Two-year follow-up study (PRIMROSE 3) to assess bone mineral density in subjects with uterine fibroids completing the PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 linzagolix trials.

IF 8.3 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoaf025
Jacques Donnez, Felice Petraglia, Hugh Taylor, Christian Becker, Sven Becker, Francisco Carmona Herrera, Maciej Paszkowski, Elke Bestel, Satoshi Hori, Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
{"title":"Two-year follow-up study (PRIMROSE 3) to assess bone mineral density in subjects with uterine fibroids completing the PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 linzagolix trials.","authors":"Jacques Donnez, Felice Petraglia, Hugh Taylor, Christian Becker, Sven Becker, Francisco Carmona Herrera, Maciej Paszkowski, Elke Bestel, Satoshi Hori, Marie-Madeleine Dolmans","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoaf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>How important was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) from post-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment in PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 study participants?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>In the present study (PRIMROSE 3), mean percentage changes in lumbar spine BMD from the post-treatment baseline to month 24 (primary endpoint) were small in most treatment groups and similar to variations in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Due to its mechanism of action, some BMD decreases are observed with oral GnRH antagonist treatment, depending on the dose administered and addition or not of add-back therapy (ABT) (1 mg oestradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate). In PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2, no significant changes in BMD were observed in any of the three anatomic sites investigated (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip) in any of the treated groups but one. Indeed, at 24 weeks, mean differences were most pronounced in the lumbar spine in participants given 200 mg linzagolix alone.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>PRIMROSE 3 is a long-term follow-up study on BMD in subjects who completed at least 20 weeks of treatment in the main linzagolix trials (PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2) and underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) within 35 days of their last treatment (week 24 or week 52 [extension study]). The primary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip BMD from post-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment in PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 study participants. The secondary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip BMD from pre-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment. The study involved an eligibility visit and up to three follow-up consultations at 12, 18 and/or 24 months after the end of treatment in either PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>Patients given an end-of-treatment DEXA scan within 35 days of their last treatment were invited to participate in the PRIMROSE 3 study. Those who were pregnant or unable to undergo a DEXA scan on the same type of equipment as used for the end-of-treatment DEXA scan in PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2 were not eligible for this trial. A total of 137 subjects were screened, 134 (97.8%) of whom were enrolled and 130 (94.9%) included in the safety analysis set. Subject groups were small and ranged from 7 subjects (placebo group) to 30 subjects (200 mg/200 mg+ABT group). Most subjects (n = 110, 80.3%) completed the study by evaluation of their BMD by DEXA at 2 years post-treatment.This study (EudraCT number: 2021-000452-19) was conducted at 3 sites in Bulgaria, 4 sites in the Czech Republic, 4 sites in Hungary, 1 site in Latvia, 6 sites in Poland, 1 site in Romania, 5 sites in Ukraine, and 32 sites in the USA.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>The most notable percentage increase from the end of treatment to month 24 was in the 200 mg/200 mg+ABT treatment group, which was also the group showing the greatest mean percentage BMD loss during linzagolix treatment. This marked upturn in BMD after cessation of treatment demonstrated the crucial role of ABT.Percentage changes in lumbar spine BMD from the pre-treatment baseline to month 24 (secondary endpoint) remained above -2% in all linzagolix treatment groups. Small BMD modifications observed from both the post-treatment and pre-treatment baseline to month 24 after the end of therapy may not have any clinically relevant impact on overall bone health of linzagolix-treated individuals, since the <i>Z</i>-score of most subjects was within the expected range for age. In addition, changes in BMD values and <i>Z</i>-scores in the linzagolix treatment groups were mostly within the same range as in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>The number of patients is relatively small. Since interpretation of results from the month-12 and month-18 visits is limited due to the small number of subjects in each treatment arm at corresponding time points, giving rise to high data variability, this manuscript focuses on the month-24 visit only.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>It can be assumed that the small BMD changes observed from both the post-treatment and pre-treatment baseline to month 24 after cessation of therapy may not have any clinically relevant impact on overall bone health of linzagolix-treated individuals.Changes in BMD values and <i>Z</i>-scores in the linzagolix treatment groups were mostly within the same range as in the placebo group, indicating that there are no long-term consequences on BMD after the end of linzagolix treatment.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>Funding for the PRIMROSE studies was provided by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland). Analysis of data was partially supported by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland), Theramex (London, UK), and Kissei (Japan). Grant 5/4/150/5 was awarded to M.-M.D. by the FNRS.J.D. was a member of the scientific advisory board of ObsEva and Preglem until 2023 and reports consulting fees from ObsEva, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. F.P. has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Theramex. H.T. has received grants from Abbvie, reports consulting fees from ObsEva and Gedeon Richter, has a patent on endometriosis biomarkers owned by Yale University, and was a past president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). C.B. was a member of the independent data monitoring board for the PRIMROSE trials and member of the advisory board for Spirit 1 and 2 trials. He was also the Chair for the ESHRE endometriosis guideline committee. Consulting fees from Myovant and Theramex went to the University of Oxford. S.B. has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Theramex. F.C.H. reports consulting fees and honoraria for lectures, presentations, or educational events from Theramex and Gedeon Richter and receiving honoraria for participation in a data safety monitoring board for Organon. M.P. was a principal investigator in the ObsEva-sponsored PRIMROSE 2 and 3 trials. E.B. and S.H. are employees of Theramex. M.-M.D. has received fees for lectures from Gedeon Richter and Theramex.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>EudraCT number: 2021-000452-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2025 3","pages":"hoaf025"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaf025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: How important was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) from post-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment in PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 study participants?

