Outcomes of Asynchronous e-Visits vs. Telephone or Video Visits for Common Primary Care Concerns.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Evangeline Sievers, Reena Bhargava
{"title":"Outcomes of Asynchronous e-Visits vs. Telephone or Video Visits for Common Primary Care Concerns.","authors":"Mary Reed, Jie Huang, Evangeline Sievers, Reena Bhargava","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09533-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asynchronous structured electronic visits (e-Visits) can offer efficient day-or-night care-seeking for some uncomplicated conditions when linked to their electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare asynchronous e-Visit outcomes with scheduled telemedicine visits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cohort study in an integrated delivery system during a COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All 24,584 patients newly seeking primary care for urinary tract infection (UTI) or pink eye via e-Visit or telephone/video visit April 2020-March 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Asynchronous e-Visits.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Antibiotic prescribing and follow-up care-seeking within 72 h or 7 days (office or ED visits, hospitalization) were examined using multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Among 14,909 e-Visits, 6290 telephone visits, and 3385 video visits: 69.1% of UTI visits were e-Visits and 31.5% for pink eye were e-Visits. After adjustment, for UTI, 90.7% (95% CI: 90.2%-91.2%) of e-Visit patients received an antibiotic prescription and 13.9% (95% CI: 8.5%-9.5%) had a clinically related 7-day outpatient visit (vs. 60.7% [95% CI: 59.2%-62.1%] antibiotic prescribing for telephone and 57.3% [95% CI: 54.4%-60.2%] for video; 8.8% [95% CI: 8.0%-9.6%] return visits after telephone visit, and 9.0% [95% CI: 7.4%-10.6%] after video). For pink eye, 36.8% (95% CI: 33.7%-38.3%) of e-Visits received an antibiotic prescription and 13.9% (95% CI: 12.3%-15.6%) had an outpatient visit (vs. 42.6% [95% CI: 40.2%-45.1%] antibiotic prescribing for telephone and 39.9% [95% CI: 37.8%-41.9%] for video; 11.0% [95% CI: 9.4%-12.6%] return visits after telephone visit and 10.6% [95% CI: 9.4%-11.9%] after video). Clinically related emergency room visits were rare and not significantly different between visit types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotic prescribing varied, but return follow-up visits were comparable between telemedicine channels for UTI. Return rates for pink eye were 3% marginally higher after e-Visit than for scheduled telemedicine, without ED visit or hospitalization differences. Asynchronous care options for common primary care concerns may expand care access with comparable outcomes. Additional outreach may be needed to ensure access and awareness of e-Visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09533-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asynchronous structured electronic visits (e-Visits) can offer efficient day-or-night care-seeking for some uncomplicated conditions when linked to their electronic health record.

Objective: Compare asynchronous e-Visit outcomes with scheduled telemedicine visits.

Design: Observational cohort study in an integrated delivery system during a COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on in-person visits.

Participants: All 24,584 patients newly seeking primary care for urinary tract infection (UTI) or pink eye via e-Visit or telephone/video visit April 2020-March 2021.

Interventions: Asynchronous e-Visits.

Main measures: Antibiotic prescribing and follow-up care-seeking within 72 h or 7 days (office or ED visits, hospitalization) were examined using multivariable analyses.

Key results: Among 14,909 e-Visits, 6290 telephone visits, and 3385 video visits: 69.1% of UTI visits were e-Visits and 31.5% for pink eye were e-Visits. After adjustment, for UTI, 90.7% (95% CI: 90.2%-91.2%) of e-Visit patients received an antibiotic prescription and 13.9% (95% CI: 8.5%-9.5%) had a clinically related 7-day outpatient visit (vs. 60.7% [95% CI: 59.2%-62.1%] antibiotic prescribing for telephone and 57.3% [95% CI: 54.4%-60.2%] for video; 8.8% [95% CI: 8.0%-9.6%] return visits after telephone visit, and 9.0% [95% CI: 7.4%-10.6%] after video). For pink eye, 36.8% (95% CI: 33.7%-38.3%) of e-Visits received an antibiotic prescription and 13.9% (95% CI: 12.3%-15.6%) had an outpatient visit (vs. 42.6% [95% CI: 40.2%-45.1%] antibiotic prescribing for telephone and 39.9% [95% CI: 37.8%-41.9%] for video; 11.0% [95% CI: 9.4%-12.6%] return visits after telephone visit and 10.6% [95% CI: 9.4%-11.9%] after video). Clinically related emergency room visits were rare and not significantly different between visit types.

Conclusions: Antibiotic prescribing varied, but return follow-up visits were comparable between telemedicine channels for UTI. Return rates for pink eye were 3% marginally higher after e-Visit than for scheduled telemedicine, without ED visit or hospitalization differences. Asynchronous care options for common primary care concerns may expand care access with comparable outcomes. Additional outreach may be needed to ensure access and awareness of e-Visits.

非同步电子就诊与电话或视频就诊对常见初级保健问题的影响。
背景:异步结构化电子就诊(e- visit)与电子健康记录相关联,可以为一些简单的病症提供高效的日间或夜间求诊。目的:比较异步电子就诊与预约远程医疗就诊的结果。设计:在COVID-19大流行期间限制亲自就诊的综合输送系统中的观察性队列研究。参与者:所有24,584例通过电子访问或电话/视频访问新寻求尿路感染(UTI)或红眼病初级保健的患者。干预措施:异步电子访问。主要措施:采用多变量分析对72 h或7天内的抗生素处方和随访求诊(办公室或急诊室就诊、住院)进行检查。关键结果:在14909次e- visit中,6290次电话访问,3385次视频访问,69.1%的UTI访问为e- visit, 31.5%的红眼访问为e- visit。调整后,对于UTI, 90.7% (95% CI: 90.2%-91.2%)的e-Visit患者获得了抗生素处方,13.9% (95% CI: 8.5%-9.5%)的患者有临床相关的7天门诊就诊(电话抗生素处方60.7% [95% CI: 59.2%-62.1%],视频抗生素处方57.3% [95% CI: 54.4%-60.2%];8.8% [95% CI: 8.0%-9.6%]电话后回访,9.0% [95% CI: 7.4%-10.6%]视频后回访)。对于红眼病,36.8% (95% CI: 33.7%-38.3%)的电子就诊患者收到了抗生素处方,13.9% (95% CI: 12.3%-15.6%)的患者接受了门诊就诊(42.6% [95% CI: 40.2%-45.1%]的电话抗生素处方和39.9% [95% CI: 37.8%-41.9%]的视频抗生素处方;11.0% [95% CI: 9.4%-12.6%]电话后回访,10.6% [95% CI: 9.4%-11.9%]视频后回访)。与临床相关的急诊室就诊很少,且就诊类型之间无显著差异。结论:抗生素处方各不相同,但不同远程医疗渠道对尿路感染的回访具有可比性。电子就诊后的红眼病复发率比预定的远程医疗高3%,没有急诊科就诊或住院的差异。针对常见初级保健问题的异步护理方案可能会扩大具有可比结果的护理可及性。可能需要额外的宣传,以确保访问和认识电子访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信