Aneesha Santhosh, Daniel Abazia, Jessica Lise, Nadia Awad
{"title":"Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam in an Academic Children's Hospital.","authors":"Aneesha Santhosh, Daniel Abazia, Jessica Lise, Nadia Awad","doi":"10.1177/08971900251355333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evidence supports the safe administration of levetiracetam as a rapid intravenous push (IVP) in patients experiencing breakthrough seizures or status epilepticus. Use of this route of administration may decrease morbidity and mortality by reducing time to medication delivery. Though this practice has become increasingly common in adults, the safety of IVP levetiracetam in pediatric patients is not well documented. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the safety of IVP levetiracetam in pediatric patients. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who received IV piggyback (IVPB) or IVP levetiracetam and were between the ages of 12 months and 18 years old were eligible for inclusion. Medication regimen data recorded includes the dose of levetiracetam, number of doses administered, and total days of administration. Additionally, time points related to order entry, pharmacist verification, and dose administration was recorded. Safety endpoints included rates of bradycardia, hypotension, behavioral changes, and cutaneous drug reactions. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. <b>Results:</b> This study showed IVP levetiracetam has a similar rate of adverse effects when compared to IVPB levetiracetam in patients over the age of one (5.5% vs 7.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.3589). In addition, there was improvement in the time to administration of levetiracetam (50 min in the IVPB group and 23 min in the IVP group [<i>P</i> = .0008]). <b>Conclusion:</b> Pediatric patients who received undiluted (100 mg/mL) levetiracetam IVP over 5 min had a similar adverse event incidence when compared to those who received the anti-epileptic drug (AED) as an IVPB. This evaluation demonstrated that doses up to 1500 mg of undiluted IVP levetiracetam is safe for pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251355333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251355333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Evidence supports the safe administration of levetiracetam as a rapid intravenous push (IVP) in patients experiencing breakthrough seizures or status epilepticus. Use of this route of administration may decrease morbidity and mortality by reducing time to medication delivery. Though this practice has become increasingly common in adults, the safety of IVP levetiracetam in pediatric patients is not well documented. Objective: To evaluate the safety of IVP levetiracetam in pediatric patients. Methods: Patients who received IV piggyback (IVPB) or IVP levetiracetam and were between the ages of 12 months and 18 years old were eligible for inclusion. Medication regimen data recorded includes the dose of levetiracetam, number of doses administered, and total days of administration. Additionally, time points related to order entry, pharmacist verification, and dose administration was recorded. Safety endpoints included rates of bradycardia, hypotension, behavioral changes, and cutaneous drug reactions. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: This study showed IVP levetiracetam has a similar rate of adverse effects when compared to IVPB levetiracetam in patients over the age of one (5.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.3589). In addition, there was improvement in the time to administration of levetiracetam (50 min in the IVPB group and 23 min in the IVP group [P = .0008]). Conclusion: Pediatric patients who received undiluted (100 mg/mL) levetiracetam IVP over 5 min had a similar adverse event incidence when compared to those who received the anti-epileptic drug (AED) as an IVPB. This evaluation demonstrated that doses up to 1500 mg of undiluted IVP levetiracetam is safe for pediatric patients.
背景:有证据支持左乙拉西坦作为快速静脉推注(IVP)用于突破性发作或癫痫持续状态患者的安全管理。使用这种给药途径可以通过缩短给药时间来降低发病率和死亡率。尽管这种做法在成人中越来越普遍,但IVP左乙拉西坦在儿科患者中的安全性尚未得到很好的证明。目的:评价小儿静脉注射左乙拉西坦的安全性。方法:年龄在12个月至18岁之间接受左乙拉西坦静脉注射(IVPB)或静脉注射(IVP)的患者符合入选条件。记录的用药方案数据包括左乙拉西坦的剂量、给药次数和总给药天数。此外,记录了与订单输入、药剂师验证和给药有关的时间点。安全性终点包括心动过缓、低血压、行为改变和皮肤药物反应的发生率。采用SPSS软件进行描述性和推断性统计分析。结果:本研究显示IVP左乙拉西坦与IVPB左乙拉西坦在1岁以上患者中的不良反应发生率相似(5.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.3589)。此外,左乙拉西坦给药时间也有所改善(IVPB组为50分钟,IVP组为23分钟[P = .0008])。结论:与接受抗癫痫药物(AED)作为IVPB的儿童相比,接受未稀释(100 mg/mL)左乙拉西坦IVP超过5分钟的儿童不良事件发生率相似。该评估表明,未稀释IVP左乙拉西坦的剂量高达1500mg对儿科患者是安全的。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.