Summary answer: In the present study (PRIMROSE 3), mean percentage changes in lumbar spine BMD from the post-treatment baseline to month 24 (primary endpoint) were small in most treatment groups and similar to variations in the placebo group.

What is known already: Due to its mechanism of action, some BMD decreases are observed with oral GnRH antagonist treatment, depending on the dose administered and addition or not of add-back therapy (ABT) (1 mg oestradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate). In PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2, no significant changes in BMD were observed in any of the three anatomic sites investigated (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip) in any of the treated groups but one. Indeed, at 24 weeks, mean differences were most pronounced in the lumbar spine in participants given 200 mg linzagolix alone.

Study design size duration: PRIMROSE 3 is a long-term follow-up study on BMD in subjects who completed at least 20 weeks of treatment in the main linzagolix trials (PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2) and underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) within 35 days of their last treatment (week 24 or week 52 [extension study]). The primary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip BMD from post-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment in PRIMROSE 1 and PRIMROSE 2 study participants. The secondary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip BMD from pre-treatment baseline values to 24 months after the end of treatment. The study involved an eligibility visit and up to three follow-up consultations at 12, 18 and/or 24 months after the end of treatment in either PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2.

Participants/materials setting methods: Patients given an end-of-treatment DEXA scan within 35 days of their last treatment were invited to participate in the PRIMROSE 3 study. Those who were pregnant or unable to undergo a DEXA scan on the same type of equipment as used for the end-of-treatment DEXA scan in PRIMROSE 1 or PRIMROSE 2 were not eligible for this trial. A total of 137 subjects were screened, 134 (97.8%) of whom were enrolled and 130 (94.9%) included in the safety analysis set. Subject groups were small and ranged from 7 subjects (placebo group) to 30 subjects (200 mg/200 mg+ABT group). Most subjects (n = 110, 80.3%) completed the study by evaluation of their BMD by DEXA at 2 years post-treatment.This study (EudraCT number: 2021-000452-19) was conducted at 3 sites in Bulgaria, 4 sites in the Czech Republic, 4 sites in Hungary, 1 site in Latvia, 6 sites in Poland, 1 site in Romania, 5 sites in Ukraine, and 32 sites in the USA.

