Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer may Worsen Prognosis in Elderly Women: Retrospective Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the CLASSIC Study.
{"title":"Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer may Worsen Prognosis in Elderly Women: Retrospective Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the CLASSIC Study.","authors":"Fumitaka Noji, Hideki Yoshioka, Ryota Jin, Hiroto Hatakeyama, Hiromi Sato, Akihiro Hisaka","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01239-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aimed to identify significant prognostic factors that interact with the treatment effect of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX), based on individual patient data from the CLASSIC study (NCT00411229), which evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stepwise variable selection of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, with patient data from 519 CapeOX-treated and 514 untreated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all-cause mortality, older women (≥ 55 years) with a serum albumin level ≥ 4.0 g/dL were identified as significant prognostic factors interacting with CapeOX treatment, and unexpectedly, the treatment was associated with poor outcomes in this group. The prognostic significance of serum albumin levels was primarily attributed to the particularly poor survival outcomes observed in untreated patients with serum albumin < 4.0 g/dL. Tumor stage and lymph node status were prognostic factors that interacted with treatment for disease-free survival (DFS). The results showed that in patients with tumor stage (T) ≥ T3 and lymph node metastasis (N) < N2, improvement in DFS with CapeOX was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As this was a post-hoc analysis, the results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Nevertheless, the findings suggest the need for a more detailed consideration of patient baseline characteristics when determining the adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01239-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This research aimed to identify significant prognostic factors that interact with the treatment effect of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX), based on individual patient data from the CLASSIC study (NCT00411229), which evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
Methods: Stepwise variable selection of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, with patient data from 519 CapeOX-treated and 514 untreated patients.
Results: For all-cause mortality, older women (≥ 55 years) with a serum albumin level ≥ 4.0 g/dL were identified as significant prognostic factors interacting with CapeOX treatment, and unexpectedly, the treatment was associated with poor outcomes in this group. The prognostic significance of serum albumin levels was primarily attributed to the particularly poor survival outcomes observed in untreated patients with serum albumin < 4.0 g/dL. Tumor stage and lymph node status were prognostic factors that interacted with treatment for disease-free survival (DFS). The results showed that in patients with tumor stage (T) ≥ T3 and lymph node metastasis (N) < N2, improvement in DFS with CapeOX was not significant.
Conclusion: As this was a post-hoc analysis, the results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Nevertheless, the findings suggest the need for a more detailed consideration of patient baseline characteristics when determining the adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.