Beyond Pro- and Anti-Contact: Understanding the Ideologies of People Attracted to Children.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Rebecca Lievesley, Craig A Harper, Alisha Awan, Allen Bishop
{"title":"Beyond Pro- and Anti-Contact: Understanding the Ideologies of People Attracted to Children.","authors":"Rebecca Lievesley, Craig A Harper, Alisha Awan, Allen Bishop","doi":"10.1080/0092623X.2025.2522664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past decade, there has been increased academic and social attention paid to people who are living in the community and experience sexual and/or romantic attractions to children. Most of this attention has focused on determining risk or identifying treatment needs in abuse prevention contexts. However, research into the ideologies (broadly defined as action-oriented belief systems) of people within this community is still scarce. This paper challenges the common assumption that people who are attracted to children are divisible into pro-contact and anti-contact groups on the issue of sexual interactions with children. Using one of the largest currently available online studies of individuals who are attracted to children (<i>N</i> = 389), a model and associated measurement tool is developed to show how ideological positioning is associated with views about the permissibility of sexual contact with children and the extent to which people experience self-acceptance. The data demonstrate how these ideological positions are linked to different self-labeling, treatment needs, and risk. This paper provides a novel framework for understanding the effects of different ideological positions for clinical practice and provide a professional assessment tool for use by therapists working with this population in treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2025.2522664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been increased academic and social attention paid to people who are living in the community and experience sexual and/or romantic attractions to children. Most of this attention has focused on determining risk or identifying treatment needs in abuse prevention contexts. However, research into the ideologies (broadly defined as action-oriented belief systems) of people within this community is still scarce. This paper challenges the common assumption that people who are attracted to children are divisible into pro-contact and anti-contact groups on the issue of sexual interactions with children. Using one of the largest currently available online studies of individuals who are attracted to children (N = 389), a model and associated measurement tool is developed to show how ideological positioning is associated with views about the permissibility of sexual contact with children and the extent to which people experience self-acceptance. The data demonstrate how these ideological positions are linked to different self-labeling, treatment needs, and risk. This paper provides a novel framework for understanding the effects of different ideological positions for clinical practice and provide a professional assessment tool for use by therapists working with this population in treatment settings.

超越亲与反接触:了解被儿童吸引的人的意识形态。
在过去的十年里,学术界和社会越来越关注那些生活在社区里,对儿童有性和/或浪漫吸引力的人。这种关注大多集中在确定风险或确定预防虐待背景下的治疗需要。然而,对这个群体中人们的意识形态(广义上定义为以行动为导向的信仰体系)的研究仍然很少。这篇论文挑战了一种普遍的假设,即在与儿童的性互动问题上,被儿童吸引的人可以分为亲接触组和反接触组。利用目前最大的一项关于被儿童吸引的个人的在线研究(N = 389),开发了一个模型和相关的测量工具,以显示意识形态定位如何与与儿童发生性接触的允许程度以及人们体验自我接受的程度相关联。数据表明,这些意识形态立场与不同的自我标签、治疗需求和风险是如何联系在一起的。本文为理解不同意识形态立场对临床实践的影响提供了一个新的框架,并为治疗师在治疗环境中与这一人群一起工作提供了一个专业的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy is one of the top independent journals in the field. Under the prestigious leadership of R. Taylor Seagraves, M.D. - one of the world" foremost experts in sex and marital therapy -- JSMT is an active and contemporary forum reflecting the most viable developments emanating from the U.S. and abroad. JSMT continues to break new ground with innovative research and clinical writing, and the editor is committed to showcasing the most far-reaching traditional and contemporary thinking from all sources. You will read about therapeutic techniques, outcome, special clinical and medical problems, and the theoretical parameters of sexual functioning, and marital relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信