The aphantasia paradox: a Sartrean update

IF 11.7 1区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Brain Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf233

Margherita Arcangeli, Paolo Bartolomeo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuroscientific research into mental imagery often relies on David Hume’s view of visual imagination as weak perception. Arcangeli & Bartolomeo argue that Jean-Paul Sartre’s alternative framework—supported by recent findings on aphantasia—offers a more conceptually and empirically robust approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

幻觉悖论：萨特式的升级版

对心理意象的神经科学研究常常依赖于大卫·休谟关于视觉想象是弱知觉的观点。Arcangeli,Bartolomeo认为让-保罗·萨特的另一种框架——得到了最近关于幻觉的研究结果的支持——提供了一种更概念化和经验化的可靠方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Brain 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

20.30

自引率

4.10%

发文量

458

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.