The State of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Disease Management in the United States.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Margaret M Paul, Nandita Khera, Praneetha R Elugunti, Kevin C Ruff, Musab S Hommos, Leslie F Thomas, Vivek Nagaraja, Ashley L Garrett, Mari Pantoja-Smith, Nathan L Delafield, Blanca C Lizaola-Mayo, Molly M Kresin, Mahesh Seetharam, Sandhya R Nagarakanti, Manreet Kaur
{"title":"The State of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Disease Management in the United States.","authors":"Margaret M Paul, Nandita Khera, Praneetha R Elugunti, Kevin C Ruff, Musab S Hommos, Leslie F Thomas, Vivek Nagaraja, Ashley L Garrett, Mari Pantoja-Smith, Nathan L Delafield, Blanca C Lizaola-Mayo, Molly M Kresin, Mahesh Seetharam, Sandhya R Nagarakanti, Manreet Kaur","doi":"10.2196/70422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) increased exponentially during the COVID-19 pandemic. RPM programs commonly incorporate tools to capture and transmit health-relevant data from the home to the clinical space to augment the clinical decision-making process of health care providers. Given the potential to improve patient health outcomes, health care systems around the world are actively engaged in fashioning, implementing, and exploring the outcomes of various RPM program models. However, new challenges to health care systems include increasing RPM program enrollment, optimizing condition-specific RPM programs to best address the needs of specific patient groups, integrating new RPM-derived data streams into existing IT infrastructure, overcoming limited availability of desired remote monitoring technologies, and quantifying the health outcomes produced by RPM use. Herein, we identify stakeholders for RPM in the United States, summarize the landscape of RPM tools available for chronic disease management, discuss the current regulatory environment, delve into the benefits and challenges of integrating these tools into clinical practice, summarize aspects of coverage and reimbursement, and examine the knowledge and policy gaps regarding sustained use of RPM in clinical practice, along with associated opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e70422"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) increased exponentially during the COVID-19 pandemic. RPM programs commonly incorporate tools to capture and transmit health-relevant data from the home to the clinical space to augment the clinical decision-making process of health care providers. Given the potential to improve patient health outcomes, health care systems around the world are actively engaged in fashioning, implementing, and exploring the outcomes of various RPM program models. However, new challenges to health care systems include increasing RPM program enrollment, optimizing condition-specific RPM programs to best address the needs of specific patient groups, integrating new RPM-derived data streams into existing IT infrastructure, overcoming limited availability of desired remote monitoring technologies, and quantifying the health outcomes produced by RPM use. Herein, we identify stakeholders for RPM in the United States, summarize the landscape of RPM tools available for chronic disease management, discuss the current regulatory environment, delve into the benefits and challenges of integrating these tools into clinical practice, summarize aspects of coverage and reimbursement, and examine the knowledge and policy gaps regarding sustained use of RPM in clinical practice, along with associated opportunities.

美国慢性病管理的远程患者监测状况。
在COVID-19大流行期间,远程患者监测(RPM)呈指数级增长。RPM程序通常包含工具来捕获和传输从家庭到临床空间的健康相关数据,以增强医疗保健提供者的临床决策过程。鉴于改善患者健康结果的潜力,世界各地的卫生保健系统正在积极参与各种RPM计划模型的形成、实施和探索结果。然而,医疗保健系统面临的新挑战包括增加RPM计划的注册,优化特定条件的RPM计划以最好地满足特定患者群体的需求,将新的RPM衍生数据流集成到现有的IT基础设施中,克服所需远程监控技术的有限可用性,以及量化使用RPM产生的健康结果。在此,我们确定了美国RPM的利益相关者,总结了用于慢性疾病管理的RPM工具的前景,讨论了当前的监管环境,深入研究了将这些工具整合到临床实践中的好处和挑战,总结了覆盖和报销的各个方面,并检查了在临床实践中持续使用RPM的知识和政策差距,以及相关的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信