P-115 A deep learning-based system for oocyte image assessment predicts the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and morphokinetic fate in human preimplantation embryos

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
N Fujiwara, K Ezoe, T Miki, L Vanzella, N Mercuri, J Fjeldstad, P Mojiri, D Nayot, K Kato
{"title":"P-115 A deep learning-based system for oocyte image assessment predicts the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and morphokinetic fate in human preimplantation embryos","authors":"N Fujiwara, K Ezoe, T Miki, L Vanzella, N Mercuri, J Fjeldstad, P Mojiri, D Nayot, K Kato","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question How is the deep learning-based oocyte assessment system, Magenta, related to the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and biological events during the preimplantation period? Summary answer The Magenta score is predictive of delayed fertilization events in the pronuclei (PNs) and cytoplasm, abnormal blastomere cleavage, compaction errors, and impaired blastulation and expansion. What is known already Morphological assessment of oocyte quality remains challenging because of the lack of objective criteria. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been implemented in assisted reproductive technologies, leading to the development of several AI-based evaluation systems for oocytes and embryos. Magenta is a deep learning-based tool that predicts the embryonic development of mature oocytes to the blastocyst stage. It provides individual oocyte scores where higher scores indicate greater likelihood of blastocyst development. However, the specific relationship between Magenta score and morphokinetic parameters is unclear. Additionally, Magenta was developed using data from controlled-ovarian stimulation cycles; therefore, its effectiveness for minimal-stimulation cycles remains uncertain. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study included 2,950 images of mature oocytes from 1,487 oocyte retrieval cycles (average cohort size=1.99±1.11; 1,231 patients; mean age 38.7±4.0 years). Patients underwent clomiphene citrate-based minimal ovarian stimulation followed by ICSI between October 2019 and December 2020. Images were obtained immediately post-ICSI. Surgical sperm retrieval and/or recurrent implantation failure cases were excluded. Oocytes unsuitable for observation (i.e. poor image quality) were excluded. Magenta analysed individual mature oocytes, providing scores from 0 to 10. Participants/materials, setting, methods The microinjected oocytes were cultured for 4–7 days in a time-lapse incubator (Embryoscope+/Flex). Fertilization and embryo development at each stage were assessed with EmbryoViewer software, and key phenomena, including meiotic resumption, PN/cytoplasmic dynamics, cleavage patterns, blastomere compaction, and embryo quality were manually annotated. The relationship between the Magenta score, embryonic and pregnancy outcomes, and morphokinetics was analysed using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for bias using covariates and confounders to verify the statistical significance. Main results and the role of chance The mean Magenta score was 5.3±2.9 (median: 5.4; quartiles: 2.6, 8.0). A lower Magenta score correlated with a higher degeneration rate (P = 0.0006) and a lower normal fertilization rate (P = 0.0004) per ICSI. Additionally, the Magenta score positively correlated with the incidence of the first cleavage, development to the 8-cell stage, compaction, blastulation, and blastocyst expansion (P < 0.0001–0.0333). Although no correlation was observed between the Magenta score and the incidence of fertilization events, a low score was associated with delays in each fertilization event, including second polar body extrusion, cytoplasmic waves and halos, PN appearance and breakdown (P < 0.0001–0.023). Furthermore, a low score was associated with delayed first cleavage and a higher incidence of abnormal cleavage, aberrant blastomere movement, and multinucleation (P < 0.0001–0.0016). A lower Magenta score was also associated with a higher incidence of early compaction (P = 0.0133) and blastomere exclusion (P = 0.0002). No correlation was observed between the Magenta score and the time of blastocyst expansion; however, a low score was associated with poor morphology of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm (P < 0.0001–0.0031). Magenta score was not associated with pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfers. Limitations, reasons for caution This study has some limitations owing to its retrospective design. Independent validation from other research groups is necessary, as data were obtained from a single centre. Wider implications of the findings We demonstrated a significant correlation between the Magenta score and embryonic outcomes, including morphokinetic and morphological changes during the preimplantation period. Our findings contribute to accumulating knowledge on oocyte assessment using deep learning models, which can enhance standardization and provide greater transparency to patients throughout the IVF process. Trial registration number No","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question How is the deep learning-based oocyte assessment system, Magenta, related to the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and biological events during the preimplantation period? Summary answer The Magenta score is predictive of delayed fertilization events in the pronuclei (PNs) and cytoplasm, abnormal blastomere cleavage, compaction errors, and impaired blastulation and expansion. What is known already Morphological assessment of oocyte quality remains challenging because of the lack of objective criteria. