P-364 Ovarian follicular density in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: new insights into the negative impact on ovarian reserve

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M Maletta, C Forastiere, R Vicenti, M Doglioli, D Raimondo, R Seracchioli
{"title":"P-364 Ovarian follicular density in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: new insights into the negative impact on ovarian reserve","authors":"M Maletta, C Forastiere, R Vicenti, M Doglioli, D Raimondo, R Seracchioli","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question Assessing follicular density in ovarian biopsies from women with breast cancer carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). Summary answer Follicular density appeared to be lower in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations compared to those without the mutation; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. What is known already BRCA1 mutation carriers have been reported to experience a 25% reduction in AMH levels, whereas evidence regarding the association between BRCA2 mutations and AMH levels remains inconsistent. Only one study has examined follicular density in ovarian biopsy tissue from women with breast cancer carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. In this study, no significant differences were reported in follicular density between BRCA-positive women and BRCA-negative patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for fertility preservation. Study design, size, duration A single center, observational, cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary level referral center for fertility preservation treatment. All patients who underwent OTC for breast cancer and met inclusion criteria, from January 1st, 2002 (date of establishment of the biobank) to September 30th, 2024, were included in the study. Out of 216 patients, 21 women reported germline mutation: 9 (4.2%) were carriers of the BRCA1 mutation and 13 (6%) of the BRCA2 mutation. Participants/materials, setting, methods The study was carried out in a tertiary level referral center for fertility preservation treatment. The whole study was reported according to the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement and checklist. Medical reports were searched for extraction of the following patient data: age at OTC, BMI, breast cancer treatments before OTC, antral follicular count on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound, anti-müllerian hormone concentration (ng/ml) prior to surgery, follicular density of ovarian tissue sample. Main results and the role of chance No significant difference in follicular density was observed among women without BRCA mutations, those with BRCA1 mutations, and those with BRCA2 mutations. The median follicular density was 4.0/mm² (range 0-74.5) in BRCA-negative women, 3.5/mm² (range 0-20) in women with BRCA1 mutations, and 4.0/mm² (range 0-32) in women with BRCA2 mutations (p = 0.272 and p = 0.703, respectively). After adjusting for age, no statistically significant differences in follicular density were observed according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status: the median follicular density was 4.6/mm² in BRCA-negative women, 3.1/mm² in women with BRCA1 mutations, and 3.6/mm² in women with BRCA2 mutations (p = 0.428 and p = 0.385, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution The first limit was the relatively small sample size due to the low prevalence of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Another limitation of the study was the absence of preoperative AMH values in nearly half of the patients. Wider implications of the findings Our study might suggest that, although it did not reach statistical significance, there could be a negative clinical impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on fertility. This warrants further investigation to provide women carring germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 more appropriate therapeutic guidance in the field of fertility preservation. Trial registration number No","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"643 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question Assessing follicular density in ovarian biopsies from women with breast cancer carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). Summary answer Follicular density appeared to be lower in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations