The use of indocyanine green and technetium-99 for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Madison Kolbow, Qianyun Luo, Alicia Cerrato Grande, Schelomo Marmor, Jennifer Witt, Sydne Muratore, Todd M Tuttle, Jane Y C Hui
{"title":"The use of indocyanine green and technetium-99 for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.","authors":"Madison Kolbow, Qianyun Luo, Alicia Cerrato Grande, Schelomo Marmor, Jennifer Witt, Sydne Muratore, Todd M Tuttle, Jane Y C Hui","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07767-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine if indocyanine green (ICG) is a suitable replacement for blue dye for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of female breast cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent SLNB with technetium-99 (Tc<sup>99</sup>) and ICG was performed from November 2022 to April 2024. Operative reports were reviewed to determine sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates with ICG (fluorescent) and Tc<sup>99</sup> (radioactive). Pathology reports were reviewed to determine the pathology of excised SLNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and nineteen SLNBs were performed on 117 patients. At least one radioactive or fluorescent SLN was identified in 93.2% of all patients. The mean number of SLNs retrieved per SLNB was 1.6 (fluorescent, 1.5; radioactive, 1.5). Of all excised SLNs, 89.4% were fluorescent, 88.4% were radioactive, and 81.9% were both fluorescent and radioactive. SLN metastases were present in 26 patients (22.2%); of SLNs identified with metastases on pathologic examination, 87.2% were fluorescent, 74.4% were radioactive, and 71.8% were both radioactive and fluorescent. Two patients (1.7%) experienced skin flap necrosis and one patient (0.9%) experienced prolonged skin discoloration. No patients experienced allergic reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that SLN identification rates using ICG and Tc<sup>99</sup> are comparable to those using blue dye and Tc<sup>99</sup>. Thus, ICG is a suitable alternative for blue dye. Future work should assess if ICG is a suitable tracer for SLNB in low-resource settings where Tc<sup>99</sup> is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07767-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if indocyanine green (ICG) is a suitable replacement for blue dye for dual-tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

Methods: A single-center retrospective review of female breast cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent SLNB with technetium-99 (Tc99) and ICG was performed from November 2022 to April 2024. Operative reports were reviewed to determine sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates with ICG (fluorescent) and Tc99 (radioactive). Pathology reports were reviewed to determine the pathology of excised SLNs.

Results: One hundred and nineteen SLNBs were performed on 117 patients. At least one radioactive or fluorescent SLN was identified in 93.2% of all patients. The mean number of SLNs retrieved per SLNB was 1.6 (fluorescent, 1.5; radioactive, 1.5). Of all excised SLNs, 89.4% were fluorescent, 88.4% were radioactive, and 81.9% were both fluorescent and radioactive. SLN metastases were present in 26 patients (22.2%); of SLNs identified with metastases on pathologic examination, 87.2% were fluorescent, 74.4% were radioactive, and 71.8% were both radioactive and fluorescent. Two patients (1.7%) experienced skin flap necrosis and one patient (0.9%) experienced prolonged skin discoloration. No patients experienced allergic reactions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that SLN identification rates using ICG and Tc99 are comparable to those using blue dye and Tc99. Thus, ICG is a suitable alternative for blue dye. Future work should assess if ICG is a suitable tracer for SLNB in low-resource settings where Tc99 is not available.

吲哚菁绿和锝-99在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结双示踪活检中的应用。
目的:本研究的目的是确定吲哚菁绿(ICG)是否适合替代蓝色染料进行双示踪前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。方法:对2022年11月至2024年4月接受锝-99 (Tc99) + ICG SLNB治疗的年龄≥18岁的女性乳腺癌患者进行单中心回顾性分析。回顾手术报告,用ICG(荧光)和Tc99(放射性)确定前哨淋巴结(SLN)的识别率。病理报告的审查,以确定病理切除的sln。结果:117例患者行slnb手术119例。93.2%的患者至少发现一种放射性或荧光SLN。每个SLNB平均检索到1.6个sln(荧光,1.5个;放射性,1.5)。在所有切除的sln中,89.4%为荧光,88.4%为放射性,81.9%为荧光和放射性。26例(22.2%)存在SLN转移;病理检查发现转移的sln中,87.2%为荧光,74.4%为放射性,71.8%为放射性和荧光兼有。2例(1.7%)出现皮瓣坏死,1例(0.9%)出现皮肤长时间变色。没有患者出现过敏反应。结论:本研究表明,ICG和Tc99对SLN的鉴别率与蓝色染料和Tc99的鉴别率相当。因此,ICG是蓝色染料的合适替代品。未来的工作应该评估ICG是否适合在缺乏Tc99的低资源环境中作为SLNB的示踪剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信