Angela V Flynn, Margaret Bermingham, Maria Caples, Margaret Curtin, Caroline Dalton, Geraldine McLoughlin, James O'Mahony, Mohamad M Saab, Sonja Vucen
{"title":"Health Professionals' Knowledge and Understanding of Inclusion Health: A systematic literature review.","authors":"Angela V Flynn, Margaret Bermingham, Maria Caples, Margaret Curtin, Caroline Dalton, Geraldine McLoughlin, James O'Mahony, Mohamad M Saab, Sonja Vucen","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing need for healthcare professionals to ensure that their practices are inclusive and that they are considerate of the needs of marginalised communities. Inclusion health seeks to correct the imbalances that result in health inequities and requires health practitioners to have an adequate understanding and knowledge of the needs of marginalised and vulnerable population groups. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise and critically appraise evidence from studies that explored healthcare professionals' knowledge and/or awareness of inclusion health. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, SocINDEX, were systematically searched without any year or language limits. The last search was conducted 16th of December 2024. A total of 4,870 studies were identified; of which, 37 were included (21 qualitative studies, 7 quantitative studies, 6 mixed-methods studies, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 1 quasi-experimental study). The methodological quality of the studies was appraised. Most studies were from the United States and Australia and focused on inclusion health knowledge regarding members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer community, people with disabilities, and culturally diverse populations. Studies examining healthcare professionals' knowledge and awareness were not homogenous in nature resulting in a wide variety of studies and types of data. Different minority groups require varied levels of insights and understanding from their healthcare professionals. There is therefore no one-size-fits-all solution. We recommend targeted interventions throughout the training and education of healthcare professionals, informed and designed by the participation of members of those marginalised communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a growing need for healthcare professionals to ensure that their practices are inclusive and that they are considerate of the needs of marginalised communities. Inclusion health seeks to correct the imbalances that result in health inequities and requires health practitioners to have an adequate understanding and knowledge of the needs of marginalised and vulnerable population groups. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise and critically appraise evidence from studies that explored healthcare professionals' knowledge and/or awareness of inclusion health. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, SocINDEX, were systematically searched without any year or language limits. The last search was conducted 16th of December 2024. A total of 4,870 studies were identified; of which, 37 were included (21 qualitative studies, 7 quantitative studies, 6 mixed-methods studies, 2 cross-sectional studies, and 1 quasi-experimental study). The methodological quality of the studies was appraised. Most studies were from the United States and Australia and focused on inclusion health knowledge regarding members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer community, people with disabilities, and culturally diverse populations. Studies examining healthcare professionals' knowledge and awareness were not homogenous in nature resulting in a wide variety of studies and types of data. Different minority groups require varied levels of insights and understanding from their healthcare professionals. There is therefore no one-size-fits-all solution. We recommend targeted interventions throughout the training and education of healthcare professionals, informed and designed by the participation of members of those marginalised communities.
越来越需要保健专业人员确保他们的做法具有包容性,并考虑到边缘化社区的需求。包容卫生旨在纠正导致卫生不公平的不平衡现象,并要求卫生从业人员充分了解和了解边缘化和弱势人口群体的需求。本系统综述的目的是综合并批判性地评价来自探索医疗保健专业人员对包容性健康的知识和/或意识的研究的证据。学术检索完成,CINAHL Plus全文,MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, SocINDEX,系统检索,没有任何年份和语言限制。最后一次搜索是在2024年12月16日。总共确定了4870项研究;其中纳入37项研究(21项定性研究,7项定量研究,6项混合方法研究,2项横断面研究,1项准实验研究)。对研究的方法学质量进行了评价。大多数研究来自美国和澳大利亚,重点关注女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和酷儿群体成员、残疾人和文化多样化人群的包容性健康知识。检查医疗保健专业人员的知识和意识的研究在本质上不是同质的,导致各种各样的研究和数据类型。不同的少数群体需要他们的医疗保健专业人员提供不同程度的见解和理解。因此,没有放之四海而皆准的解决方案。我们建议在保健专业人员的整个培训和教育过程中采取有针对性的干预措施,并由边缘化社区成员的参与提供信息和设计。
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries.
Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.