From barriers to solutions: an expert-based algorithm for cholangiocarcinoma and other biliary tract cancers testing in the Era of precision oncology.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Albrecht Stenzinger, Nicola Normanno, Angela Lamarca, Lorenza Rimassa, Fréderic Bibeau, Philippe Taniere, Arndt Vogel, Antoine Hollebecque
{"title":"From barriers to solutions: an expert-based algorithm for cholangiocarcinoma and other biliary tract cancers testing in the Era of precision oncology.","authors":"Albrecht Stenzinger, Nicola Normanno, Angela Lamarca, Lorenza Rimassa, Fréderic Bibeau, Philippe Taniere, Arndt Vogel, Antoine Hollebecque","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2025.2521538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biliary tract cancer (BTC) comprises a group of aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has advanced BTC management by identifying targetable genomic alterations. However, routine multigene NGS testing faces clinical, logistical, and economic barriers to widespread implementation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel of eight experts from Germany, France, the UK, Spain, and Italy convened to explore national challenges in NGS adoption and propose a structured molecular profiling approach. Discussions addressed pre-analytical tissue handling, sequencing strategies, and access limitations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite molecular advances, NGS access varies significantly across Europe. Barriers include suboptimal tissue sampling, restricted reimbursement, infrastructure gaps, and limited bioinformatics support. The panel recommends combined DNA and RNA sequencing as the ideal approach. In settings without NGS, referral to equipped centers is advised, with single-gene assays reserved for essential targets. This algorithm is a temporary yet practical guide to inform treatment decisions under current healthcare constraints, aiming to support equitable and informed care for BTC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"495-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2521538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) comprises a group of aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has advanced BTC management by identifying targetable genomic alterations. However, routine multigene NGS testing faces clinical, logistical, and economic barriers to widespread implementation.

Areas covered: A multidisciplinary panel of eight experts from Germany, France, the UK, Spain, and Italy convened to explore national challenges in NGS adoption and propose a structured molecular profiling approach. Discussions addressed pre-analytical tissue handling, sequencing strategies, and access limitations.

Expert opinion: Despite molecular advances, NGS access varies significantly across Europe. Barriers include suboptimal tissue sampling, restricted reimbursement, infrastructure gaps, and limited bioinformatics support. The panel recommends combined DNA and RNA sequencing as the ideal approach. In settings without NGS, referral to equipped centers is advised, with single-gene assays reserved for essential targets. This algorithm is a temporary yet practical guide to inform treatment decisions under current healthcare constraints, aiming to support equitable and informed care for BTC patients.

从障碍到解决方案:精确肿瘤学时代胆管癌和其他胆道癌症检测的专家算法。
胆道癌(BTC)是一组预后差且治疗选择有限的侵袭性恶性肿瘤。下一代测序(NGS)通过识别可靶向的基因组改变来推进BTC的管理。然而,常规的多基因NGS检测在广泛实施方面面临临床、后勤和经济障碍。涵盖领域:由来自德国、法国、英国、西班牙和意大利的8名专家组成的多学科小组探讨了采用NGS的国家挑战,并提出了一种结构化分子分析方法。讨论了分析前组织处理、测序策略和访问限制。专家意见:尽管分子技术取得了进步,但欧洲各国对NGS的获取情况差异很大。障碍包括不理想的组织采样、有限的报销、基础设施差距和有限的生物信息学支持。该小组建议将DNA和RNA结合测序作为理想的方法。在没有NGS的环境中,建议转诊到有设备的中心,并为基本目标保留单基因分析。该算法是一种临时但实用的指南,可在当前医疗保健限制下为治疗决策提供信息,旨在支持BTC患者的公平和知情护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信