Ahmad Mourad, Joshua B Parsons, Lesley A Skalla, Thomas L Holland, Timothy C Jenkins
{"title":"Combination therapy with fosfomycin for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Ahmad Mourad, Joshua B Parsons, Lesley A Skalla, Thomas L Holland, Timothy C Jenkins","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis has been evaluated, but studies were limited by small sample sizes. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish robust efficacy and safety estimates of fosfomycin combination therapy in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024583822).</p><p><strong>Study eligibility: </strong>RCTs comparing fosfomycin combination with standard-of-care antibiotics in patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis and analysis: </strong>Treatment effects were estimated with pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 437 articles identified, three RCTs met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of treatment success or cure was not meta-analysed due to clinical heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not significantly improve mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.28-2.52; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 27.8%) or persistent bacteraemia (RR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 0%). Participants receiving combination therapy had more adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but this was not statistically significant (RR 1.84; 95% CI, 0.36-9.36; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis did not significantly improve patient outcomes and may be associated with higher rates of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 3","pages":"dlaf101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Fosfomycin combination therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis has been evaluated, but studies were limited by small sample sizes. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish robust efficacy and safety estimates of fosfomycin combination therapy in this patient population.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024583822).
Study eligibility: RCTs comparing fosfomycin combination with standard-of-care antibiotics in patients with S. aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion.
Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool.
Data synthesis and analysis: Treatment effects were estimated with pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic and I2 test.
Results: Of 437 articles identified, three RCTs met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of treatment success or cure was not meta-analysed due to clinical heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not significantly improve mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.28-2.52; I2 = 27.8%) or persistent bacteraemia (RR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59; I2 = 0%). Participants receiving combination therapy had more adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but this was not statistically significant (RR 1.84; 95% CI, 0.36-9.36; I2 = 18%).
Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, fosfomycin combination therapy for S. aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis did not significantly improve patient outcomes and may be associated with higher rates of adverse events.