Nicole Williams, Sebastiaan Remmers, Alex Jay, Kerry Santoro, Michael O'Callaghan
{"title":"External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.","authors":"Nicole Williams, Sebastiaan Remmers, Alex Jay, Kerry Santoro, Michael O'Callaghan","doi":"10.1111/ans.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.
Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.
Results: Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.
Conclusion: Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.