Speech-language Telepractice Services During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Perspectives from Parents in Malaysia.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
International Journal of Telerehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.63144/ijt.2025.6650
Jing Feng, Xiao P Choong, Pui J Woi, Siaw C Chai, Tian K Quar, Jaehoon Lee, Shin Y Chu
{"title":"Speech-language Telepractice Services During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Perspectives from Parents in Malaysia.","authors":"Jing Feng, Xiao P Choong, Pui J Woi, Siaw C Chai, Tian K Quar, Jaehoon Lee, Shin Y Chu","doi":"10.63144/ijt.2025.6650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores Malaysian parents' perspectives on speech-language pathology (SLP) telepractice services during the COVID-19 lockdown. SLP services for families living in rural areas of Malaysia can be challenging, due to travel issues associated with distance, transportation costs, scheduling conflicts, and for patients with restricted physical mobility. To investigate the efficacy of SLP services in Malaysia during the COVID-19 lockdown, 70 parents' preferences and perspectives were explored via a survey of demographics, service engagement, and views on telepractice. During lockdown, 48.6% of children received in-person speech-language services, while 38.6% received telepractice or combined services. Of those receiving services, 91.2% reported benefits, but 70.4% disagreed that telepractice could replace in-person sessions. Parents reported children's attention span and rapport-building challenges with telepractice. Attitudes about telepractice varied: 14.3% positive, 60% negative, 25.7% neutral. Open-ended responses revealed that some held a preference for in-person services due to attention, communication, and technological barriers. The telepractice benefits noted were parental involvement and convenience. The findings suggest a shift toward remote therapy during the COVID-19 lockdown, with positive parental perceptions. However, doubts remain about the ability of telepractice to fully replace in-person sessions, warranting further research on therapy effectiveness and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"6650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.63144/ijt.2025.6650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores Malaysian parents' perspectives on speech-language pathology (SLP) telepractice services during the COVID-19 lockdown. SLP services for families living in rural areas of Malaysia can be challenging, due to travel issues associated with distance, transportation costs, scheduling conflicts, and for patients with restricted physical mobility. To investigate the efficacy of SLP services in Malaysia during the COVID-19 lockdown, 70 parents' preferences and perspectives were explored via a survey of demographics, service engagement, and views on telepractice. During lockdown, 48.6% of children received in-person speech-language services, while 38.6% received telepractice or combined services. Of those receiving services, 91.2% reported benefits, but 70.4% disagreed that telepractice could replace in-person sessions. Parents reported children's attention span and rapport-building challenges with telepractice. Attitudes about telepractice varied: 14.3% positive, 60% negative, 25.7% neutral. Open-ended responses revealed that some held a preference for in-person services due to attention, communication, and technological barriers. The telepractice benefits noted were parental involvement and convenience. The findings suggest a shift toward remote therapy during the COVID-19 lockdown, with positive parental perceptions. However, doubts remain about the ability of telepractice to fully replace in-person sessions, warranting further research on therapy effectiveness and limitations.

COVID-19封锁期间的语音远程练习服务:来自马来西亚父母的观点。
本研究探讨了马来西亚父母在COVID-19封锁期间对语言病理学(SLP)远程医疗服务的看法。对于生活在马来西亚农村地区的家庭来说,SLP服务可能具有挑战性,因为与距离、交通费用、日程冲突相关的旅行问题,以及身体活动受限的患者。为了调查2019冠状病毒病封锁期间马来西亚SLP服务的效果,我们通过人口统计、服务参与度和远程医疗观点调查,探讨了70名家长的偏好和观点。在封锁期间,48.6%的儿童接受了面对面的语言服务,38.6%的儿童接受了远程练习或综合服务。在接受服务的人中,91.2%的人表示受益,但70.4%的人不认为远程治疗可以取代面对面的治疗。家长们报告说,远程练习对孩子的注意力持续时间和建立融洽关系带来了挑战。对远程医疗的态度各不相同:14.3%的人持肯定态度,60%的人持否定态度,25.7%的人持中立态度。开放式回答显示,由于注意力、沟通和技术障碍,一些人更喜欢面对面的服务。远程医疗的好处是父母的参与和方便。研究结果表明,在COVID-19封锁期间,家长对远程治疗的看法有所转变。然而,远程治疗能否完全取代面对面治疗的能力仍然存在疑问,这需要进一步研究治疗的有效性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信