行了试点相关性分析。研究发现,连续几年预算拨款的增加提高了指标得分或提高了绩效,反之亦然。结论:演示的OHI计算器具有作为治理工具的潜力,同时促进数据透明度和道德数据管理。需要一种协作数据联合方法来解决数据差距,包括不完整、缺失或不可用的数据。此外,预算分配与指标绩效之间的相关性分析为政策制定者改善部门间沟通、多方利益相关者参与、协调一致的干预措施和知情的资源分配政策决策提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信