Caregiving network precarity among community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Julia G Burgdorf, David Russell, Chanee D Fabius, Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer M Reckrey
{"title":"Caregiving network precarity among community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia.","authors":"Julia G Burgdorf, David Russell, Chanee D Fabius, Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer M Reckrey","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most persons with dementia live in the community, relying on caregiving networks to meet their needs. Caregiving network precarity refers to insecurity or instability in these networks, defined as caregiver(s) being unable or unwilling to continue in their role. Given the importance of caregiving to aging in place and the high burden associated with dementia caregiving, we sought to identify factors associated with caregiving network precarity for community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We linked 2021-2022 administrative, claims, and clinical assessment (baseline and follow-up) data for a diverse sample of community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia in New York State. We operationalized caregiving network precarity as having one or more caregivers report being unable or unwilling to continue providing care. We modelled incident caregiving network precarity as a function of care recipient characteristics, health services utilization, and caregiving network factors using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Declines in health status among care recipients were strongly associated with caregiving network precarity. Individuals were more likely to experience caregiving network precarity if they had recently experienced an increase in cognitive impairment (aOR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.97-4.51), functional impairment (aOR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.07-2.74), or bowel incontinence frequency (aOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.38-3.93), or began resisting care (aOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.69-3.61).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings highlight the importance of identifying and addressing shifts in care recipient status and offering targeted supports to caregivers during key inflection points in the care recipient's disease trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Most persons with dementia live in the community, relying on caregiving networks to meet their needs. Caregiving network precarity refers to insecurity or instability in these networks, defined as caregiver(s) being unable or unwilling to continue in their role. Given the importance of caregiving to aging in place and the high burden associated with dementia caregiving, we sought to identify factors associated with caregiving network precarity for community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia.

Research design and methods: We linked 2021-2022 administrative, claims, and clinical assessment (baseline and follow-up) data for a diverse sample of community-living, dually enrolled persons with dementia in New York State. We operationalized caregiving network precarity as having one or more caregivers report being unable or unwilling to continue providing care. We modelled incident caregiving network precarity as a function of care recipient characteristics, health services utilization, and caregiving network factors using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Declines in health status among care recipients were strongly associated with caregiving network precarity. Individuals were more likely to experience caregiving network precarity if they had recently experienced an increase in cognitive impairment (aOR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.97-4.51), functional impairment (aOR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.07-2.74), or bowel incontinence frequency (aOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.38-3.93), or began resisting care (aOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.69-3.61).

Discussion and implications: Findings highlight the importance of identifying and addressing shifts in care recipient status and offering targeted supports to caregivers during key inflection points in the care recipient's disease trajectory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区生活、双重登记的痴呆症患者护理网络的不稳定性。
背景和目的:大多数痴呆症患者生活在社区,依靠护理网络来满足他们的需求。看护网络不稳定性指的是这些网络中的不安全感或不稳定性,定义为照顾者不能或不愿继续扮演他们的角色。考虑到护理对老年人的重要性以及与痴呆症护理相关的高负担,我们试图确定与社区生活、双入组的痴呆症患者护理网络不稳定性相关的因素。研究设计和方法:我们将2021-2022年的行政、索赔和临床评估(基线和随访)数据与纽约州社区生活、双入组的痴呆症患者的不同样本相关联。我们将护理网络不稳定性作为一个或多个护理人员报告无法或不愿继续提供护理的情况进行操作。我们使用多变量逻辑回归将事件护理网络不稳定性建模为受照护者特征、卫生服务利用和护理网络因素的函数。结果:受照护者健康状况的下降与照护网络的不稳定性密切相关。如果个体最近经历过认知障碍的增加,他们更有可能经历照顾网络的不稳定性(aOR: 2.98;95% CI: 1.97-4.51),功能障碍(aOR: 1.71;95% CI: 1.07-2.74)或肠失禁频率(aOR: 2.33;95% CI: 1.38-3.93),或开始抵抗护理(aOR: 2.47;95% ci: 1.69-3.61)。讨论和启示:研究结果强调了识别和解决护理对象状态变化的重要性,并在护理对象疾病轨迹的关键拐点为护理人员提供有针对性的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信