Blood- and urine-based biomarkers for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a contemporary review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Keavash D Assani, Janene M Pierce, Lan Anh Galloway, Jeffrey J Tosoian
{"title":"Blood- and urine-based biomarkers for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a contemporary review.","authors":"Keavash D Assani, Janene M Pierce, Lan Anh Galloway, Jeffrey J Tosoian","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening aids early detection, its low specificity leads to unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of low-grade cancers. Blood- and urine-based biomarkers are proposed by clinical guidelines to better identify patients with elevated PSA that can safely avoid more intensive testing (e.g. imaging, biopsy). The current article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a contemporary assessment of prostate cancer biomarker tests.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This review focused on prebiopsy blood- and urine-based biomarker tests that are commercially-available and included in clinical guidelines. A systematic search identified 955 studies, of which 14 were published in the past 18 months (July 2023-January 2025) and reported performance metrics for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as grade group ≥2). The literature revealed that blood- [Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore, and IsoPSA] and urine-based tests [SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI), and MyProstateScore (MPS, MPS2)] maintained high sensitivity for csPCa while significantly reducing unnecessary biopsies performed relative to PSA-based testing. Furthermore, available data suggest that biomarkers can inform the need for biopsy in patients with equivocal (PI-RADS 3) mpMRI.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Commercially-available, noninvasive biomarker tests consistently outperformed PSA and PSA-based risk calculators for detection of csPCa. Clinical use of these tests appears to substantially reduce the proportion of unnecessary biopsies performed, while maintaining detection of the vast majority of significant cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening aids early detection, its low specificity leads to unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of low-grade cancers. Blood- and urine-based biomarkers are proposed by clinical guidelines to better identify patients with elevated PSA that can safely avoid more intensive testing (e.g. imaging, biopsy). The current article aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a contemporary assessment of prostate cancer biomarker tests.

Recent findings: This review focused on prebiopsy blood- and urine-based biomarker tests that are commercially-available and included in clinical guidelines. A systematic search identified 955 studies, of which 14 were published in the past 18 months (July 2023-January 2025) and reported performance metrics for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, defined as grade group ≥2). The literature revealed that blood- [Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore, and IsoPSA] and urine-based tests [SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI), and MyProstateScore (MPS, MPS2)] maintained high sensitivity for csPCa while significantly reducing unnecessary biopsies performed relative to PSA-based testing. Furthermore, available data suggest that biomarkers can inform the need for biopsy in patients with equivocal (PI-RADS 3) mpMRI.

Summary: Commercially-available, noninvasive biomarker tests consistently outperformed PSA and PSA-based risk calculators for detection of csPCa. Clinical use of these tests appears to substantially reduce the proportion of unnecessary biopsies performed, while maintaining detection of the vast majority of significant cancers.

基于血液和尿液的生物标志物检测临床意义重大的前列腺癌:当代回顾。
综述目的:前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的恶性肿瘤。虽然前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查有助于早期发现,但其低特异性导致不必要的活组织检查和低级别癌症的过度诊断。临床指南建议使用基于血液和尿液的生物标志物来更好地识别PSA升高的患者,从而可以安全地避免更密集的检测(如成像、活检)。本文旨在为临床医生和研究人员提供前列腺癌生物标志物测试的当代评估。最新发现:本综述主要关注活检前基于血液和尿液的生物标志物测试,这些测试已上市并被纳入临床指南。一项系统检索确定了955项研究,其中14项研究发表于过去18个月(2023年7月至2025年1月),并报告了临床显著性PCa (csPCa,定义为分级≥2)的表现指标。文献显示,血液-[前列腺健康指数(PHI), 4Kscore和IsoPSA]和基于尿液的测试[SelectMDx, ExoDx IntelliScore (EPI)和myprostatcore (MPS, MPS2)]对csPCa保持了高灵敏度,同时相对于基于psa的测试显著减少了不必要的活检。此外,现有数据表明,生物标志物可以告知模棱两可(PI-RADS 3) mpMRI患者是否需要活检。摘要:在检测csPCa方面,市面上可用的无创生物标志物检测始终优于PSA和基于PSA的风险计算器。这些检查的临床应用似乎大大减少了进行不必要的活组织检查的比例,同时保持了对绝大多数重大癌症的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信