Main results and the role of chance: The most notable percentage increase from the end of treatment to month 24 was in the 200 mg/200 mg+ABT treatment group, which was also the group showing the greatest mean percentage BMD loss during linzagolix treatment. This marked upturn in BMD after cessation of treatment demonstrated the crucial role of ABT.Percentage changes in lumbar spine BMD from the pre-treatment baseline to month 24 (secondary endpoint) remained above -2% in all linzagolix treatment groups. Small BMD modifications observed from both the post-treatment and pre-treatment baseline to month 24 after the end of therapy may not have any clinically relevant impact on overall bone health of linzagolix-treated individuals, since the Z-score of most subjects was within the expected range for age. In addition, changes in BMD values and Z-scores in the linzagolix treatment groups were mostly within the same range as in the placebo group.

Limitations reasons for caution: The number of patients is relatively small. Since interpretation of results from the month-12 and month-18 visits is limited due to the small number of subjects in each treatment arm at corresponding time points, giving rise to high data variability, this manuscript focuses on the month-24 visit only.

Wider implications of the findings: It can be assumed that the small BMD changes observed from both the post-treatment and pre-treatment baseline to month 24 after cessation of therapy may not have any clinically relevant impact on overall bone health of linzagolix-treated individuals.Changes in BMD values and Z-scores in the linzagolix treatment groups were mostly within the same range as in the placebo group, indicating that there are no long-term consequences on BMD after the end of linzagolix treatment.

Study funding/competing interests: Funding for the PRIMROSE studies was provided by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland). Analysis of data was partially supported by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland), Theramex (London, UK), and Kissei (Japan). Grant 5/4/150/5 was awarded to M.-M.D. by the FNRS.J.D. was a member of the scientific advisory board of ObsEva and Preglem until 2023 and reports consulting fees from ObsEva, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. F.P. has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Theramex. H.T. has received grants from Abbvie, reports consulting fees from ObsEva and Gedeon Richter, has a patent on endometriosis biomarkers owned by Yale University, and was a past president of American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). C.B. was a member of the independent data monitoring board for the PRIMROSE trials and member of the advisory board for Spirit 1 and 2 trials. He was also the Chair for the ESHRE endometriosis guideline committee. Consulting fees from Myovant and Theramex went to the University of Oxford. S.B. has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Theramex. F.C.H. reports consulting fees and honoraria for lectures, presentations, or educational events from Theramex and Gedeon Richter and receiving honoraria for participation in a data safety monitoring board for Organon. M.P. was a principal investigator in the ObsEva-sponsored PRIMROSE 2 and 3 trials. E.B. and S.H. are employees of Theramex. M.-M.D. has received fees for lectures from Gedeon Richter and Theramex.

Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2021-000452-19.

