Mohammad Moharrami, Elaheh Vahab, Mobina Bagherianlemraski, Ghazal Hemmati, Sonica Singhal, Carlos Quinonez, Falk Schwendicke, Michael Glogauer
{"title":"Deep Learning for Detecting Dental Plaque and Gingivitis From Oral Photographs: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mohammad Moharrami, Elaheh Vahab, Mobina Bagherianlemraski, Ghazal Hemmati, Sonica Singhal, Carlos Quinonez, Falk Schwendicke, Michael Glogauer","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) models in detecting dental plaque and gingivitis from red, green, and blue (RGB) intraoral photographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to January 31, 2025. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of studies developing and validating DL models for classification, detection, or segmentation tasks were analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3307 identified records, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 focused on dental plaque, 11 on gingivitis, and two addressed both outcomes. The risk of bias was low in all QUADAS-2 domains for 11 studies, with low applicability concerns in nine. For dental plaque, DL models showed robust performance in the segmentation task, with intersection over union (IoU) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.86 (median 0.74). Three studies indicated that DL models outperformed dentists in identifying dental plaque when disclosing agents were not used. For gingivitis, the models demonstrated potential but underperformed compared to dental plaque, with IoU values ranging from 0.43 to 0.72 (median 0.63). The certainty of the evidence was moderate for dental plaque and low for gingivitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DL models demonstrate promising potential for detecting dental plaque and gingivitis from intraoral photographs, with superior performance in plaque detection. Leveraging accessible imaging devices such as smartphones, these models can enhance teledentistry and may facilitate early screening for periodontal disease. However, the lack of external testing, multicenter studies, and reporting consistency highlights the need for further research to ensure real-world applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) models in detecting dental plaque and gingivitis from red, green, and blue (RGB) intraoral photographs.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to January 31, 2025. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of studies developing and validating DL models for classification, detection, or segmentation tasks were analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) framework.
Results: From 3307 identified records, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 focused on dental plaque, 11 on gingivitis, and two addressed both outcomes. The risk of bias was low in all QUADAS-2 domains for 11 studies, with low applicability concerns in nine. For dental plaque, DL models showed robust performance in the segmentation task, with intersection over union (IoU) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.86 (median 0.74). Three studies indicated that DL models outperformed dentists in identifying dental plaque when disclosing agents were not used. For gingivitis, the models demonstrated potential but underperformed compared to dental plaque, with IoU values ranging from 0.43 to 0.72 (median 0.63). The certainty of the evidence was moderate for dental plaque and low for gingivitis.
Conclusions: DL models demonstrate promising potential for detecting dental plaque and gingivitis from intraoral photographs, with superior performance in plaque detection. Leveraging accessible imaging devices such as smartphones, these models can enhance teledentistry and may facilitate early screening for periodontal disease. However, the lack of external testing, multicenter studies, and reporting consistency highlights the need for further research to ensure real-world applicability.
目的:本系统综述旨在评估深度学习(DL)模型在从红、绿、蓝(RGB)口腔内照片中检测牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的性能。方法:检索截至2025年1月31日的Medline、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science数据库的文献。分析了开发和验证用于分类、检测或分割任务的深度学习模型的方法学特征和性能指标。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐评估、发展和评估(GRADE)框架分级评估证据的确定性。结果:在3307份纳入记录中,23项研究符合纳入标准。其中10项针对牙菌斑,11项针对牙龈炎,2项针对两种结果。11项研究的所有QUADAS-2领域的偏倚风险较低,9项研究的适用性较低。对于牙菌斑,DL模型在分割任务中表现出稳健的性能,IoU值在0.64到0.86之间(中位数0.74)。三项研究表明,当不使用披露剂时,DL模型在识别牙菌斑方面优于牙医。对于牙龈炎,模型显示出潜力,但与牙菌斑相比表现不佳,IoU值范围为0.43至0.72(中位数为0.63)。证据的确定性对牙菌斑是中等的,对牙龈炎是低的。结论:DL模型显示了从口腔内照片检测牙菌斑和牙龈炎的良好潜力,在菌斑检测方面具有优越的性能。利用智能手机等可获得的成像设备,这些模型可以增强远程牙科学,并可能促进牙周病的早期筛查。然而,由于缺乏外部测试、多中心研究和报告一致性,需要进一步的研究来确保现实世界的适用性。
期刊介绍:
The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome.
The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry.
The journal is published bimonthly.