Analysis of 470,000 exome-sequenced UK biobank participants identifies genes containing rare variants which confer dementia risk.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lily Gibbons, David Curtis
{"title":"Analysis of 470,000 exome-sequenced UK biobank participants identifies genes containing rare variants which confer dementia risk.","authors":"Lily Gibbons, David Curtis","doi":"10.1080/01677063.2025.2522643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have reported that rare coding variants in a handful of genes have major effects on risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A recent exome wide association study (ExWAS) of dementia in a subset of the UK Biobank cohort implicated a number of genes, including five which were novel. Here we report a similar analysis, carried out on the full cohort of 470,000 exome-sequenced participants. A score was assigned to each participant depending on individual and/or parental diagnosis of dementia. Regression analysis including <i>APOE</i> ε3 and ε4 doses as covariates was applied to gene-wise tests for association with loss of function (LOF) and nonsynonymous variants. 45 tests using different pathogenicity predictors were applied to the first cohort of 200,000 participants. Subsequently the 100 genes showing strongest evidence for association were analysed in the second cohort of 270,000 participants, using only the best-performing predictor for each gene. Three genes achieved statistical significance, <i>TREM2</i>, <i>SORL1</i> and <i>ABCA7</i>. The five genes reported as novel in the ExWAS did not produce any appreciable evidence for association in this study. The effects and frequencies of variants in different functional categories were characterised for these genes. Rare coding variants in a small number of genes have important effects on dementia risk. Further study of individual variant effects might elucidate mechanisms of pathogenesis. Incorporating rare variant effects for individual risk assessment might become important if preventative treatments for dementia become available. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":16491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurogenetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2025.2522643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that rare coding variants in a handful of genes have major effects on risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A recent exome wide association study (ExWAS) of dementia in a subset of the UK Biobank cohort implicated a number of genes, including five which were novel. Here we report a similar analysis, carried out on the full cohort of 470,000 exome-sequenced participants. A score was assigned to each participant depending on individual and/or parental diagnosis of dementia. Regression analysis including APOE ε3 and ε4 doses as covariates was applied to gene-wise tests for association with loss of function (LOF) and nonsynonymous variants. 45 tests using different pathogenicity predictors were applied to the first cohort of 200,000 participants. Subsequently the 100 genes showing strongest evidence for association were analysed in the second cohort of 270,000 participants, using only the best-performing predictor for each gene. Three genes achieved statistical significance, TREM2, SORL1 and ABCA7. The five genes reported as novel in the ExWAS did not produce any appreciable evidence for association in this study. The effects and frequencies of variants in different functional categories were characterised for these genes. Rare coding variants in a small number of genes have important effects on dementia risk. Further study of individual variant effects might elucidate mechanisms of pathogenesis. Incorporating rare variant effects for individual risk assessment might become important if preventative treatments for dementia become available. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource.

对47万名英国生物银行参与者进行外显子组测序的分析发现,含有导致痴呆风险的罕见变异基因。
先前的研究报道了少数基因中罕见的编码变异对阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险有重大影响。最近在英国生物银行队列的一个子集中,痴呆的外显子组广泛关联研究(ExWAS)涉及许多基因,其中包括五个新基因。在这里,我们报告了一个类似的分析,对47万名外显子组测序的参与者进行了完整的队列研究。根据个人和/或父母对痴呆症的诊断,给每个参与者打分。以APOE ε3和ε4剂量为协变量的回归分析应用于与功能丧失(LOF)和非同义变异相关的基因检测。使用不同致病性预测因子的45项测试应用于20万参与者的第一个队列。随后,研究人员在第二组27万名参与者中分析了100个表现出最强关联证据的基因,对每个基因只使用表现最好的预测器。TREM2、SORL1和ABCA7三个基因具有统计学意义。在ExWAS中报道的五个新基因在本研究中没有产生任何明显的关联证据。对这些基因的不同功能类别的变异的影响和频率进行了表征。少数基因中罕见的编码变异对痴呆风险有重要影响。进一步研究个体变异效应可能有助于阐明发病机制。如果痴呆症的预防性治疗变得可行,将罕见的变异效应纳入个人风险评估可能变得重要。这项研究是利用英国生物银行资源进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurogenetics
Journal of neurogenetics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal is appropriate for papers on behavioral, biochemical, or cellular aspects of neural function, plasticity, aging or disease. In addition to analyses in the traditional genetic-model organisms, C. elegans, Drosophila, mouse and the zebrafish, the Journal encourages submission of neurogenetic investigations performed in organisms not easily amenable to experimental genetics. Such investigations might, for instance, describe behavioral differences deriving from genetic variation within a species, or report human disease studies that provide exceptional insights into biological mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信