Meta-analysis of risk factors for suicide after psychiatric discharge and meta-regression of the duration of follow-up.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Allyson Tai, Hannah Pincham, Ashna Basu, Matthew Large
{"title":"Meta-analysis of risk factors for suicide after psychiatric discharge and meta-regression of the duration of follow-up.","authors":"Allyson Tai, Hannah Pincham, Ashna Basu, Matthew Large","doi":"10.1177/00048674251348372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rates of suicide following discharge from psychiatric hospitals are extraordinarily high in the first week post-discharge and then decline steeply over time. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the strength of risk factors for suicide after psychiatric discharge and to investigate the association between the strength of risk factors and duration of study follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis of observational studies was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Post-discharge suicide risk factors reported five or more times were synthesised using a random-effects model. Mixed-effects meta-regression was used to examine whether the strength of suicide risk factors could be explained by duration of study follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches located 83 primary studies. From this, 63 risk estimates were meta-analysed. The strongest risk factors were previous self-harm (odds ratio = 2.75, 95% confidence interval = [2.37, 3.19]), suicidal ideation (odds ratio = 2.15, 95% confidence interval = [1.73, 2.68]), depressive symptoms (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = [1.48, 2.30]), and high-risk categorisation (odds ratio = 7.65, 95% confidence interval = [5.48, 10.67]). Significantly protective factors included age ⩽30, age ⩾65, post-traumatic stress disorder, and dementia. The effect sizes for the strongest post-discharge suicide risk factors did not decline over longer periods of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect sizes of post-discharge suicide risk factors were generally modest, suggesting that clinical risk factors may have limited value in distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk groups. The highly elevated rates of suicide immediately after discharge and their subsequent decline remain unexplained.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674251348372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251348372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rates of suicide following discharge from psychiatric hospitals are extraordinarily high in the first week post-discharge and then decline steeply over time. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the strength of risk factors for suicide after psychiatric discharge and to investigate the association between the strength of risk factors and duration of study follow-up.

Methods: A PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis of observational studies was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Post-discharge suicide risk factors reported five or more times were synthesised using a random-effects model. Mixed-effects meta-regression was used to examine whether the strength of suicide risk factors could be explained by duration of study follow-up.

Results: Searches located 83 primary studies. From this, 63 risk estimates were meta-analysed. The strongest risk factors were previous self-harm (odds ratio = 2.75, 95% confidence interval = [2.37, 3.19]), suicidal ideation (odds ratio = 2.15, 95% confidence interval = [1.73, 2.68]), depressive symptoms (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = [1.48, 2.30]), and high-risk categorisation (odds ratio = 7.65, 95% confidence interval = [5.48, 10.67]). Significantly protective factors included age ⩽30, age ⩾65, post-traumatic stress disorder, and dementia. The effect sizes for the strongest post-discharge suicide risk factors did not decline over longer periods of follow-up.

Conclusion: The effect sizes of post-discharge suicide risk factors were generally modest, suggesting that clinical risk factors may have limited value in distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk groups. The highly elevated rates of suicide immediately after discharge and their subsequent decline remain unexplained.

精神科出院后自杀危险因素的meta分析及随访时间的meta回归。
背景:精神病院出院后的自杀率在出院后的第一周非常高,然后随着时间的推移急剧下降。本荟萃分析的目的是评估精神科出院后自杀风险因素的强度,并调查风险因素强度与研究随访时间之间的关系。方法:根据PRISMA指南对观察性研究进行普洛斯罗注册的荟萃分析。出院后自杀风险因素报告五次或五次以上,使用随机效应模型进行综合。采用混合效应元回归来检验自杀风险因素的强度是否可以用研究随访时间来解释。结果:检索到83项主要研究。据此,对63项风险评估进行了荟萃分析。最强的危险因素是既往自残(优势比= 2.75,95%可信区间=[2.37,3.19])、自杀意念(优势比= 2.15,95%可信区间=[1.73,2.68])、抑郁症状(优势比= 1.84,95%可信区间=[1.48,2.30])和高危分类(优势比= 7.65,95%可信区间=[5.48,10.67])。显著的保护因素包括年龄≥30岁、年龄大于或等于65岁、创伤后应激障碍和痴呆。最强的出院后自杀风险因素的效应值并没有随着随访时间的延长而下降。结论:出院后自杀危险因素的效应量一般不大,提示临床危险因素在区分高危和低危人群中的价值可能有限。出院后的高自杀率和随后的下降仍然无法解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信