Dental magnetic resonance imaging for bone loss assessment and disease activity classification in severe periodontitis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Arne Lauer, Luisa Schulte, Artid Skenderi, Nouha Tekiki, Alexander Juerchott, Meysam Sohani, Maurice Ruetters, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Peter Rammelsberg, Mathias Nittka, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld
{"title":"Dental magnetic resonance imaging for bone loss assessment and disease activity classification in severe periodontitis.","authors":"Arne Lauer, Luisa Schulte, Artid Skenderi, Nouha Tekiki, Alexander Juerchott, Meysam Sohani, Maurice Ruetters, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Peter Rammelsberg, Mathias Nittka, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Tim Hilgenfeld","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02004-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of dental MRI (dMRI) for volumetric infrabony and furcation bone loss compared to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to correlate to clinical signs of inflammation in patients with severe periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study nineteen patients with severe periodontitis underwent standardized clinical examination as well as pre-treatment CBCT and 3T-dMRI. Bone lesion volumetry was performed in CBCT, contrast-enhanced-T1-weighting (T1W + C) and T2-weighting (T2W) dMRI. Lesions whose T2W signal significantly exceeded T1W/CBCT margins (indicating excessive edema) were classified as T2W-mismatch. Volumetric data were compared to clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten female and nine male patients with 253 bony lesions were examined. Reliability for bone lesions was highest in CBCT (ICC [95% CI] T1W + C/T2W/CBCT: 0.78 [0.74-0.83]/0.82 [0.77-0.85]/0.87 [0.94-0.89]). Overall, T1W + C and T2W dMRI strongly correlated with CBCT (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.89], p < 0.001 and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88-0.93], p < 0.001 respectively) but volume was significantly overestimated by dMRI (median percentage error of T1W + C-T2W: 19-55%). A T2W-mismatch was found in 44.1% and correlated with bleeding (85.8% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.005), giving 47.5% sensitivity and 71.2% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While dMRI offers good reliability, T2W- and to a lesser extent T1W + C imaging overestimate infrabony and interradicular periodontal bone lesion volumetry compared to CBCT. While this could increase the risk of overtreatment, dMRI detects periodontal inflammation beyond areas of bone loss, and T2W-mismatch is closely related but not identical to signs of active inflammation in clinical examination. This may provide additional diagnostic information and could serve as a supplemental tool for higher-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Dental MRI excels in detecting inflammation beyond bone loss, identifying high-risk tissue. This study assesses reliability in evaluating periodontitis-related bone loss, highlighting its tendency to overestimate lesion volume. A novel \"mismatch lesion pattern\" was observed, potentially linked to disease activity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Dental MRI (dMRI) reliably assesses bone loss in periodontitis but overestimates volume vs. cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). dMRI detects excess bone marrow edema, indicating inflammation beyond visible bone loss. dMRI could aid periodontal diagnosis and guide targeted therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02004-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of dental MRI (dMRI) for volumetric infrabony and furcation bone loss compared to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to correlate to clinical signs of inflammation in patients with severe periodontitis.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study nineteen patients with severe periodontitis underwent standardized clinical examination as well as pre-treatment CBCT and 3T-dMRI. Bone lesion volumetry was performed in CBCT, contrast-enhanced-T1-weighting (T1W + C) and T2-weighting (T2W) dMRI. Lesions whose T2W signal significantly exceeded T1W/CBCT margins (indicating excessive edema) were classified as T2W-mismatch. Volumetric data were compared to clinical findings.

Results: Ten female and nine male patients with 253 bony lesions were examined. Reliability for bone lesions was highest in CBCT (ICC [95% CI] T1W + C/T2W/CBCT: 0.78 [0.74-0.83]/0.82 [0.77-0.85]/0.87 [0.94-0.89]). Overall, T1W + C and T2W dMRI strongly correlated with CBCT (rs = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.89], p < 0.001 and rs = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88-0.93], p < 0.001 respectively) but volume was significantly overestimated by dMRI (median percentage error of T1W + C-T2W: 19-55%). A T2W-mismatch was found in 44.1% and correlated with bleeding (85.8% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.005), giving 47.5% sensitivity and 71.2% specificity.

Conclusions: While dMRI offers good reliability, T2W- and to a lesser extent T1W + C imaging overestimate infrabony and interradicular periodontal bone lesion volumetry compared to CBCT. While this could increase the risk of overtreatment, dMRI detects periodontal inflammation beyond areas of bone loss, and T2W-mismatch is closely related but not identical to signs of active inflammation in clinical examination. This may provide additional diagnostic information and could serve as a supplemental tool for higher-risk patients.

Critical relevance statement: Dental MRI excels in detecting inflammation beyond bone loss, identifying high-risk tissue. This study assesses reliability in evaluating periodontitis-related bone loss, highlighting its tendency to overestimate lesion volume. A novel "mismatch lesion pattern" was observed, potentially linked to disease activity.

Key points: Dental MRI (dMRI) reliably assesses bone loss in periodontitis but overestimates volume vs. cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). dMRI detects excess bone marrow edema, indicating inflammation beyond visible bone loss. dMRI could aid periodontal diagnosis and guide targeted therapeutic interventions.

重度牙周炎患者的骨丢失评估和疾病活动性分类的牙磁共振成像。
目的:评估与锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)相比,牙科MRI (dMRI)对体积下骨和分叉性骨丢失的可靠性和准确性,并与严重牙周炎患者炎症的临床体征相关联。方法:在本横断面研究中,19例重度牙周炎患者进行了标准化的临床检查以及治疗前的CBCT和3T-dMRI。在CBCT、对比增强t1加权(T1W + C)和t2加权(T2W) dMRI中进行骨病变体积测量。T2W信号明显超过T1W/CBCT边缘(提示过度水肿)的病变归类为T2W错配。将体积数据与临床结果进行比较。结果:共检查骨病变253例,女10例,男9例。CBCT诊断骨病变的可靠性最高(ICC [95% CI] T1W + C/T2W/CBCT: 0.78[0.74-0.83]/0.82[0.77-0.85]/0.87[0.94-0.89])。总体而言,T1W + C和T2W dMRI与CBCT有很强的相关性(rs = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.89], p = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.88-0.93], p结论:虽然dMRI提供了良好的可靠性,但与CBCT相比,T2W-和T1W + C成像在较小程度上高估了骨下和根间牙周骨病变体积。虽然这可能会增加过度治疗的风险,但dMRI检测的牙周炎症超出了骨质流失的范围,t2w不匹配与临床检查中的活动性炎症症状密切相关,但并不完全相同。这可能提供额外的诊断信息,并可作为高风险患者的补充工具。关键相关声明:牙科MRI在检测骨质流失以外的炎症、识别高风险组织方面表现出色。本研究评估了评估牙周炎相关骨质流失的可靠性,强调了其高估病变体积的倾向。观察到一种新的“不匹配病变模式”,可能与疾病活动有关。重点:牙科MRI (dMRI)可靠地评估牙周炎的骨质流失,但与锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)相比,它高估了体积。dMRI检测骨髓水肿,表明炎症超出可见的骨质流失。dMRI可以帮助牙周诊断和指导有针对性的治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信