Adverse Drug Reactions to SGLT2i Reported by Type 2 Diabetes New Users: An Active Surveillance Study.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.3390/ph18060904
Camelia Bucșa, Ioana Frenț, Ramona Stefan, Adriana Fodor, Georgeta Inceu, Andreea Farcaș, Adriana Rusu, Monica Negovan, Cristina Mogoșan
{"title":"Adverse Drug Reactions to SGLT2i Reported by Type 2 Diabetes New Users: An Active Surveillance Study.","authors":"Camelia Bucșa, Ioana Frenț, Ramona Stefan, Adriana Fodor, Georgeta Inceu, Andreea Farcaș, Adriana Rusu, Monica Negovan, Cristina Mogoșan","doi":"10.3390/ph18060904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patients' perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may be used to update the safety profile of a drug. We aimed to prospectively follow-up on type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients who were new users of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and to characterize the patient-reported ADRs within routine practice in Romania. <b>Methods</b>: T2D patients from ambulatory settings were interviewed over the phone based on standardized forms, at four time-points across 12 months. We captured the patients' history and auto-medication, as well as any ADR that implied causality to SGLT2i, based on the patient's perspective. <b>Results</b>: In total, 64 patients, with genders being equally represented and with a median age of 59 years (Q1, Q3: 51, 64) were followed-up with. We identified 73 ADRs to SGLT2i that were suspected to be associated with the drug, with an average of 2.35 ADRs per patient (range 0-7 ADRs/patient). The most reported ADR was pollakiuria (7; 9.58%), followed by vulvovaginal candidiasis (6; 8.21%), dysuria (4; 5.47%), and hypoglycemia (4; 5.47%). SGLT2i treatment was interrupted for eight patients. Three (4.10%) ADRs were considered serious as important medical events (hypertensive crisis, angina pectoris, and dyspnea). A positive dechallenge was recorded for 14 ADRs, of which 9 ADRs had a positive rechallenge as well. A probable causality was assessed for 13 of the 73 patient-reported ADRs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Most of the identified ADRs were in line with the known safety profile of SGLT2i. Only three ADRs were serious and unexpected relative to the safety profile, but these had confounding factors that could explain the reactions. Therefore, no new safety concerns related to SGLT2i were determined in this observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18060904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Patients' perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may be used to update the safety profile of a drug. We aimed to prospectively follow-up on type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients who were new users of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and to characterize the patient-reported ADRs within routine practice in Romania. Methods: T2D patients from ambulatory settings were interviewed over the phone based on standardized forms, at four time-points across 12 months. We captured the patients' history and auto-medication, as well as any ADR that implied causality to SGLT2i, based on the patient's perspective. Results: In total, 64 patients, with genders being equally represented and with a median age of 59 years (Q1, Q3: 51, 64) were followed-up with. We identified 73 ADRs to SGLT2i that were suspected to be associated with the drug, with an average of 2.35 ADRs per patient (range 0-7 ADRs/patient). The most reported ADR was pollakiuria (7; 9.58%), followed by vulvovaginal candidiasis (6; 8.21%), dysuria (4; 5.47%), and hypoglycemia (4; 5.47%). SGLT2i treatment was interrupted for eight patients. Three (4.10%) ADRs were considered serious as important medical events (hypertensive crisis, angina pectoris, and dyspnea). A positive dechallenge was recorded for 14 ADRs, of which 9 ADRs had a positive rechallenge as well. A probable causality was assessed for 13 of the 73 patient-reported ADRs. Conclusions: Most of the identified ADRs were in line with the known safety profile of SGLT2i. Only three ADRs were serious and unexpected relative to the safety profile, but these had confounding factors that could explain the reactions. Therefore, no new safety concerns related to SGLT2i were determined in this observational study.

2型糖尿病新使用者报告的SGLT2i药物不良反应:一项主动监测研究
背景/目的:患者对药物不良反应(adr)的看法可用于更新药物的安全性。我们的目的是前瞻性随访2型糖尿病(T2D)患者,这些患者是钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的新使用者,并在罗马尼亚的常规实践中描述患者报告的不良反应。方法:基于标准化表格,在12个月内的4个时间点对门诊T2D患者进行电话访谈。根据患者的观点,我们收集了患者的病史和自动用药情况,以及任何暗示与SGLT2i有因果关系的不良反应。结果:共随访64例患者,性别平等,中位年龄59岁(Q1, Q3: 51, 64)。我们确定了73例SGLT2i的不良反应,这些不良反应被怀疑与该药物有关,平均每位患者有2.35例不良反应(范围0-7例)。报告最多的不良反应是polakiuria (7;9.58%),其次是外阴阴道念珠菌病(6;8.21%),排尿困难(4;5.47%),低血糖(4;5.47%)。8名患者中断了SGLT2i治疗。3例(4.10%)不良反应被认为是严重的重要医学事件(高血压危象、心绞痛和呼吸困难)。14例adr出现正面挑战,其中9例adr出现正面挑战。对73例患者报告的不良反应中的13例进行了可能的因果关系评估。结论:大多数确定的不良反应符合SGLT2i已知的安全性。相对于安全性而言,只有三种不良反应是严重和意外的,但这些不良反应具有可以解释反应的混杂因素。因此,在这项观察性研究中没有确定与SGLT2i相关的新的安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信