Modularity of Online Social Networks and COVID-19 Misinformation Spreading in Russia: Combining Social Network Analysis and National Representative Survey.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI:10.2196/58302
Boris Pavlenko
{"title":"Modularity of Online Social Networks and COVID-19 Misinformation Spreading in Russia: Combining Social Network Analysis and National Representative Survey.","authors":"Boris Pavlenko","doi":"10.2196/58302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 was accompanied by a rise in the popularity of conspiracy theories. These theories often undermined vaccination efforts. There is evidence that the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 is associated with online social media use. Online social media enables network effects that influence the dissemination of information. It is important to distinguish between the effects of using social media and the network effects that occur within the platform.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association between the modularity of online social networks and the spread of, as well as attitudes toward, information and misinformation about COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the social network structure of the online social media platform Vkontakte (VK) to construct an adjusted modularity index (fragmentation index) for 166 Russian towns. VK is a widely used Russian social media platform. The study combined town-level network indices with data from the poll \"Research on COVID-19 in Russia's Regions\" (RoCIRR), which included responses from 23,000 individuals. The study measured respondents' knowledge of both fake and true statements about COVID-19, as well as their attitudes toward these statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A positive association was observed between town-level fragmentation and individuals' knowledge of fake statements, and a negative association with knowledge of true statements. There is a strong negative association between fragmentation and the average attitude toward true statements (P<.001), while the association with attitudes toward fake statements is positive but statistically insignificant (P=.55). Additionally, a strong association was found between network fragmentation and ideological differences in attitudes toward true versus fake statements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While social media use plays an important role in the diffusion of health-related information, the structure of social networks can amplify these effects. Social network modularity plays a key role in the spread of information, with differing impacts on true and fake statements. These differences in information dissemination contribute to variations in attitudes toward true and fake statements about COVID-19. Ultimately, fragmentation was associated with individual-level polarization on medical topics. Future research should further explore the interaction between social media use and underlying network effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"e58302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 was accompanied by a rise in the popularity of conspiracy theories. These theories often undermined vaccination efforts. There is evidence that the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 is associated with online social media use. Online social media enables network effects that influence the dissemination of information. It is important to distinguish between the effects of using social media and the network effects that occur within the platform.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between the modularity of online social networks and the spread of, as well as attitudes toward, information and misinformation about COVID-19.

Methods: This study used data from the social network structure of the online social media platform Vkontakte (VK) to construct an adjusted modularity index (fragmentation index) for 166 Russian towns. VK is a widely used Russian social media platform. The study combined town-level network indices with data from the poll "Research on COVID-19 in Russia's Regions" (RoCIRR), which included responses from 23,000 individuals. The study measured respondents' knowledge of both fake and true statements about COVID-19, as well as their attitudes toward these statements.

Results: A positive association was observed between town-level fragmentation and individuals' knowledge of fake statements, and a negative association with knowledge of true statements. There is a strong negative association between fragmentation and the average attitude toward true statements (P<.001), while the association with attitudes toward fake statements is positive but statistically insignificant (P=.55). Additionally, a strong association was found between network fragmentation and ideological differences in attitudes toward true versus fake statements.

Conclusions: While social media use plays an important role in the diffusion of health-related information, the structure of social networks can amplify these effects. Social network modularity plays a key role in the spread of information, with differing impacts on true and fake statements. These differences in information dissemination contribute to variations in attitudes toward true and fake statements about COVID-19. Ultimately, fragmentation was associated with individual-level polarization on medical topics. Future research should further explore the interaction between social media use and underlying network effects.

在线社交网络的模块化与俄罗斯COVID-19错误信息的传播:结合社会网络分析和全国代表性调查。
背景:2019年SARS-CoV-2的爆发伴随着阴谋论的流行。这些理论经常破坏疫苗接种工作。有证据表明,有关COVID-19的错误信息的传播与在线社交媒体的使用有关。在线社交媒体实现了影响信息传播的网络效应。区分使用社交媒体的效果和平台内发生的网络效应是很重要的。目的:本研究旨在探讨网络社交网络的模块化与COVID-19信息和错误信息的传播以及态度之间的关系。方法:利用在线社交媒体平台Vkontakte (VK)的社会网络结构数据,构建俄罗斯166个城镇的调整后模块化指数(碎片化指数)。VK是一个被广泛使用的俄罗斯社交媒体平台。该研究将乡镇一级网络指数与“俄罗斯地区COVID-19研究”民意调查(RoCIRR)的数据结合起来,其中包括23,000人的回复。该研究测量了受访者对有关COVID-19的虚假和真实陈述的了解程度,以及他们对这些陈述的态度。结果:城镇层面碎片化与个体虚假陈述知识呈正相关,与真实陈述知识呈负相关。碎片化与对真实陈述的平均态度之间存在强烈的负相关(p结论:虽然社交媒体的使用在健康相关信息的传播中起着重要作用,但社交网络的结构可以放大这些影响。社交网络的模块化在信息传播中起着关键作用,对真实和虚假陈述的影响不同。这些信息传播的差异导致人们对有关COVID-19的真假言论的态度存在差异。最终,碎片化与个人在医学话题上的两极分化有关。未来的研究应进一步探索社交媒体使用与潜在网络效应之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信