Medication Mindfulness: Implementation and Evaluation of a Single-Site, 6-month Deprescribing Intervention for Patients on Hemodialysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000884
Noah Zlotnik, Angelina Abbaticchio, Madeline Theodorlis, Michelle S Cross, Abhijat Kitchlu, Jo-Anne Wilson, Anna R Gagliardi, Marisa Battistella
{"title":"Medication Mindfulness: Implementation and Evaluation of a Single-Site, 6-month Deprescribing Intervention for Patients on Hemodialysis.","authors":"Noah Zlotnik, Angelina Abbaticchio, Madeline Theodorlis, Michelle S Cross, Abhijat Kitchlu, Jo-Anne Wilson, Anna R Gagliardi, Marisa Battistella","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are at increased risk for polypharmacy-related adverse events (AEs). Deprescribing may optimize medication use and mitigate the harmful effects of polypharmacy, but its application in patients on HD remains understudied. The overall aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a deprescribing intervention utilizing a deprescribing toolkit in multiple HD units across Canada. This preliminary study aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the intervention within one HD unit in Toronto, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study included patients on HD for at least three months who were taking at least one of nine study medication classes. Clinicians applied deprescribing algorithms to determine if deprescribing was recommended. Clinicians and patients could decline the algorithm's recommendation. Primary outcomes include the number of patients successfully deprescribed by discontinuing or reducing the dose of their medication over 6 months, and clinically significant AEs. Secondary outcomes include clinician and patient acceptance of algorithm recommendations, and clinical monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients were taking an average of 13.47 (+4.01) medications, with an average of 2.32 (+1.00) being study medications. The algorithms recommended 40 patients to deprescribe 49 study medications. Clinicians agreed to 39 (80%) recommendations, and patients agreed to 28 of those 39 (72%). Twenty patients successfully deprescribed 23 medications (82%), while 5 patients failed and restarted 5 medications (18%) at their baseline dose. Clinical monitoring and spontaneous reporting revealed no AEs considered related to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 1 in 5 eligible patients successfully deprescribed a medication with minimal clinical detriment. While the deprescribing algorithms are valuable in guiding clinical decision-making, final decisions rest with clinicians, constituting a careful synthesis of potential benefits, risks, and goals of care for each individual patient. Future research will analyze deprescribing outcomes at additional HD units in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are at increased risk for polypharmacy-related adverse events (AEs). Deprescribing may optimize medication use and mitigate the harmful effects of polypharmacy, but its application in patients on HD remains understudied. The overall aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a deprescribing intervention utilizing a deprescribing toolkit in multiple HD units across Canada. This preliminary study aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the intervention within one HD unit in Toronto, Canada.

Methods: This single-center study included patients on HD for at least three months who were taking at least one of nine study medication classes. Clinicians applied deprescribing algorithms to determine if deprescribing was recommended. Clinicians and patients could decline the algorithm's recommendation. Primary outcomes include the number of patients successfully deprescribed by discontinuing or reducing the dose of their medication over 6 months, and clinically significant AEs. Secondary outcomes include clinician and patient acceptance of algorithm recommendations, and clinical monitoring.

Results: Ninety-eight patients were taking an average of 13.47 (+4.01) medications, with an average of 2.32 (+1.00) being study medications. The algorithms recommended 40 patients to deprescribe 49 study medications. Clinicians agreed to 39 (80%) recommendations, and patients agreed to 28 of those 39 (72%). Twenty patients successfully deprescribed 23 medications (82%), while 5 patients failed and restarted 5 medications (18%) at their baseline dose. Clinical monitoring and spontaneous reporting revealed no AEs considered related to the intervention.

Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 5 eligible patients successfully deprescribed a medication with minimal clinical detriment. While the deprescribing algorithms are valuable in guiding clinical decision-making, final decisions rest with clinicians, constituting a careful synthesis of potential benefits, risks, and goals of care for each individual patient. Future research will analyze deprescribing outcomes at additional HD units in Canada.

药物正念:对血液透析患者进行单点、6个月处方干预的实施和评价。
背景:血液透析(HD)患者发生多药相关不良事件(ae)的风险增加。开处方可以优化药物使用,减轻多种药物的有害影响,但其在HD患者中的应用仍有待研究。本研究的总体目的是在加拿大多个HD单位中利用处方减少工具包实施和评估处方减少干预的有效性和安全性。这项初步研究的目的是在加拿大多伦多的一个HD单位内证明干预的有效性和安全性。方法:这项单中心研究纳入了至少三个月的HD患者,这些患者至少服用了九种研究药物中的一种。临床医生应用开处方算法来确定是否推荐开处方。临床医生和患者可以拒绝算法的推荐。主要结局包括6个月内通过停药或减少药物剂量成功解除处方的患者数量,以及临床显著的不良反应。次要结果包括临床医生和患者对算法建议的接受程度以及临床监测。结果:98例患者平均用药13.47种(+4.01种),其中研究用药平均2.32种(+1.00种)。这些算法推荐了40名患者去开49种研究药物。临床医生同意39条(80%)建议,患者同意其中28条(72%)。20例患者成功停用23种药物(82%),5例患者失败并在基线剂量下重新开始使用5种药物(18%)。临床监测和自发报告未发现与干预相关的不良事件。结论:大约五分之一的符合条件的患者成功地开了一种药物,且临床损害最小。虽然处方描述算法在指导临床决策方面很有价值,但最终的决定取决于临床医生,这是对每个患者的潜在利益、风险和护理目标的仔细综合。未来的研究将分析加拿大其他HD单位的处方效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信