为期两年的随访研究(PRIMROSE 3)评估完成PRIMROSE 1和PRIMROSE 2 linzagolix试验的子宫肌瘤患者的骨矿物质密度。
研究问题:PRIMROSE 1和PRIMROSE 2研究参与者的腰椎(L1-L4)、股骨颈和髋部总骨密度(BMD)从治疗后基线值到治疗结束后24个月的变化有多重要?摘要回答:在本研究中(PRIMROSE 3),大多数治疗组从治疗后基线到第24个月(主要终点)腰椎骨密度的平均百分比变化很小,与安慰剂组的变化相似。已知情况:由于其作用机制,口服GnRH拮抗剂治疗可观察到一些骨密度降低,这取决于给药剂量和是否添加加回治疗(ABT) (1mg雌二醇和0.5 mg醋酸去甲睾酮)。在PRIMROSE 1和PRIMROSE 2中,除了一个治疗组外,其他治疗组的三个解剖部位(腰椎、股骨颈和全髋关节)的骨密度均未发生显著变化。事实上,在24周时,单独给予200毫克林扎哥利克斯的参与者腰椎的平均差异最为明显。研究设计规模持续时间:PRIMROSE 3是一项长期随访研究,研究对象为完成了至少20周的linzagolix主要试验(PRIMROSE 1或PRIMROSE 2)治疗并在最后一次治疗(第24周或第52周[扩展研究])后35天内接受双能x射线吸收测定(DEXA)的受试者。主要终点是PRIMROSE 1和PRIMROSE 2研究参与者的腰椎(L1-L4)、股骨颈和全髋关节骨密度从治疗后基线值到治疗结束后24个月的变化。次要终点是治疗结束后24个月腰椎(L1-L4)、股骨颈和全髋关节骨密度从治疗前基线值的变化。该研究包括在PRIMROSE 1或PRIMROSE 2治疗结束后的12、18和/或24个月进行合格访问和最多三次随访咨询。受试者/材料设置方法:在最后一次治疗后35天内给予治疗结束DEXA扫描的患者被邀请参加PRIMROSE 3研究。怀孕或无法在与PRIMROSE 1或PRIMROSE 2治疗结束DEXA扫描相同类型的设备上进行DEXA扫描的患者不符合本试验的条件。共筛选137例受试者,其中134例(97.8%)入组,130例(94.9%)纳入安全性分析集。受试者组较小,从7名受试者(安慰剂组)到30名受试者(200 mg/200 mg+ABT组)。大多数受试者(n = 110, 80.3%)在治疗后2年通过DEXA评估骨密度完成研究。本研究(EudraCT编号:2021-000452-19)在保加利亚的3个地点、捷克共和国的4个地点、匈牙利的4个地点、拉脱维亚的1个地点、波兰的6个地点、罗马尼亚的1个地点、乌克兰的5个地点和美国的32个地点进行。主要结果和机会的作用:从治疗结束到第24个月,200 mg/200 mg+ABT治疗组的骨密度增加百分比最显著,也是林扎哥利克斯治疗期间骨密度平均百分比损失最大的组。停止治疗后骨密度的显著上升表明了abt的关键作用。从治疗前基线到第24个月(次要终点),所有林扎高利治疗组腰椎骨密度的百分比变化保持在-2%以上。从治疗后和治疗前基线到治疗结束后的第24个月,观察到的小BMD变化可能不会对林扎戈利治疗个体的整体骨骼健康产生任何临床相关影响,因为大多数受试者的z分数在年龄的预期范围内。此外,林扎哥利治疗组的BMD值和z评分的变化与安慰剂组基本相同。局限性:患者数量相对较少。由于每个治疗组在相应时间点的受试者数量较少,对第12个月和第18个月随访结果的解释有限,从而导致数据的高度可变性,因此本文仅关注第24个月的随访。研究结果的更广泛意义:可以假设,从治疗后和治疗前基线到停止治疗后24个月观察到的小BMD变化可能不会对linzagolix治疗个体的整体骨骼健康产生任何临床相关影响。林扎哥利斯治疗组骨密度值和z评分的变化与安慰剂组基本相同,表明林扎哥利斯治疗结束后对骨密度没有长期影响。研究经费/竞争利益:PRIMROSE研究的经费由ObsEva(日内瓦,瑞士)提供。数据分析得到ObsEva(瑞士日内瓦)、Theramex(英国伦敦)和Kissei(日本)的部分支持。补助金5/4/150/5由fnrs . jd授予m.m.d.。 直到2023年,他一直是ObsEva和Preglem的科学顾问委员会成员,并报告ObsEva、Gedeon Richter和Theramex的咨询费。fp收到了Theramex的咨询费和讲座酬金。H.T.获得了艾伯维(Abbvie)的资助,ObsEva和Gedeon Richter的咨询费用报告,拥有耶鲁大学拥有的子宫内膜异位症生物标志物专利,并且是美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)的前任主席。C.B.是PRIMROSE试验的独立数据监测委员会成员,也是Spirit 1和2试验的顾问委员会成员。他也是ESHRE子宫内膜异位症指导委员会的主席。Myovant和Theramex的咨询费归牛津大学所有。S.B.从Theramex获得了咨询费和演讲酬金。F.C.H.报告Theramex和Gedeon Richter的讲座、演讲或教育活动的咨询费和酬金,并因参与Organon的数据安全监测委员会而获得酬金。M.P.是obseva赞助的PRIMROSE 2和3试验的首席研究员。e。b。和s。h。是Theramex公司的员工。m.m.d.收到了Gedeon Richter和Theramex的讲座费用。试验注册号:审稿号:2021-000452-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信