The influence of dual-task activities on spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040251351403
Verônica Filter de Andrade, Alesandra Costa, Laura Buzin Zapparoli, Natara de Boni Pioner, Fernanda Cechetti, Raquel Saccani, Diego Busin, Guilherme Auler Brodt, Leandro Viçosa Bonetti
{"title":"The influence of dual-task activities on spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with cardiovascular diseases.","authors":"Verônica Filter de Andrade, Alesandra Costa, Laura Buzin Zapparoli, Natara de Boni Pioner, Fernanda Cechetti, Raquel Saccani, Diego Busin, Guilherme Auler Brodt, Leandro Viçosa Bonetti","doi":"10.1177/20480040251351403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of dual-task (DT) on the spatiotemporal gait parameters of patients with cardiovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was an observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Participants: The study included 28 males, aged between 51 and 77 years, divided into two groups: Cardiovascular Disease Group (CVDG - N = 14) and Control Group (CG - N = 14). Main outcome measures: Participants performed the simple gait task and dual-task activities (including the cognitive and gait tasks) in a motion analysis system. For statistical analysis, it was conducted a mixed analysis of variance (Mixed ANOVA) and for significant main effects (condition or group) or interactions (group × condition) it was performed post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. A significance level (alpha) of 0.05 was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group comparisons revealed a significant difference solely in step width, where the CVDG showed lower mean values than the CG (p = 0.001). However, DTs similarly affected both groups, resulting in significant reductions in gait speed (p = 0.000), cadence (p = 0.002), step length (p = 0.000), and stride time (p = 0.007). Regarding the interaction effect, the CVDG exhibited a significantly longer step time during the verbal fluency and arithmetic DT conditions when compared to their own performance in the simple gait condition (p = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences between groups were found in both single-task and DTs gait across most of the analyzed parameters. Additionally, DT activities similarly affected the gait parameters of both groups. Although cardiovascular diseases are commonly associated with motor and cognitive declines, DTs did not affect participants with cardiovascular impairment differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"20480040251351403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040251351403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of dual-task (DT) on the spatiotemporal gait parameters of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Design: This was an observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Participants: The study included 28 males, aged between 51 and 77 years, divided into two groups: Cardiovascular Disease Group (CVDG - N = 14) and Control Group (CG - N = 14). Main outcome measures: Participants performed the simple gait task and dual-task activities (including the cognitive and gait tasks) in a motion analysis system. For statistical analysis, it was conducted a mixed analysis of variance (Mixed ANOVA) and for significant main effects (condition or group) or interactions (group × condition) it was performed post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. A significance level (alpha) of 0.05 was set.

Results: Group comparisons revealed a significant difference solely in step width, where the CVDG showed lower mean values than the CG (p = 0.001). However, DTs similarly affected both groups, resulting in significant reductions in gait speed (p = 0.000), cadence (p = 0.002), step length (p = 0.000), and stride time (p = 0.007). Regarding the interaction effect, the CVDG exhibited a significantly longer step time during the verbal fluency and arithmetic DT conditions when compared to their own performance in the simple gait condition (p = 0.037).

Conclusions: No significant differences between groups were found in both single-task and DTs gait across most of the analyzed parameters. Additionally, DT activities similarly affected the gait parameters of both groups. Although cardiovascular diseases are commonly associated with motor and cognitive declines, DTs did not affect participants with cardiovascular impairment differently.

双任务活动对心血管疾病患者时空步态参数的影响
目的:探讨双任务训练对心血管疾病患者时空步态参数的影响。设计:这是一项观察性、横断面和比较研究。研究对象:年龄51 ~ 77岁的男性28例,分为心血管疾病组(CVDG - N = 14)和对照组(CG - N = 14)。主要结果测量:参与者在运动分析系统中完成简单的步态任务和双任务活动(包括认知和步态任务)。对于统计分析,采用混合方差分析(mixed ANOVA),对于显著的主效应(条件或组)或相互作用(组×条件),采用Bonferroni校正的事后检验。显著性水平(alpha)为0.05。结果:组间比较显示仅在步宽上有显著差异,其中CVDG的平均值低于CG (p = 0.001)。然而,DTs对两组的影响相似,导致步态速度(p = 0.000),节奏(p = 0.002),步长(p = 0.000)和步幅时间(p = 0.007)的显着降低。在交互作用方面,CVDG在语言流利和算术DT条件下的步长明显长于其在简单步态条件下的表现(p = 0.037)。结论:在大多数分析参数中,单任务和DTs步态在组间无显著差异。此外,DT活动相似地影响两组的步态参数。虽然心血管疾病通常与运动和认知能力下降有关,但DTs对心血管损伤的参与者没有不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信