Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira
{"title":"Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement. Treatment options remain controversial, with limited evidence guiding the choice between surgical and conservative approaches. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify clinical trials comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test. We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I<sup>2</sup> = 60%). Subgroup analyses of the excision surgery group revealed no differences between approaches. Our main findings indicated no significant difference in bleeding between surgery and conservative treatment groups. However, operative management is associated with significantly lower recurrences, which should be the preferred choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement. Treatment options remain controversial, with limited evidence guiding the choice between surgical and conservative approaches. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify clinical trials comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I2 = 54%). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I2 = 60%). Subgroup analyses of the excision surgery group revealed no differences between approaches. Our main findings indicated no significant difference in bleeding between surgery and conservative treatment groups. However, operative management is associated with significantly lower recurrences, which should be the preferred choice.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.