Broadscale reconnaissance of coral reefs from citizen science and deep learning.

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christopher L Lawson, Kathryn M Chartrand, Chris M Roelfsema, Aruna Kolluru, Peter J Mumby
{"title":"Broadscale reconnaissance of coral reefs from citizen science and deep learning.","authors":"Christopher L Lawson, Kathryn M Chartrand, Chris M Roelfsema, Aruna Kolluru, Peter J Mumby","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14261-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coral reef managers require various forms of data. While monitoring is typically the preserve of scientists, there is an increasing need to collect larger scale, up-to-date data to prioritise limited conservation resources. Citizen science combined with novel technology may achieve data collection at the required scale, but the accuracy and feasibility of new tools must be assessed. Here, we show that a citizen science program that collects large field-of-view benthic images and analyses them using a combination of deep learning and online citizen scientists can produce accurate benthic cover estimates of key coral groups. The deep learning and citizen scientist analysis methods had different but complementary strengths depending on coral category. When the best performing analysis method was used for each category in all images, mean estimates from 8086 images of percent benthic cover of branching Acropora, plating Acropora, and massive-form coral were ~ 99% accurate compared to expert assessment, and > 95% accurate at all coral cover ranges tested. Site-level accuracy of 95% was attainable with 18-80 images. Power analyses showed that up to 114 images per site were needed to detect a 10% absolute difference in coral cover per category (power = 0.8). However, estimates of 'all other coral' as a single category achieved 95% accuracy at only 60% of sites and for images with 10-30% coral cover. Overall, emerging technology and citizen science present an attainable tool for collecting inexpensive, widespread data that can complement higher resolution survey programs or be an accessible tool for locations with limited scientific or conservation resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 7","pages":"814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14261-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coral reef managers require various forms of data. While monitoring is typically the preserve of scientists, there is an increasing need to collect larger scale, up-to-date data to prioritise limited conservation resources. Citizen science combined with novel technology may achieve data collection at the required scale, but the accuracy and feasibility of new tools must be assessed. Here, we show that a citizen science program that collects large field-of-view benthic images and analyses them using a combination of deep learning and online citizen scientists can produce accurate benthic cover estimates of key coral groups. The deep learning and citizen scientist analysis methods had different but complementary strengths depending on coral category. When the best performing analysis method was used for each category in all images, mean estimates from 8086 images of percent benthic cover of branching Acropora, plating Acropora, and massive-form coral were ~ 99% accurate compared to expert assessment, and > 95% accurate at all coral cover ranges tested. Site-level accuracy of 95% was attainable with 18-80 images. Power analyses showed that up to 114 images per site were needed to detect a 10% absolute difference in coral cover per category (power = 0.8). However, estimates of 'all other coral' as a single category achieved 95% accuracy at only 60% of sites and for images with 10-30% coral cover. Overall, emerging technology and citizen science present an attainable tool for collecting inexpensive, widespread data that can complement higher resolution survey programs or be an accessible tool for locations with limited scientific or conservation resources.

通过公民科学和深度学习对珊瑚礁进行大规模侦察。
珊瑚礁管理人员需要各种形式的数据。虽然监测通常是科学家的工作,但越来越需要收集更大规模的最新数据,以优先考虑有限的保护资源。公民科学与新技术相结合可能实现所需规模的数据收集,但必须评估新工具的准确性和可行性。在这里,我们展示了一个公民科学项目,该项目收集了大范围的底栖生物图像,并结合深度学习和在线公民科学家对它们进行了分析,可以对关键珊瑚群产生准确的底栖生物覆盖估计。深度学习和公民科学家分析方法根据珊瑚类别的不同具有不同但互补的优势。当对所有图像中的每个类别使用最佳分析方法时,与专家评估相比,8086幅图像中分支Acropora,镀状Acropora和块状珊瑚的底栖生物覆盖率的平均值估计为~ 99%,而在所有珊瑚覆盖范围内测试的准确率为bb0 95%。18-80张图像的站点级精度达到95%。功率分析显示,每个地点需要多达114张图像才能探测到每类珊瑚覆盖面积10%的绝对差异(功率= 0.8)。然而,“所有其他珊瑚”作为单一类别的估计仅在60%的地点和10-30%珊瑚覆盖的图像中达到95%的准确率。总的来说,新兴技术和公民科学为收集廉价、广泛的数据提供了一种可行的工具,可以补充更高分辨率的调查计划,或者成为科学或保护资源有限的地区的一种可访问的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信