compared to those without the mutation; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. What is known already BRCA1 mutation carriers have been reported to experience a 25% reduction in AMH levels, whereas evidence regarding the association between BRCA2 mutations and AMH levels remains inconsistent. Only one study has examined follicular density in ovarian biopsy tissue from women with breast cancer carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. In this study, no significant differences were reported in follicular density between BRCA-positive women and BRCA-negative patients undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for fertility preservation. Study design, size, duration A single center, observational, cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary level referral center for fertility preservation treatment. All patients who underwent OTC for breast cancer and met inclusion criteria, from January 1st, 2002 (date of establishment of the biobank) to September 30th, 2024, were included in the study. Out of 216 patients, 21 women reported germline mutation: 9 (4.2%) were carriers of the BRCA1 mutation and 13 (6%) of the BRCA2 mutation. Participants/materials, setting, methods The study was carried out in a tertiary level referral center for fertility preservation treatment. The whole study was reported according to the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement and checklist. Medical reports were searched for extraction of the following patient data: age at OTC, BMI, breast cancer treatments before OTC, antral follicular count on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound, anti-müllerian hormone concentration (ng/ml) prior to surgery, follicular density of ovarian tissue sample. Main results and the role of chance No significant difference in follicular density was observed among women without BRCA mutations, those with BRCA1 mutations, and those with BRCA2 mutations. The median follicular density was 4.0/mm² (range 0-74.5) in BRCA-negative women, 3.5/mm² (range 0-20) in women with BRCA1 mutations, and 4.0/mm² (range 0-32) in women with BRCA2 mutations (p = 0.272 and p = 0.703, respectively). After adjusting for age, no statistically significant differences in follicular density were observed according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status: the median follicular density was 4.6/mm² in BRCA-negative women, 3.1/mm² in women with BRCA1 mutations, and 3.6/mm² in women with BRCA2 mutations (p = 0.428 and p = 0.385, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution The first limit was the relatively small sample size due to the low prevalence of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Another limitation of the study was the absence of preoperative AMH values in nearly half of the patients. Wider implications of the findings Our study might suggest that, although it did not reach statistical significance, there could be a negative clinical impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on fertility. This warrants further investigation to provide women carring germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 more appropriate therapeutic guidance in the field of fertility preservation. Trial registration number No
P-364 BRCA1和BRCA2突变女性的卵巢卵泡密度:对卵巢储备负面影响的新见解
评估携带BRCA1和BRCA2突变的乳腺癌患者接受卵巢组织冷冻保存(OTC)后卵巢活检中的卵泡密度。与没有BRCA1/BRCA2突变的女性相比,携带BRCA1/BRCA2突变的女性卵泡密度似乎更低;然而,这种差异没有达到统计学意义。据报道,已知的BRCA1突变携带者的AMH水平降低了25%,而关于BRCA2突变与AMH水平之间关系的证据仍然不一致。只有一项研究检测了携带BRCA1或BRCA2突变的乳腺癌患者卵巢活检组织中的卵泡密度。在本研究中,brca阳性女性和brca阴性患者进行卵巢组织冷冻保存(OTC)以保存生育能力的卵泡密度无显著差异。研究设计、规模、持续时间:一项在三级转诊中心进行的单中心、观察性、横断面研究。所有于2002年1月1日(生物库建立之日)至2024年9月30日期间接受过非处方药治疗且符合纳入标准的乳腺癌患者纳入研究。在216名患者中,21名女性报告了种系突变:9名(4.2%)携带BRCA1突变,13名(6%)携带BRCA2突变。研究对象/材料、环境、方法本研究在某三级保生育转诊中心进行。整个研究按照加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明和清单进行报告。检索医学报告,提取以下患者资料:OTC时年龄、BMI、OTC前乳腺癌治疗情况、术前经阴道超声检查窦腔卵泡计数、术前抗勒氏杆菌激素浓度(ng/ml)、卵巢组织样本卵泡密度。无BRCA突变、BRCA1突变和BRCA2突变女性的卵泡密度无显著差异。brca阴性女性的中位卵泡密度为4.0/mm²(范围0-74.5),BRCA1突变女性为3.5/mm²(范围0-20),BRCA2突变女性为4.0/mm²(范围0-32)(分别p = 0.272和p = 0.703)。调整年龄后,根据BRCA1和BRCA2突变状态,卵泡密度无统计学差异:brca阴性女性的中位卵泡密度为4.6/mm²,BRCA1突变女性的中位卵泡密度为3.1/mm²,BRCA2突变女性的中位卵泡密度为3.6/mm²(p = 0.428和p = 0.385)。第一个限制是由于携带BRCA1和BRCA2突变的女性患病率较低,因此样本量相对较小。该研究的另一个局限性是近一半患者缺乏术前AMH值。我们的研究可能表明,尽管没有达到统计学意义,但BRCA1和BRCA2突变可能对生育能力有负面的临床影响。这需要进一步的研究,为携带BRCA1或BRCA2种系突变的女性提供更合适的生育保护领域的治疗指导。试验注册号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信