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been implemented in assisted reproductive technologies, leading to the development of several AI-based evaluation systems for oocytes and embryos. Magenta is a deep learning-based tool that predicts the embryonic development of mature oocytes to the blastocyst stage. It provides individual oocyte scores where higher scores indicate greater likelihood of blastocyst development. However, the specific relationship between Magenta score and morphokinetic parameters is unclear. Additionally, Magenta was developed using data from controlled-ovarian stimulation cycles; therefore, its effectiveness for minimal-stimulation cycles remains uncertain. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study included 2,950 images of mature oocytes from 1,487 oocyte retrieval cycles (average cohort size=1.99±1.11; 1,231 patients; mean age 38.7±4.0 years). Patients underwent clomiphene citrate-based minimal ovarian stimulation followed by ICSI between October 2019 and December 2020. Images were obtained immediately post-ICSI. Surgical sperm retrieval and/or recurrent implantation failure cases were excluded. Oocytes unsuitable for observation (i.e. poor image quality) were excluded. Magenta analysed individual mature oocytes, providing scores from 0 to 10. Participants/materials, setting, methods The microinjected oocytes were cultured for 4–7 days in a time-lapse incubator (Embryoscope+/Flex). Fertilization and embryo development at each stage were assessed with EmbryoViewer software, and key phenomena, including meiotic resumption, PN/cytoplasmic dynamics, cleavage patterns, blastomere compaction, and embryo quality were manually annotated. The relationship between the Magenta score, embryonic and pregnancy outcomes, and morphokinetics was analysed using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for bias using covariates and confounders to verify the statistical significance. Main results and the role of chance The mean Magenta score was 5.3±2.9 (median: 5.4; quartiles: 2.6, 8.0). A lower Magenta score correlated with a higher degeneration rate (P = 0.0006) and a lower normal fertilization rate (P = 0.0004) per ICSI. Additionally, the Magenta score positively correlated with the incidence of the first cleavage, development to the 8-cell stage, compaction, blastulation, and blastocyst expansion (P < 0.0001–0.0333). Although no correlation was observed between the Magenta score and the incidence of fertilization events, a low score was associated with delays in each fertilization event, including second polar body extrusion, cytoplasmic waves and halos, PN appearance and breakdown (P < 0.0001–0.023). Furthermore, a low score was associated with delayed first cleavage and a higher incidence of abnormal cleavage, aberrant blastomere movement, and multinucleation (P < 0.0001–0.0016). A lower Magenta score was also associated with a higher incidence of early compaction (P = 0.0133) and blastomere exclusion (P = 0.0002). No correlation was observed between the Magenta score and the time of blastocyst expansion; however, a low score was associated with poor morphology of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm (P < 0.0001–0.0031). Magenta score was not associated with pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfers. Limitations, reasons for caution This study has some limitations owing to its retrospective design. Independent validation from other research groups is necessary, as data were obtained from a single centre. Wider implications of the findings We demonstrated a significant correlation between the Magenta score and embryonic outcomes, including morphokinetic and morphological changes during the preimplantation period. Our findings contribute to accumulating knowledge on oocyte assessment using deep learning models, which can enhance standardization and provide greater transparency to patients throughout the IVF process. Trial registration number No
基于深度学习的卵母细胞图像评估系统预测人类着床前胚胎卵胞浆内单精子注射的结果和形态动力学命运
研究问题:基于深度学习的卵母细胞评估系统Magenta与植入前的卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)和生物事件的结果有什么关系?Magenta评分可预测原核(PNs)和细胞质中的延迟受精事件、卵裂球分裂异常、压实错误以及囊胚发育和扩张受损。由于缺乏客观的标准,卵细胞质量的形态学评估仍然具有挑战性。人工智能(AI)最近在辅助生殖技术中得到了应用,导致了几个基于人工智能的卵母细胞和胚胎评估系统的发展。Magenta是一个基于深度学习的工具,可以预测成熟卵母细胞到囊胚阶段的胚胎发育。它提供单个卵母细胞评分,分数越高表明囊胚发育的可能性越大。然而,品红评分与形态动力学参数之间的具体关系尚不清楚。此外,Magenta是利用受控卵巢刺激周期的数据开发的;因此,它对最小增产周期的有效性仍然不确定。本回顾性研究包括1487个卵母细胞回收周期的2950张成熟卵母细胞图像(平均队列大小=1.99±1.11;1231例;平均年龄38.7±4.0岁)。患者在2019年10月至2020年12月期间接受了基于柠檬酸克罗米芬的最小卵巢刺激,随后进行了ICSI。icsi后立即获得图像。排除手术取精和/或反复植入失败的病例。排除不适合观察的卵母细胞(即图像质量差)。Magenta分析了单个成熟卵母细胞,提供从0到10的评分。微注射卵母细胞在延时培养箱(Embryoscope+/Flex)中培养4-7天。利用EmbryoViewer软件对每个阶段的受精和胚胎发育进行评估,并对减数分裂恢复、PN/细胞质动力学、卵裂模式、卵裂球压实和胚胎质量等关键现象进行人工注释。使用广义估计方程分析Magenta评分、胚胎和妊娠结局以及形态动力学之间的关系,使用协变量和混杂因素调整偏差以验证统计显著性。Magenta评分平均为5.3±2.9分(中位数:5.4分;四分位数:2.6,8.0)。Magenta评分越低,每ICSI的退变率越高(P = 0.0006),正常受精率越低(P = 0.0004)。此外,Magenta评分与第一次卵裂、发育到8细胞期、压实、囊胚形成和囊胚膨胀的发生率呈正相关(P <;0.0001 - -0.0333)。尽管品红评分与受精事件发生率之间没有相关性,但评分低与每次受精事件的延迟相关,包括第二极体挤压、细胞质波和光晕、PN外观和分解(P <;0.0001 - -0.023)。此外,低分值与延迟的第一次卵裂和更高的卵裂异常发生率、卵裂球异常运动和多核(P <;0.0001 - -0.0016)。较低的Magenta评分也与较高的早期压实发生率(P = 0.0133)和卵裂球排除(P = 0.0002)相关。Magenta评分与囊胚膨胀时间无相关性;然而,较低的评分与内细胞团和滋养外胚层的形态学差有关(P <;0.0001 - -0.0031)。单囊胚移植后的Magenta评分与妊娠结局无关。本研究采用回顾性设计,存在一定的局限性。来自其他研究小组的独立验证是必要的,因为数据是从单一中心获得的。我们证明了Magenta评分与胚胎结局之间的显著相关性,包括着床前阶段的形态动力学和形态变化。我们的研究结果有助于利用深度学习模型积累关于卵母细胞评估的知识,这可以增强标准化,并在整个试管婴儿过程中为患者提供更大的透明度。试验注册号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信