Stimulation of the human ventral tegmental area increases strategic betting.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf210
Stephanie T Hirschbichler, Susie Lagrata, Nicholas Shedd, Harith Akram, Petra Schwingenschuh, Christoph Waiß, Stefan Oberndorfer, Manjit S Matharu, Sanjay G Manohar
{"title":"Stimulation of the human ventral tegmental area increases strategic betting.","authors":"Stephanie T Hirschbichler, Susie Lagrata, Nicholas Shedd, Harith Akram, Petra Schwingenschuh, Christoph Waiß, Stefan Oberndorfer, Manjit S Matharu, Sanjay G Manohar","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning is a fundamental aspect of human behaviour and is essential for adapting to new environments and situations. The ventral tegmental area is a critical brain area containing neurons that release dopamine to signal reward, drive learning, and bias decision-making. Human data on ventral tegmental area's effects on cognition are scarce, and no studies have causally manipulated the human ventral tegmental area. Here we studied a unique group of patients who had deep brain stimulation surgery in the ventral tegmental area, to improve pain due to trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias refractory to medical therapy. In this study, we asked how deep brain stimulation, which aimed to inhibit the ventral tegmental area, affected reward-related learning and decision-making. Patients performed a reversal learning task while their deep brain stimulation was switched on vs. off, in a powerful within-subject design. In the task, patients learned to choose between two options to win money, based on previous outcomes, but also made post-decision bets based on whether they thought they were likely to win. This allowed us to also investigate the effect of electrical stimulation within the ventral tegmental area on betting behaviour. We found that stimulation did not affect learning in this group of patients but led to a more strategic betting behaviour. First, stimulation reduced the bias where healthy people tend to bet similarly to the previous trial. Second, when on stimulation, bets were more strongly linked to the actual value of the choice. The data indicate that disrupting ventral tegmental area signals by electrical stimulation reduces the perseverative betting bias, permitting more strategic decision-making. We interpret this to mean that mesolimbic dopaminergic signals in humans may be important in producing persistence of reward-driven behaviours over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning is a fundamental aspect of human behaviour and is essential for adapting to new environments and situations. The ventral tegmental area is a critical brain area containing neurons that release dopamine to signal reward, drive learning, and bias decision-making. Human data on ventral tegmental area's effects on cognition are scarce, and no studies have causally manipulated the human ventral tegmental area. Here we studied a unique group of patients who had deep brain stimulation surgery in the ventral tegmental area, to improve pain due to trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias refractory to medical therapy. In this study, we asked how deep brain stimulation, which aimed to inhibit the ventral tegmental area, affected reward-related learning and decision-making. Patients performed a reversal learning task while their deep brain stimulation was switched on vs. off, in a powerful within-subject design. In the task, patients learned to choose between two options to win money, based on previous outcomes, but also made post-decision bets based on whether they thought they were likely to win. This allowed us to also investigate the effect of electrical stimulation within the ventral tegmental area on betting behaviour. We found that stimulation did not affect learning in this group of patients but led to a more strategic betting behaviour. First, stimulation reduced the bias where healthy people tend to bet similarly to the previous trial. Second, when on stimulation, bets were more strongly linked to the actual value of the choice. The data indicate that disrupting ventral tegmental area signals by electrical stimulation reduces the perseverative betting bias, permitting more strategic decision-making. We interpret this to mean that mesolimbic dopaminergic signals in humans may be important in producing persistence of reward-driven behaviours over time.

刺激人体腹侧被盖区会增加策略性赌博。
学习是人类行为的一个基本方面,对于适应新的环境和情况至关重要。腹侧被盖区是一个关键的大脑区域,包含释放多巴胺的神经元,以发出奖励信号,驱动学习和偏见决策。人类关于腹侧被盖区对认知影响的研究资料很少,也没有对人类腹侧被盖区进行因果性操纵的研究。在这里,我们研究了一组独特的患者,他们在腹侧被盖区进行深部脑刺激手术,以改善药物治疗难治性三叉神经自主神经性头痛引起的疼痛。在这项研究中,我们询问了旨在抑制腹侧被盖区的深部脑刺激如何影响与奖励相关的学习和决策。在一个强大的受试者内部设计中,患者在打开或关闭深部脑刺激时执行了一个反向学习任务。在这项任务中,患者学会了根据之前的结果在两种选择中做出选择来赢钱,但也会根据他们是否认为自己有可能赢钱而做出决定后的赌注。这使我们能够研究电刺激在腹侧被盖区对赌博行为的影响。我们发现刺激不会影响这组患者的学习,但会导致更有策略的赌博行为。首先,刺激减少了健康人倾向于下注的偏差,与之前的试验类似。其次,当受到刺激时,赌注与选择的实际价值联系更紧密。数据表明,通过电刺激干扰腹侧被盖区信号可以减少持久的下注偏见,从而允许更多的战略决策。我们的解释是,这意味着人类中脑边缘多巴胺能信号可能在产生长期的奖励驱动行为中很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信